News Updates

Senior Advocate HS Phoolka Chooses 1984 Riot Victims Over ‘Office Of Profit’

LiveLaw News Network
10 July 2017 3:34 PM GMT
Senior Advocate HS Phoolka Chooses 1984 Riot Victims Over ‘Office Of Profit’
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Eminent lawyer and AAP leader HS Phoolka has decided to give up his post as the Leader of Opposition in Punjab Assembly after the Delhi Bar Council barred him from practicing while holding the cabinet-rank post and enjoying office of profit.

Having fought court battles for over 30 years for the victims of 1984 anti-Sikh riots cases without charging any fees, Phoolka had tweeted that he would not give up the cases and would rather give up his cabinet-rank post.

On Monday, he tweeted, “Sajjan Kumar bail cancellation adjourned to 13 July. Appeal also on same day, Sought party’s permission to resign tomorrow. Tnx for permitting.”

Three days ago also, he had tweeted saying he was ready to give up cabinet minister status to fight riots cases and that he could not leave the riot victims’ cases.

He was disallowed from practicing by the Bar Council on the ground that the same is barred by the Advocates Act.

After being disallowed to practice, he had again sought to know if he can appear in these cases pro-bono, but the council said the Act does not allow such flexibility.

On Tuesday (July 4), Phoolka tweeted, “Sought permission to do 84 carnage case pro bono, Bar Council sud realize, it doesn’t amount to practice, rather sud encourage it. Seek Review”.

However on Thursday, he again took to Twitter to say, “Will not give up 84carnage cases, Asking Bar Council if by giving up minister status, I can appear in these cases”.

He tweeted last week if he can be allowed to represent the victims pro-bono.

However, the Delhi Bar Council dismissed any such leeway, while speaking to Live Law, and said the Advocates Act does not allow the same.

Advocate KK Manan, a member of the special committee and ex-chairman of Bar Council of Delhi, said, “Had he been an MLA, he could have practiced but he is the Leader of the Opposition there, which is the rank of a minister.”

“He should have surrendered himself. Arun Jaitley did so himself, Ravi Shankar Prasad did. Everybody does that,” Manan added.

Next Story