News Updates

Under Karnataka VAT Act, Post-Sale Discount Deductible Even If It Isn’t Shown In Tax Invoice: SC [Read Judgment]

Ashok KM
20 Jan 2017 5:52 AM GMT
Under Karnataka VAT Act, Post-Sale Discount Deductible Even If It Isn’t Shown In Tax Invoice: SC [Read Judgment]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

 The Supreme Court, in M/s. Southern Motors vs. State of Karnataka, has held that deductions under the provisions of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act can be claimed towards post-sale discounts granted by the dealer/manufacturer by issuing credit notes, even if it is not reflected in the tax invoice.

 A bench comprising Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Amitava Roy observed that the sale/purchase price has to be adjudged on a combined consideration of the tax invoice or bill of sale along with the accounts reflecting the trade discount and the actual price paid.

The court said the requirement of reference of the discount in the tax invoice or bill of sale to qualify it for deduction has to be construed in relation to the transaction resulting in the final sale/purchase price and not limited to the original sale sans the trade discount.

However, the transactions allowing discount have to be proved on the basis of contemporaneous records and the final sale price after deducting the trade discount must mandatorily be reflected in the accounts as stipulated under Rule 3(2)(c) of the Rules, the bench clarified.

Southern Motors had approached the Supreme Court against the Karnataka High Court ruling that had upheld the orders of the assessing authority disallowing the deduction of post-sale discounts earlier awarded by the corresponding credit notes.

Allowing the appeals, the bench said: “To deny the benefit of deduction only on the ground of omission to reflect the trade discount though actually granted in future, in the tax invoice/bill of sale at the time of the original transaction would be to ignore the contemporaneous actuality and be unrealistic, unfair, unjust and deprivatory. This may herald as well the possible unauthorised taxation even in the face of cotaneous accounts kept in ordinary course of business.”

Read the Judgment here.

This article has been made possible because of financial support from Independent and Public-Spirited Media Foundation.

Next Story