Sibal: I made a speech at Amaratavi and now look,... ... Umar Khalid, Sharjeel, Gulfisha Fatima Bail : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing | Delhi Riots UAPA Case

Sibal: I made a speech at Amaratavi and now look, they say permission was not given to give speech. In Maharashtra Act, the organiser would be punished for 1 years for not taking permission for the speech but I am not an accused yet they are citing this against me.

Somebody adds me to a whatsapp group where I have not sent a message and those who sent are not accused. they are citing this against me. See, only admins can send message, nadeem did and he is not an accused. 4 messages attributed to me are sent by someone else. Sometimes it happens that in congress party group, I am added and I get message but if someone says something, I can't be prosecuted for that.

At chandbagh, they say I am there but CDR analysis shows I am not. Petitioners location throughout are set out here- I only go to shaheen bagh at 11:31 and Saifi leaves before, and how can it be hatched- they relied to show we all met at 8.1.

Ratanlal FIR 65, my friend relied upon- I am not accused in this. He shows the video of another accused and this is again me- the death of the head constable. And in FIR 69, death of another constable, i am not an accused.

they say, I gave a speech in 2016-bharat ke tukde honge, it is not attributed to me.

J Kumar: who said it?

Sibal: some other student. they filed another chargesheet in 2016, in which it is said I did not say that speech. This kind of evidence.

Allegation that sharjeel Imam made MSJ group on suggest of Umar Khalid, the petitioner was added and he did not send a single message. In about 750 FIR, I am not an accused and in only FIR 101, I have been discharged- what is the conspiracy then? the charge is that because of my speech, the bombs are thrown so surely I should have been made accused in others.

Last thing I have to say- these are students, they agitate wrongly or rightly. In younger days, even we used to agitate and if we protest, these is no use of putting me in jail, convict me. you can't keep me incarcerated as if I am incarcerated for protesting. Singhvi read judgments after judgments where for overt acts and lesser years of incarceration, the court has granted bail.

There are judgments where trial courts have found that evidence has been fabricated, what credibility does the organisation have except motive? look at this judgment, on delhi special cell fabrication of evidence. 17 judgments on findings of fabrication and cases involving deadly riots.

Sibal concludes.