No Re-NEET, NEET-UG Not Cancelled : Live Updates From Supreme Court [July 23]
SG: Canara Bank papers were distributed at 12 centres. Out of 12 centres, 4 centres replaced the papers with SBI papers, thus 8 centres question paper from Canara Bank was used.
CJI: what about those who were given the Canara Bank paper ?
SG submitted that a proportionate formula similar to CLAT was applied
SG: same methodology was applied , based on what they scored and the time lost
CJI: everybody did not get same compensatory marks ?
SG: No
SG: so the student was given a choice to accept the results minus the compensatory marks. So student had a choice why would I take a chance and score less in restest or gamble by appearing again.
SG: but nothing but turn on this my lord, why do only 813 appear? suppose I am a student and I got only 2.5 hours and did not complete my paper, I am a Brilliant student (let's suppose). I will not choose to go for a chance of a re-test. The option was either you accept your result given in less time or you perform a re-test.
SG : But out of 1563 only 813 appeared
CJI: why were they did not given full time ?
SG: essentially because of the wrong paper been given initially ...
CJI: they were given either the Canara Bank paper or maybe those with different medium of instruction also
SG: they were given grace marks initially. thereafter re-test was done, from 6 centres.
CJI: these are the candidates who got compensatory marks for getting the wrong paper?
SG: no they could not get the 3.2 hours, full time
SG: we taken 56000 and 1.8Lakhs because the petitioners only argued on that basis
CJI; we would like to see the 1563 candidates