News Updates

Uttarakhand HC Tells State Govt To Pay 50% Enhanced Compensation To 2013 Kedarnath Tragedy Victims [Read Judgment]

Arunima Bhattacharya
25 Nov 2016 5:06 AM GMT
Uttarakhand HC Tells State Govt To Pay 50% Enhanced Compensation To 2013 Kedarnath Tragedy Victims [Read Judgment]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Uttarakhand High Court in Jai Prakash Bisht & others vs. The Union of India & others and Ajendra Ajay vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, has directed the state government of Uttarakhand to pay adequate compensation to the victims of 2013 Kedarnath Valley tragedy.

A bench of Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Alok Singh directed to pay additional 50 per cent compensation to the victims, as these persons constitute a special class and have a right of rehabilitation under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The court perused all the schemes placed on record and of the considered view that the amount of compensation paid for the rehabilitation of the victims and affected families was inadequate.

It took note of the fact that new houses cannot be constructed with Rs.5 lakh as was paid by the state government.

A sum of Rs.5 lakh, to be paid to the next kith and kin of persons who died in the Valley, payment of Rs.2 lakh to the persons who suffered 80% disability, and Rs.1.5 lakh to the persons who suffered 40-80% disability was also found to be on the meager side.

The court, taking into consideration the massive loss caused to life and property in the area concerned, held that the amount of compensation should be increased by 50 per cent to mitigate the hardships faced by the victims.

It observed that the rescue operations were delayed, which further compounded the miseries of the helpless people trapped in the area. The high court was of the opinion that the State should have managed the disaster effectively and properly by involving all the agencies like Army, Air Force, National Disaster Relief Force, Paramilitary Forces and local police at the earliest.

The bench asserted that the State Government had the constitutional obligation to protect the life and liberty of its citizens, but was negligent in not taking sufficient preventive measures to prevent the tragedy.

The bench held that “there was apathy, insensitivity and callousness in the attitude of the State, even after the tragedy”. 

It iterated that welfare state and socialism were basic features of the Constitution and a welfare state should always adopt humanitarian approach to help the persons in distress on each and every count i.e. death case, injury case, destruction of houses, loss to crops, cattle etc. Thus, the bench directed the state government to pay additional 50 per cent compensation to the victims of Kedarnath Valley Tragedy of 2013 under all the categories provided for, in the rehabilitation schemes as well as the Policy for Reconstruction of Housing and Public Buildings, framed for these people, within a period of three months.

Regarding the children who were rendered orphan, the court held that:

“The State Government is further directed to trace and find out the children who were rendered orphans due to Kedarnath tragedy and to take all necessary steps for their rehabilitation, including their boarding and lodging, free education up to post-graduation. The State Government is also directed to provide stipend of Rs.7,500 per month to the orphans, till they attain the age of majority, to be deposited in their bank accounts through District Welfare Officers of the concerned district. The Chief Secretary of the State shall be personally responsible to execute the order in letter and spirit.”

Read the Judgment here.

This article has been made possible because of financial support from Independent and Public-Spirited Media Foundation.
Next Story