Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "#Section 156(3) CrPC"

Is Sanction Needed To Order Investigation Against Public Servant Under S.156(3) CrPC? Supreme Court Seeks Early Decision In Pending Reference
Affidavit Necessary With Application Under S.156(3) CrPC; Directions In 'Priyanka Srivastava v. State of UP' Mandatory: Supreme Court
Changes In BNSS To S.156(3) CrPC Power, Cognizance Of Complaints Against Public Servants, Sanction To Prosecute
'Putting Criminal Law In Motion Against Accused By Examining Only One Or Two Enquiry Witnesses Is Deprecated': Jharkhand HC
Criminality Cannot Be Fastened In Every Case For Mere Breach Of Contract: Jharkhand High Court
No Specific Allegation Or Privity Of Contract: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Criminal Proceedings Against Company Director
[Prevention Of Corruption Act] Private Complaint Against Public Servant Can't Be Forwarded For Investigation Without Sanction: Kerala High Court
S.156(3) CrPC | Necessary To Order Police Investigation In Cases Warranting Recovery, When Material Objects In Possession Of Accused: Kerala HC
Allahabad HC Quashes CJM's Order Rejecting Rape Victim's S. 156 (3) CrPC Plea For Police Probe, Remands Matter Back
Magistrate Has Duty To Ensure Fair Probe After Passing Order U/S 156 (3) CrPC: Allahabad High Court
Magistrate Shall Not Entertain Application U/s 156(3) CrPC If It Is Not Supported By Complainant's Affidavit: Supreme Court
Prior Sanction Required For Referring A Complaint Against Public Servants For Investigation U/S 156(3) CrPC: Calcutta High Court