Click Here To Read LiveLaw Hindi- The First Hindi Legal News Website

Petition In Bombay HC Against Jolly LLB 2, Says Indian Judiciary Projected In A Derogatory Manner

An advocate has filed a writ petition before the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court seeking certain alterations in the movie Jolly LLB 2. The petitioner Ajay Kumar Waghmare has alleged that from “whatever is shown in trailers of the film that have been released on television and social media” it(the movie) is nothing but an “attempt to project the Indian Judiciary and the Indian legal system in a derogatory manner.”

The petitioner advocate without being specific, has sought removal of some scenes in the movie which are an attempt to malign the reputation of the judges who “dispense justice as a sacred duty”. A contempt notice is also sought to be issued to the makers of the film on account of “derogative insult and attempt to tarnish the image and reputation of Indian Judiciary and the Legal profession.”

A similar petition was filed against the first part of the film, Jolly LLB in 2013 by lawyers from Meerut. The Supreme Court while dismissing the petition had said– “Don’t watch Jolly LLB if it offends you.”

On the fictitious nature of films, Justice RM Lodha who was then heading the bench had observed-  “These things happen in movies. They show Bombay High Court’s door and gate and then show something else happening inside. These are all fictitious things.”

The petition also seeks a stay on any further release of content related to the film on social media or elsewhere until the matter is disposed of. The computer-generated date for this particular matter to be listed is January 27.

This article has been made possible because of financial support from Independent and Public-Spirited Media Foundation.

Got Something To Say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

*

  • Mr Sushil Kumar Gupta says:

    I am along with my wife and son are accused in a false case of 498a filed by the estranged DIL at Patna(Bihar).
    Vide Case No. 30365/2014 dtd.24thDec’14,
    at CIVIL Court Patna Sadar Under Court No.3 SDJM 76 .
    A transfer petition Civil Case No.594/2015 is pending at hon’ble supreme court of India.A settlement agreement was reached among both my son and his estranged wife at supreme court of India mediation centre.My son has withdrawn his Section – 9 at Vith Magistrate Family Court Bangalore but DIL has not withdrawn her false 498a at Patna ( Bihar ) insted she brought a page order from the SDJM stating that it’s a 498a and an FIR case thus it can not be withdrawn and both son and DIL submitted their respective orders copy to supreme court of India.
    Now since she has not complied the directions of the mediation centre of hon’ble supreme court of India .We are of the opinion that since it’s a false 498a by her on us why we shall pay her the amount specified in the mediation settlement agreement copy.We have enough proof in support of our being falsely implicated by her under a planned conspiracy through this false 498a criminal
    complaint (p) application submitted at the district court Patna(Bihar).We are not willing to give her a single panney as she is a working professional and earning a handsome salary.
    Please revert back with your sincere advice on this matter to us so as to get speedy a relief and justice.
    My contact details are as follows : –
    Mob .No.’s : 9927143222 ,9760501525
    E-mail id’s : sushilgupta2011@yahoo.com
    sushil2016gupta@gmail.com
    & guptbindu@gmail.com
    In anticipation awaiting a suitable reply.
    Thanks & Best Regards.

    • D. S. Chauhan advocate at Supreme Court says:

      Whenever a settlement is reached and filed before court, the court while accepting the same records undertaking of parties that they would abide by the terms thereof. If one of the parties backs out, it amounts to breach of undertaking and as in this case contempt of Supreme Court. Therefore file contempt petition in Supreme Court.

Top