Home
Lawyers & Law Firms
NRI Law
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Law Firms
Deal News
Law Firm Articles
Foreign Law Firms
Internships
Job Updates
Law Firm Events
SC Judgments
लाइव लॉ हिंदी
Law Schools
Call for Papers
Competitions
Interviews
Law School - Columns
Law School Articles
Moot Courts
News
School Admission
Seminars
Internships
Diploma/Certificate...
LLM/Phd
Law School Admission
Law School Cover Story
Law School Editors Pick
Placements
Scholarships/Fellowships
Top Corner Stories
IBC News
Tax
Arbitration
Events Corner
Sponsored
Top Stories
News Updates
Columns
Interviews
Foreign/International
RTI
Know the Law
Law Schools
Law Firms
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Events Corner
Videos
Sponsored
Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Round Ups
IBC News
Environment
Cartoons
Tax
Arbitration
Consumer Cases
X
Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 138"
[S. 202 CrPC] Evidence Of Complainant's Witnesses Can Be Taken On Affidavit, Absence Of Affidavit On Record May Vitiate Proceedings: Kerala HC
[S.138 NI Act] Must Examine Those With Direct Knowledge Of Transaction To Prove Allegations Of Cheque Dishonour: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Conviction
[S. 138 NI Act] Trial Court's Reasonably Formed Opinion Regarding Insufficient Funds Cannot Be Interdicted By Appellate Court: Kerala HC
S. 148 NI Act - Appellate Court Must Pass A Speaking Order To Order Deposit Of Minimum 20 % Compensation/Fine Amount: Kerala High Court
Issuing Cheque After Voluntarily Closing Bank Account Tantamounts To Offence Of Cheating Under IPC: Kerala High Court
Alleged Cheques Issued After Their Resignation: Kerala High Court Stays S 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Resigned Directors Of A Company
S.138 NI Act | Evidence Of Power Of Attorney Holder Not Credible Unless They Possess Due Knowledge Of The Transaction: Kerala High Court
Recent Pronouncements Related To Dishonour Of Cheques Under Section 138 Of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
S.138 NI Act | Dishonored Cheque Must Have Been Issued By Account Holder Under His Name & Sign For An Offence To Be Made Out: Meghalaya High Court
Director Can't Be Prosecuted U/S 138 Of Negotiable Instruments Act If Company Is Not Arraigned As Accused: Chhattisgarh High Court