Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi: Syedna represented... ... Sabarimala Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 16]

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi: Syedna represented the community. [answering the issue raised by bench that the 1949 Act could have been read down instead of holding it unconstitutional in Sardar Syedna judgment] 5 pages of the judgment are devoted to the intervenor which the respondents are taking that he has power excommunication etc. I am an intervenor to the 1986 writ petition.

so called Board which is not registered, he died and its taken by another. the writ is abated, there is no person. finally, Syedna judgment is a very wrong bench and a very strong bar. Bar was represented by KM Munshi, member of the constituent assembly.