Justice A.K.Ganguly who resigned from the post of WBHRC Chairman, denied all the allegations made against him. He alleged a conspiracy against him to to malign his reputation. Here is the video of his interview with CNN IBN
The intern never complained to the SC, then why was a panel formed? I appeared before the court in good faith. The SC panel acted without jurisdiction and basis against me. I am questioning the role of my fellow judges in the SC.
The Union Cabinet did not apply its mind. It took a hasty decision. Presidential reference is mainly made on two grounds. One is my Pakistan visit. It is my fundamental right. A retired judge needs no permission to visit a foreign country. Second is the arbitration issue. In arbitration there is no employer employee relationship and also it is not a paid employment.
My version has been totally ignored. The assembly, the CM of West Bengal, without naming me cast serious aspersions against me. They were very uncomfortable with me as the West Bengal Human Rights Commission chief.
Earlier in another interview with “The Telegraph” he answered the following questions
Q: Have you resigned as the chairperson of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission?
Ganguly: Yes, I have resigned and it has been accepted. I have resigned to uphold my dignity and that of the number of posts I have held. I have not surrendered to any pressure but will continue to work for restoration of human rights of the common man. I am a victim of conspiracy but please don’t compel me to say anything further on the issue.
Q: What was the main reason for your decision?
Ganguly: I was impelled by the state government’s hostile approach and decision to frame two additional charges against me for my removal through a presidential reference. (The two charges are Ganguly’s trip to Pakistan without prior permission of the state government and acceptance of an arbitration assignment on behalf of the All India Football Federation.)
Q: How do you respond to the charge related to the Pakistan trip?
Ganguly: The first ground was that of going to Pakistan for two days. But you must know that the restriction imposed on going abroad is only on sitting judges. No longer am I a sitting judge. I have a fundamental right to go abroad. This can be restricted only by law. So, only when the law restricts, the restriction will apply. There is no such embargo on me under the Human Rights Act.
A sitting judge enjoys diplomatic passport. I went to Pakistan on an ordinary passport. Second, tickets for the travel were provided to me by an NGO in India. It is not a foreign organisation.
I have stayed in the house of a lawyer friend in Pakistan for two days. There was no (Pakistan) government contribution. And the rules of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), 2010, do not apply to casual hospitality for two days. As a retired judge, Section 6 of the FCRA would not apply to me. So, that cannot be a ground for my removal.
A previous chairperson of the WBHRC (West Bengal Human Rights Commission) had stayed in America for over one-and-a-half months without the prior permission of the state government. No questions were asked at that time. But I do not want to name the person in public.
Q: What about the second charge?
Ganguly: The state Human Rights Act only prohibits paid employment. What is not permitted under Section 23 of the act is paid employment. When an arbitrator is appointed by a party, he does not become an employee, nor does the appointing party become an employer. An arbitrator is an independent authority, he cannot be controlled by the party at all. The party cannot give any command to the arbitrator. However, I have no rancour towards anybody, including my detractors. I wish them all the best in their life.
Earlier an All India Football Federation (AIFF) official told ET that "An amount between Rs 2.5 lakh and Rs 3 lakh was paid for the official assignment through another lawyer who had got Justice Ganguly for it,". "His hotel expenses and airfare were borne by the AIFF (and) he has long back submitted his report,"