Home
Lawyers & Law Firms
NRI Law
Supreme Court
Top Stories
News Updates
Columns
Interviews
Foreign/International
RTI
Know the Law
Law Schools
Law Firms
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Events Corner
Videos
Sponsored
Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Round Ups
IBC News
Environmental Law
Cartoons
Tax
Arbitration
Consumer Cases
X
Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 27 Evidence Act"
To Prove S.27 Evidence Act Statement, Investigating Officer Must Narrate What Accused Stated; Merely Exhibiting Memorandum Not Enough : Supreme Court
'Custody' Under S.27 Evidence Act Doesn't Mean Custody After Formal Arrest; Includes Any Kind Of Restraint Or Surveillance: Supreme Court
Section 27 Evidence Act | Recovery Of A Weapon From An Open Place Accessible To All Not Reliable : Supreme Court
Admitting Into Evidence Confessional Statements Made To Police U/S 25, 26 Evidence Act Vitiate Trial: Kerala High Court
Kerala HC Acquits Hindi Proficient Accused As Disclosure Statement U/S 27 Evidence Act Was Recorded In Malayalam, Translator Not Examined
S. 27 Evidence Act | Discovery Can't Be Proved Against Person If He Wasn't Accused Of Any Offence & Wasn't In Custody Of Police At The Time Of Confession: Supreme Court
S 27 Evidence Act | Disclosure Statements Cannot Be Sole Basis For Conviction : Supreme Court
Section 27 Evidence Act Statement Not Liable To Be Rejected Merely Because It Was Recorded In A Language Not Known To Accused Through Translator : Supreme Court
Causing Injury To Police, Snatching Away Their Weapons Amounts To Challenge To Rule Of Law: MP High Court Denies Bail In Robbery Case
Section 27 Of Evidence Act Is Attracted Even If Accused Isn't Arrested But Only Interrogated By Police: Allahabad High Court
S.134 Evidence Act | Testimony Of Single Eyewitness Can Form Basis For Conviction Provided It Is Of Sterling Quality: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Accused Need Not Be Under 'Formal Arrest' For Purpose Of Statement Given U/S 27 Evidence Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court
< Prev Page
Next Page >