SC Unhappy Over Non-Filling Of ITAT Vacancies

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

6 Aug 2017 4:28 AM GMT

  • “The process of appointment has been obfuscated and mere lip service has been paid to the matter”, Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora who appears in the matter had told the courtThe Centre has told the Supreme Court that the process of filling vacancies in  Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) across India is  at an advanced stage and the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet was looking...

    “The process of appointment has been obfuscated and mere lip service has been paid to the matter”, Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora who appears in the matter had told the court

    The Centre has told the Supreme Court that the process of filling vacancies in  Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) across India is  at an advanced stage and the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet was looking into it.

    But a bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar said it has to be expedited and assured that it will do whatever it can to get things at a faster pace.

    “I will try to expedite the things at my level”, the CJI assured advocate Meenakshi Arora who appeared for thte PIL petitioner. She alleged that the vacancies were not being filled up and the work was being affected at the tribunals.

    On July 6 the Centre was given three weeks time  to initiate process of filling up vacancies of presidents, vice presidents and members in different benches of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) across the country.

    During the proceedings, Arora had alleged that the process of appointment has been obfuscated and mere lip service has been paid to the matter.

    “The Selection Committee had made recommendations in 2015, but the appointments were made in 2017. Three of the four persons who were appointed would be retiring soon and the appointments were a mere lip service”, she had said.

    The court had earlier pulled up the Centre over the delay in the appointments, saying that the ITAT was one of the key sources of revenue earning for the government, which was still moving at a snail's pace in filling up the vacancies.

    The court was hearing a PIL filed by one Akshay Pundir, contending that ad hocism has become order of the day as many of the posts of senior vice presidents and vice presidents have not been filled up.

     The petition, filed through advocate Sanjeeb Panigrahi, had said the timely appointment of Presidents, Vice- Presidents and members will go a long way in tackling the burgeoning tax litigations in the country.

     The plea said the government is not taking steps to appoint the presidents, nor is it clearing the names of vice presidents. Therefore a chaos will arise in business circles if no person would be appointed as President before the vacancy arises.

    Next Story