'Industry' Definition Reference : Live Updates From Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench [Day 2]

Update: 2026-03-18 05:14 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
Live Updates - Page 6
2026-03-18 09:21 GMT

Jaising- I was rather surprised. Traditionally, over the years, we have faced private employers but today who has come before you? All the States. Where are the private employers?

2026-03-18 09:21 GMT

Jaising- if we look at triple test from this point of view, you will find that a norm has been laid down to decide what to include in industry and what not to include. Now, much has been said about charity-pause here for a moment-who are the petitioners before you?

2026-03-18 09:21 GMT

Jaising-disputes between employer-employee, employee-employee are not unknown. classically they arise when which union is to be recognised.

2026-03-18 09:20 GMT

Jaising- J Iyer traditionally represented the textile association of manufactures in the industrial courtroom in Bombay and very often we had occasion to appear against each other

2026-03-18 09:20 GMT

Jaising- my submission is there is no ambiguity in the definition of industry. But assuming is if there is, nobody bothered to clarity what is it until J Datta pointed out that the definition is in two parts.

2026-03-18 09:19 GMT

Jaising- if we get thrown out of ID Act, we go nowhere. I conceive that if I get access by another statute, I have no complaints. There the question is of throwing us out.

2026-03-18 09:19 GMT

Jaising-it says s. 11a gives security of employment and record evidence de novo and depart from punishment imposed by the employer. Doctrine of proportionality can to be introduced

CJI: that is the most imp component, even the tribunal can reduce the dismissal of removal to minor punishment, this power is not even given to the HC in 226

2026-03-18 09:19 GMT

Jaising- there was a tangential challenge to the introduction of S. 11 A into the ID Act, which granted the relief of reinstatement. this court then explained the difference between jurisdiction of a labour court and the jurisdiction of a civil court.

2026-03-18 09:19 GMT

Jaising- it does not create any major substantive rights. it gives me the access to justice in relation to unfair dismissals, in relation to victimisation, in relation to mala fide dismissals. This is what this court has said. And, I will place the judgment before you how the law came to be challenged after S. 11A was introduced- Workman of Firestone v Management (1973)

2026-03-18 09:19 GMT

Jaising- my submission is every democratic society is duty bound to give access to justice in a judicial forum and all that the ID Act is to give me that access.

Similar News