SG Mehta: on registration- argument was it was not... ... Waqf Amendment Act Challenge : Live Updates From Supreme Court [Hearing On Interim Order]

SG Mehta: on registration- argument was it was not mandatory. second, there was argument that there was no consequence. I have gone to root of the problem-British and Indian Gov tried to solve.

In 1923, first legislation governing regulation of waqf property-[says the property was misappropriated and people converted to Islam] this menace going for 102 years- I will tell why the 5 years of practice- [reads the Statement and Objects]-

Even Sharia Act, section 3 says you have to establish Muslim for it to apply