Shamshad: The Ismail Farooqui case, which Dr... ... Sabarimala Reference | Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 8]

Shamshad: The Ismail Farooqui case, which Dr Dhavan argued, in that case the issue was not where masjid was essential or not. I asked Mr what was the context, he said that since Masjid was demolished, muslims claimed their right that I can offer Namaz even in open

the majority said that since Namaz can also be offered in open, masjid is not essential. That parameter is completely wrong and that has been applied in subsequent cases.

 I am appearing in a case, which I lost in the Supreme Court, the parking of a temple was to be extended and 200 years old mosque was demolished for the extension of parking of the temple.