Uddhav Thackeray vs Eknath Shinde : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing In Shiv Sena Case [March 1]

Update: 2023-03-01 05:32 GMT

A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases related to rift in Shiv Sena.A bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud will hear the matter. Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.The bench started hearing the matter on merits from February 21. On February 16, it had decided to defer a decision on the...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will continue hearing today the cases related to rift in Shiv Sena.

A bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud will hear the matter. Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha are the other members of the bench.

The bench started hearing the matter on merits from February 21. On February 16, it had decided to defer a decision on the preliminary issue of larger bench reference by choosing to determine it along with the merits of the case.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal completed his submissions for the Uddhav side over three days. Senior Advocate Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi commenced his arguments for Uddhav side on February 23. Reports of the previous hearings can be read here, here, here, here, herehere, here and here.

Follow this page for live-updates


Live Updates
2023-03-01 10:27 GMT

The hearing to resume tomorrow.

2023-03-01 10:10 GMT

Kaul: What was the hurry? That during the weekend you want the replies to be filed! That's why we moved to this court by 32.

2023-03-01 10:09 GMT

Kaul: They didn't even follow the basic norms of natural justice.

2023-03-01 10:08 GMT

Kaul: The scope for disqualification being misused is enormous and that is what is sought to be done here.

2023-03-01 10:08 GMT

Kaul: Whether Nabam applies or not applies, the court said only on principle of natural justice give them more time because the rules provide 7 days and they only got the weekend.

2023-03-01 10:08 GMT

CJI DY Chandrachud: If Nabam Rebia didn't exist, the Speaker would be entitled to decide disqualification. If he had decided, 39 would have gone out. Then the government would have fallen.

Kaul: Exactly.

2023-03-01 10:06 GMT

Kaul: It's wrong to say that Shinde wouldn't have gotten support. Till he is disqualified, he continues to be a member.

Justice Shah: CJI is saying what if he was disqualified:

Kaul: Speaker couldn't have gone ahead with the disqualification because of Nabam Rebia.

2023-03-01 10:03 GMT

Kaul: Your own people were not there to support your government! That's why this number comes to 99. 13 from MVA abstained. Because you had lost the support.

2023-03-01 10:03 GMT

Kaul: In the chart I gave - Quite apart from removing the 39, they were running from actuals. 13 of them were their own people. That's how they came to 99.

2023-03-01 10:00 GMT

Kaul: These are all hypotheticals.

CJI DY Chandrachud: Not all is hypothetical. We all know what happened and what led to this.

Tags:    

Similar News