Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Substantial Question of Law"

Workmen's Compensation Commissioner Last Authority For Deciding Claim On 'Facts'; Appeal Lies Only On 'Substantial Question Of Law': Rajasthan HC
Appeal Under Section 30 Of Workmen's Compensation Act Not Maintainable In Absence of Framing Any Substantial Question of Law: Rajasthan High Court
Requirement To Frame Substantial Question Of Law In Second Appeal Not A Mere Formality, But Meant To Be Adhered To: Supreme Court
Instead Of Independently Formulating Substantial Question Of Law Arising In Appeal, Judges Often Copy Down Grounds From Pleadings: Madras High Court
High Court Not Required To Frame Substantial Question Of Law While Dismissing Second Appeal: Supreme Court
Substantial Question Of Law & Second Appeal Jurisdiction: SC Summarizes Principles Relating To Section 100 CPC [Read Judgment]
[Section 260A Income Tax Act] HC Can Only Answer Substantial Question Framed By It: SC [Read Judgment]
HC Cannot Allow Second Appeal Without Formulating Substantial Question Of Law, Reiterates SC [Read Order]
Mere Error In Framing Substantial Question Of Law Would Not Render A Judgment In Second Appeal To Be Set Aside: SC [Read Judgment]
'Substantial Question Of Law' Requirement Not Mandatory In Second Appeals Before Punjab & Haryana HC: SC [Read Order]
Second Appeal: Obligatory For HC To Frame Substantial Question Of Law Even If Lower Courts' Findings Are Perverse Per Se, Rules SC
Discussion On Maintainability Of Second Appeal Beyond Substantial Question Of Law