Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act"

S.27 Evidence Act Can't Aid Prosecution If Recovery Isn't Proved To Be Based On Disclosure Of Accused : Supreme Court
Confession Of Accused Can't Be Proved Under S.27 Evidence Act, Only Statements Relating To Discovery Of Facts Admissible: Supreme Court
S. 27 Evidence Act | Discovery Of Facts Concerning Co-Accused Would Be Admissible To Establish Charge Of Conspiracy: Chhattisgarh HC
Confession U/S 27 Evidence Act Not Reliable Until There Is Discovery To Corroborate Its Veracity: Rajasthan High Court
Section 27 Evidence Act Vulnerable To Abuse, Courts Must Be Vigilant : Supreme Court
Four Conditions To Invoke Section 27 Of Indian Evidence Act : Supreme Court Explains
Rajesh and Another v. The State of MP : A Patently Erroneous Interpretation Of Section 27 Of Evidence Act By Supreme Court
“Section 27” Of The Evidence Act And The Verdict In “Pulukuri Kottaya” Continue To Elude The Comprehension Of Many Judges At All Levels
Weapon's Recovery From A Place Unknown To Everyone Underlines Confirmation Theory U/S 27 IEA: Allahabad High Court
Weapon's Recovery From Hiding Place Which Is In Exclusive Knowledge Of Accused Makes Such Recovery Absolutely Reliable: Allahabad HC
'Double Presumption Available In Favour Of Accused After Acquittal' : Supreme Court Restores Acquittal In Murder Case
Section 27 Recovery Must Satisfy Court's Conscience; Prosecution May At Times Take Advantage Of Custody Of Accused By Other Means : Supreme Court