J Mishra: Your claim is contrary. if they had... ... ED v. Mamata Banerjee Over I-PAC Raid : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing

J Mishra: Your claim is contrary. if they had intention to collect, they would have seized, but nothing seized.

Sibal: They could photograph it, did not have to seize it. Panchnama indicates nothing untoward happened at IPAC office or Prateek Jain's premise.

J Mishra: We have to examine.

Sibal: No no, let us demonstrate.

J Mishra: You can't restrain us from issuing notice!

Sibal: We can only convince.