Raju: [reading to a statement of protected... ... Umar Khalid, Sharjeel, Gulfisha Fatima Bail : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing | Delhi Riots UAPA Case

Raju: [reading to a statement of protected witness] he wanted to deflect the responsibility to JCC. His role is corraborated with [another witness]. These are 164 statement.

Next point is- on admin of DPSG group- whatsapps groups and change of admin happened on 12.3.20. Before 12, he could send messages. They decided to delete everything on whatsapp, but before that he did. 11.4.20 they migrated to Signal. Important persons were removed from the group. Before arrests were made, he could post and delete.

12.3.20 changed group settings to allow only admins to send group. So the submission that he could not delete because he was not the admin is wrong.

Refers to Khalid's Bharat tere tukde tukde honge statement- the entire FIR, these anti-national slogans were raised was subject matter of FIR 110/2016. We have relied upon it in the chargesheet. Refers to a volume.

J Kumar: very difficult to maintain all this volume. It happens in supreme court only, in high courts its very beautiful running volumes. Our difficult starts with you two stop.

Raju: it was argued that witnesses are hearsay, he was not there. I will argue it is all wrong.