Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 138 of NI Act"

[Cheque Dishonour] When Defence Of Accused Is Not Believable, Court Can Infer That He Issued A Cheque For The Said Transaction: Karnataka HC
NI Act Doesn't Prescribe Who Will Represent Company Which Is Complainant U/S 138, Can Be Represented By An Employee: Allahabad High Court
Cheque Dishonour | Onus On Accused To Prove Cheque Issued Towards Repayment Of Loan Was Misused By Complainant: Karnataka High Court
Cheque Dishonour | Wife Not Signatory, Cannot Be Held Liable For Cheque Signed & Given By Husband From Joint Account: Bombay High Court
Does Prosecution Under IPC After Filing Of 138 NI Act Complaint Amount To Double Jeopardy? Punjab & Haryana HC Explains
S.202 CrPC | Magistrate's Order Showing Application Of Mind Not Bad For “Absence Of Magic Words” About Prima Facie Satisfaction: Calcutta HC
Madras High Court Makes E-Filing Mandatory For District Courts Dealing With Cheque Bounce Cases
Not Proper To Shift Burden On Complainant To Prove NI Act Case Beyond ‘Reasonable Doubt’ When Accused Didn’t Respond To Statutory Notice: Gujarat HC
Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Cannot Be Imported To Deal With Complaints U/S 138 Negotiable Instruments Act: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
S. 138 NI Act | Proceedings Can’t Be Invalidated Merely Because Costs For Miscellaneous Expenses Claimed Alongwith Cheque Amount: Orissa High Court
Negotiable Instruments Act: All India High Courts Digest 2022
Cheque Bounce Complaint Filed Before Expiry Of 15 Days From Date Of Receipt Of Notice By Drawer Is Not Maintainable : Supreme Court