J Amanullah- putting an extreme example, I go to a... ... Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 6]

J Amanullah- putting an extreme example, I go to a temple, my fundamental belief is that he is the Lord, he is my creator. He has created me, right? I am totally devoted. But there, I am told that, because of your birth or your lineage, for certain restrictions, permanently, you are not allowed to touch the deity. will the constitution to the rescue? the argument is there can't be a difference between the creator and his creation.

Suppose I am going and somebody throws mud, I clean myself, I have to be in a decent position to approach the deity in a pure way. that you can decide what purification means but then the permanent disability that I can't touch my creator, I am strongly believer of that. he is my creator. will the Constitution not come? Because ultimately, what you are projecting is that he is the god, he is the creator, but creation will not be able to touch the creator? To what extent you limit it?

And you say, no its totally [not possible]. Somebody, just because of birth, he can't and he can't change in this lifetime. So why only an archakas particularly? How should the constitution not come in with it? How does it defy? Justice because you think it is defied?