Manipur Violence: Supreme Court Hearing- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

31 July 2023 5:46 AM GMT

  • Manipur Violence: Supreme Court Hearing- LIVE UPDATES

    The Supreme Court to hear the batch of petitions concerning ethnic clashes in the State of Manipur. The matter was taken up by a bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj MisraThe batch of petitions include a petition filed by the Manipur Tribal Forum Delhi seeking the protection of the Kuki tribe by the Indian Army and a petition filed by Chairman of the...

    The Supreme Court to hear the batch of petitions concerning ethnic clashes in the State of Manipur. The matter was taken up by a bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra

    The batch of petitions include a petition filed by the Manipur Tribal Forum Delhi seeking the protection of the Kuki tribe by the Indian Army and a petition filed by Chairman of the Hill Areas Committee (HAC) of the Manipur Legislative Assembly, Dinganglung Gangmei, challenging the direction of the Manipur High Court to consider the inclusion of Meitei community in the Scheduled Tribe list. It may be noted that the issue related to ST status for Meitei triggered the riots in the state.

    On July 20, the Supreme Court had taken suo moto cognisance of the issue arising out of the horrific video of two women in Manipur, being paraded naked and subjected to sexual violence amidst the ethnic conflict in the State. The court had directed the Centre and the State Government to inform it of the steps taken to bring the perpetrators into law. The court has stated in no uncertain terms that it would give a little time for the government to take action but if something was not done soon, it would step in.

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE 

    Live Updates

    • 31 July 2023 9:24 AM GMT

      SG Mehta: There will be atleast one woman officer who will report back to you. I'm requesting this should be moved out of the state of Manipur

    • 31 July 2023 9:24 AM GMT


      CJI DY Chandrachud: Suppose there are 1000 such cases- then is the CBI in position to conduct investigation in all these incidents? Because they're all connected.




    • 31 July 2023 9:23 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: But we want to know how many zero FIRs, what was the action taken, are there any 156 proceedings, to what extent has been legal aid provided? The other thing- is this the only standalone incident of violence on women? Or how many such FIRs are there?

    • 31 July 2023 9:21 AM GMT

      CJI: Out of these, how many were recorded as zero FIRs?

      SG: don't have instructions but whenever the police gets information, and territorial jurisdiction is not clarified, it is registered at zero FIRs.

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Right.

    • 31 July 2023 9:20 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: You say there are 6000 FIRs- How many of them involve crime against women? How many involve offences like murder, arson etc? What is the bifurcation between these 6000 FIRs?

    • 31 July 2023 9:19 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Why was it given to magistrate after 1 month and 3 days. There were 20 such FIRs, what did the police do?

    • 31 July 2023 9:18 AM GMT

      SG Mehta: My instructions are subject to the verification.

      CJI DY Chandrachud: Who was named in the FIR? Nobody was named. In which case what was the police doing for 14 days?

    • 31 July 2023 9:18 AM GMT

      CJI DY Chandrachud: But Mr SG, 14 days the police took to register the zero FIR.

    • 31 July 2023 9:18 AM GMT

      SG Mehta: We have nothing to hide. We're saying that your lordships can monitor the situation. Something coming from here or there will be hazardous.

    • 31 July 2023 9:17 AM GMT

      CJI: What was the police doing from 4th to 18th? An incident came to light that women are being paraded naked- atleast 2 were raped. What was the police doing?

    Next Story