Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 11 of the A&C Act"

Limitation Period For Invoking Arbitration Cannot Be Extended By Consent: Delhi High Court
Review Of Judgment/Order Passed Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act Is Not Permissible: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Would Subsequent Agreement Cover Past Transactions ? Arbitrator To Decide: Delhi High Court
Non-Payment/Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty Cannot Render The Arbitration Agreement Invalid: Delhi High Court
Award Passed By A Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Is Non-Est, It Cannot Be A Bar To The Maintainability Of Petition Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act: Delhi High Court Reiterates
Conduct Of The Parties Can't Substitute Arbitration Agreement: Calcutta High Court
Notice Of Proceeding Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act Is A Mandatory Requirement: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Application Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act Is Maintainable Despite The Pendency Of Reference Before The MSME Council: Jharkhand High Court
The Arbitration Clause Contained In A Manual Issued By The Government As A Generic Guideline Is Not Binding: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Pre-Arbitration Reference To Adjudicator Is Only Directory, Not A Bar To The Appointment Of The Arbitrator: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Mere Pendency Of A Civil Suit Is Not An Absolute Bar To A Petition Under Section 11 Of The A&C Act: Bombay High Court
A Party Cannot Circumvent The Dispute Resolution Process After Agreeing On The Same: Gujarat High Court