Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1463 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1512NOMINAL INDEXJaya Bachchan v. Bollywood Bubble & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1463 Union of India & Anr. vs. Amit Kumar Yadav & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1464 DAZN Limited & Anr. v. 9GOALS.IO & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1465 Mankind Pharma Limited v. De Harbien Life Sciences Private Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del)...
Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1463 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1512
NOMINAL INDEX
Jaya Bachchan v. Bollywood Bubble & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1463
Union of India & Anr. vs. Amit Kumar Yadav & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1464
DAZN Limited & Anr. v. 9GOALS.IO & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1465
Mankind Pharma Limited v. De Harbien Life Sciences Private Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1466
Capital Foods Private Limited v. KRS Multipro Private Limited & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1467
ITC Limited & Anr v. Bukhara Inn 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1468
Dabur India Limited v. Patanjali Ayurved Limited & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1469
Techsync v. The Superintendent of Customs SIIB ACC Imports and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1470
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AND ALLIED SCIENCES (IHBAS) versus MI2C SECURITIES AND FACILITIES PVT LTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1471
M/s Vedanta Ltd v. ACIT Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1472
MOHAMED ALI JINNAH v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1473
MEHMOOD PRACHA v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1474
Munna Lal Yadav v. Department Of Empowerment Of Persons With Disabilities & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1475
Ravi Mohan Studios Private Limited vs Indospirit Beverages Private Limited & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1476
Manmohan Gaind v. Negolice India Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1477
Upendra Nath Dalai v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1478
AMRIT KAUR v. ASI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1479
Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Railways vs. Sh. R.K. Mittal 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1480
Shujaat Ali v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1481
Kemexel Ecommerce Pvt. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 105, Zone 4, Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1482
XY v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1483
KAILASH WATI v. STATE OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1484
Santosh Kumar Suri v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1485
PJ v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1486
Gameloft Software Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax, Range 152 & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1487
SMT. RAJESH RATHI v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1488
Abid v. State (and connected matters) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1489
Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd vs American Dream 11 Fantasy Sports Private Limited and Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1490
Renew Wind Energy (Ap2) Pvt Ltd v. SECI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1491
RAJIV SAREEN v. M/S DIVYANSHU ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1492
M/s Mathur Polymers v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1493
Changsha Sinocare Inc & Anr v. Mr. Rajesh Kumar & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1494
Sunil Kumar Gupta v. Commissioner Of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1495
Raj Kumar Gupta v. UoI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1496
Devender Singh v. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Delhi West 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1497
M/S Shiva Enterprises v. Principal Commissioner, Department Of Trade And Taxes, GNCTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1498
M/S Swarn Cosmetics (India) v. Union Of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1499
Castrol Limited & Ors v MR Ali Hussain Amir Ali Namdar & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1500
Toshniwal Electricals Pvt Ltd Through Its Director Mukund Maheshwari v. The Principal Commissioner Of Central Tax Delhi North & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1501
Jiostar India Private Limited v. Cricfy TV & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1502
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR v. POONAM MALIK & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1503
BSNL v. Commissioner Of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1504
DIDAR SINGH & ANR v. STATE (GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1505
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Freight India Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner, Cgst-Delhi-South & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1506
Mala Sahni Seth & Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1507
GMG Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. v. Directorate General Of GST Intelligence HQ & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1508
Puneet Batra vs. UOI & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1509
M/S IMS Mercantiles Ltd v. Union Of India & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1510
Sushil Sharma v. Commissioner Of Customs [Export] 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1511
Varian Medical Systems International India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1512
Title: Jaya Bachchan v. Bollywood Bubble & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1463
The Delhi High Court passed an interim order protecting the personality rights of actor and Member of Parliament (Rajya Sabha) Jaya Bachchan
Case Name : Union of India & Anr. vs. Amit Kumar Yadav & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1464
A Division bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Madhu Jain held that administrative delay in the employees' joining created a shortfall in their qualifying service for promotion. Hence the employees were eligible for promotion as the delay was attributable to the administrative process of UOI and not to any fault of the officers themselves.
Case Title: DAZN Limited & Anr. v. 9GOALS.IO & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1465
The Delhi High Court has restrained 26 websites from illegally streaming live matches of the ongoing 'Serie A Championship', after finding that they were broadcasting the content without authorization from DAZN Limited which is the exclusive rights holder of the sporting event.
Case Title : Mankind Pharma Limited v. De Harbien Life Sciences Private Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1466
The Delhi High Court has restrained De Harbien Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, from using the marks “NEFROKIND” and “SILOKIND.” The Court found these marks deceptively similar to Mankind Pharma Limited's well-known trademarks “MANKIND,” “KIND,” and other “KIND” formative marks.
Case Title: Capital Foods Private Limited v. KRS Multipro Private Limited & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1467
In yet another order granting relief to Ching's Secret sauces maker Capital Foods Pvt. Ltd., the Delhi High Court has once again stepped in to protect the company's trademark “Schezwan Chutney.”
Case Title: ITC Limited & Anr v. Bukhara Inn
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1468
The Delhi High Court has restrained a city based hotel, Bukhara Inn, from using the name “Bukhara,” ruling that it infringed ITC Limited's well-known trademark associated with its iconic restaurant, Bukhara, at ITC Maurya, New Delhi.
Case Title: Dabur India Limited v. Patanjali Ayurved Limited & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1469
The Delhi High Court has barred Patanjali Ayurved from airing an advertisement that labeled all other Chyawanprash products as “dhoka” (deception), ruling that it constitutes commercial disparagement. The restriction will remain in place until the next hearing on February 26, 2026.
Case Title: Techsync v. The Superintendent of Customs SIIB ACC Imports and Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1470
The Delhi High Court has directed the CBIC (Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs) to conduct inter-ministerial consultation in respect of coming up with a uniform policy permitting or prohibiting the import of products declared as 'body massagers' or sex toys.
Case Title: INSTITUTE OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AND ALLIED SCIENCES (IHBAS) versus MI2C SECURITIES AND FACILITIES PVT LTD
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1471
The Delhi High Court held that a clerical or typographical error in the title of an arbitral award can be corrected even after 30 day limitation period provided under section 33 of the Arbitration Act if the mistake originated from the tribunal itself and not from the parties.
Case title: M/s Vedanta Ltd v. ACIT Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1472
In granting relief to Vedanta Limited, the Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the the Income Tax Department for initiation of reassessment action against the Copper manufacturer, over alleged fraudulent availment of Input tax credit worth over ₹424 Crore.
Title: MOHAMED ALI JINNAH v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1473
The Delhi High Court has observed that an undertrial's desire to console ailing parents, is not, by itself, a ground for emergent parole under the Delhi Prison Rules.
Title: MEHMOOD PRACHA v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1474
The Election Commission of India (ECI) informed the Delhi High Court that the CCTV footage of Lok Sabha Elections 2024 is not longer in the custody of the seven District Election Officers (DEOs) in the national capital as the same stands destroyed.
Justice Mini Pushkarna took the statement on record and disposed of an application filed by Advocate Mehmood Pracha last year, seeking preservation of the video footage.
Case title: Munna Lal Yadav v. Department Of Empowerment Of Persons With Disabilities & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1475
The Delhi High Court has held that recommendations of the Chief Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities (CCPwD) have to be generally followed by the government authorities.
Case Title: Ravi Mohan Studios Private Limited vs Indospirit Beverages Private Limited & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1476
The Delhi High Court refused to stay the operation of a single-judge order that had restrained actor Ravi Mohan's production house from using the title 'BRO CODE' for its upcoming Tamil film, following a trademark dispute with Indospirit Beverages Private Limited, the maker of the alcoholic beverage 'BROCODE'.
Case title: Manmohan Gaind v. Negolice India Pvt. Ltd.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1477
The Delhi High Court has held that Post-Dated Cheques (PDCs), issued as security for financial liability, can mature into an actual outstanding liability, thus attracting provisions under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, if dishonoured.
Title: Upendra Nath Dalai v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1478
The Delhi High Court rapped a litigant for repeatedly filing petitions challenging certain provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023, despite dismissal of his earlier pleas seeking similar reliefs.
Case: AMRIT KAUR v. ASI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1479
The Delhi High Court has directed the authorities to consider a complaint alleging illegal encroachment near the Qutub Minar complex in Delhi's Mehrauli area.
Case Name : Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Railways vs. Sh. R.K. Mittal
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1480
A Division bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav held that non-supply of the inquiry officer's report to the delinquent employee before imposition of penalty vitiates the disciplinary proceedings unless the employer provides valid justification for such omission.
Title: Shujaat Ali v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1481
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a PIL seeking a free and fair probe into three FIRs registered overI love Muhammad” posters displayed by individuals in Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh on the occasion of Milad-un-Nabi, commemorating the birth and passing of the Prophet.
Case title: Kemexel Ecommerce Pvt. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 105, Zone 4, Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1482
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that Section 61(2) of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 bars further action against an assessee, including any demand under Section 73.
Case title: XY v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1483
The Delhi High Court has prima facie observed that an informer, who apprises the Department about evasion of goods and services tax by an entity, cannot seek reward for sharing such information as a matter of right.
Title: KAILASH WATI v. STATE OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1484
The Delhi High Court has directed the State Authorities to frame rules to cater to situations where convicts are unable to surrender even after lapse of the period of release on parole or furlough, due to being incapacitated by virtue of their health or age.
Case title: Santosh Kumar Suri v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1485
The Delhi High Court criticized the Income Tax Department for an over 2-year delay in implementing an ITAT order, directing it to reconsider the demand raised against an assessee.
Title: PJ v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1486
The Delhi High Court granted extension of time to surrender to a lawyer whose anticipatory bail was cancelled over allegations of raping a young woman advocate.
Case title: Gameloft Software Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax, Range 152 & Anr
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1487
The Delhi High Court has called upon the Goods and Services Tax Department to expeditiously process the refund applications filed by registered persons/ entities.
Title: SMT. RAJESH RATHI v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1488
The Delhi High Court has observed that while child care leave (CCL) granted to women government employees is not an entitlement but the same cannot be denied arbitrarily or mechanically.
Case title: Abid v. State (and connected matters)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1489
The Delhi High Court has held that ocular evidence, duly corroborated by medical evidence, is sufficient for a murder conviction, even if the motive of the crime is not fully established.
Case Title: Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd vs American Dream 11 Fantasy Sports Private Limited and Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1490
The Delhi High Court has directed American Dream 11, a US-based fantasy gaming company, to take down or block all its social media pages and profiles that allegedly infringe the trademark Dream11 on platforms such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), LinkedIn, and Instagram.
Case Title – Renew Wind Energy (Ap2) Pvt Ltd v. SECI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1491
In a noteworthy judgment for the renewable energy sector, the Delhi High Court has observed that the power of Central Electricity Commission (“CERC”) under Section 79(1)(f), Electricity Act to refer parties to arbitration is wider than its power to adjudicate.
Title: RAJIV SAREEN v. M/S DIVYANSHU ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1492
The High Court of Delhi, while clarifying the limits of the jurisdictional bar under section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, has held that a civil suit seeking cancellation of a registered Sale Deed is maintainable before a civil court, even where the property is simultaneously subject to proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The ruling reinforces that DRTs cannot adjudicate disputes concerning the validity or cancellation of registered conveyances, which continue to lie exclusively within the domain of civil courts.
Case title: M/s Mathur Polymers v. Union of India & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1493
The Delhi High Court has held that under Section 169(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, a communication sent to an email address provided at the time of GST registration is adequate service of a decision, order, summons or notice or any other communication.
Delhi High Court Restrains Manufacture, Sale of Glucose Test Strips Copying Chinese Company Sinocare
Case Title: Changsha Sinocare Inc & Anr v. Mr. Rajesh Kumar & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1494
The Delhi High Court has temporarily restrained several Indian firms from manufacturing, marketing, or selling blood glucose test strips or any other medical devices under the brand names “Safe AQ” and “Safe Accu”, after Chinese medical device maker Changsha Sinocare Inc. raised objection.
Case title: Sunil Kumar Gupta v. Commissioner Of Customs
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1495
The Delhi High Court has clarified that a traveller, whose goods are seized by the Customs, is not liable to pay a redemption fine or penalty for the release of goods if the Department failed to issue a show cause notice within the statutory timeframe.
Case title: Raj Kumar Gupta v. UoI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1496
The Delhi High Court slammed a trader, allegedly involved in clandestine manufacture of pan masala to evade tax and recovery of ₹70 lakh from his premises, for his failure to cooperate in the probe.
Case title: Devender Singh v. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Delhi West
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1497
The Delhi High Court has held that where fraudulent availment of tax by a fake firm comes to light, penalties can be imposed on the person behind the bogus operations.
Case title: M/S Shiva Enterprises v. Principal Commissioner, Department Of Trade And Taxes, GNCTD
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1498
In an unusual turn of events at the Delhi High Court, an “innocuous” petition filed by a trader seeking cancellation of its GST registration unravelled fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit worth lakhs.
Case title: M/S Swarn Cosmetics (India) v. Union Of India & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1499
The Central Goods and Services Tax Department recently explained to the Delhi High Court the process its officers follow when uploading any show cause notice or order on the GST portal. The explanation was tendered in response to a plea filed before the Court, challenging the legality of a demand order on the ground that the impugned SCN and the impugned order were not duly signed either physically or digitally.
Delhi High Court Permanently Bars Lubricant Maker From Using Castrol-Like Trademarks And Packaging
Case Title: Castrol Limited & Ors v MR Ali Hussain Amir Ali Namdar & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1500
The Delhi High Court has permanently restrained ZRH Lubes, an automative lubricant maker from using marks such as CREMESTROL, ACTION, MADMAXX ACTION logo, and packaging, after finding them deceptively similar to Castrol Limited's registered trademarks and trade dress.
Case title: Toshniwal Electricals Pvt Ltd Through Its Director Mukund Maheshwari v. The Principal Commissioner Of Central Tax Delhi North & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1501
The Delhi High Court has held that the Courts must, while dealing with cases involving fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit, balance the interest of trader with that of burden on State exchequer due to tax evasion.
Case Title: Jiostar India Private Limited v. Cricfy TV & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1502
The Delhi High Court has ordered several rogue mobile apps and websites to stop illegally streaming the upcoming South Africa and New Zealand cricket tours of India, protecting Jiostar India's exclusive broadcast rights. The injunction will remain in force until March 3, 2026.
Title: DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR v. POONAM MALIK & other connected matter
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1503
The Delhi High Court slammed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for freezing bank accounts of a woman on mere suspicion, while setting aside the agency's orders calling them “cryptic” in nature.
Case title: BSNL v. Commissioner Of Customs
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1504
The Delhi High Court has allowed BSNL (Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited) to belatedly challenge the Rs. 12,63,01,812/- imposed upon it by the Customs Department for misdeclaration of imported goods.
Title: DIDAR SINGH & ANR v. STATE (GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1505
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a husband and a son for murdering a woman by setting her on fire, holding that her dying declarations were consistent, voluntary and free from suspicion.
Case title: C.H. Robinson Worldwide Freight India Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner, Cgst-Delhi-South & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1506
The Delhi High Court has held that the time limit set out under 73(2) of the Goods and Services Tax Act for issuance of show cause notice in relation to alleged short payment of tax, etc. is mandatory in nature, and cannot be excused on account of technical glitches on GST portal.
Case title: Mala Sahni Seth & Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1507
The Delhi High Court has prima facie observed that the Delhi Development Authority cannot levy GST on conversion of property from leasehold to freehold.
Case title: GMG Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. v. Directorate General Of GST Intelligence HQ & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1508
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with an order passed by the Principal Additional Director General, Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) provisionally attaching the bank accounts of a trader.
Case Name: Puneet Batra vs. UOI & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1509
The Delhi High Court has issued notice in the application by the GST Department seeking the handing over of the parsed hard drives of the seized Central Processing Unit (CPU) of an advocate, which is in possession of the IT Officers of the Court, for further examination.
In doing so, the Court has instructed the presence of representatives from both sides, including a Court officer, and directed the submission of parsed data and hard drives to the Court.
Case title: M/S IMS Mercantiles Ltd v. Union Of India & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1510
The Delhi High Court criticised the GST Department for demanding tax on the total turnover of a company, despite figures of the actual sales being available with it.
Case title: Sushil Sharma v. Commissioner Of Customs [Export]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1511
The Delhi High Court refused to show any leniency to two employees of a Customs House Clearing Agent (CHA), found involved in smuggling of cigarettes worth Rs.3,40,74,000/-.
Case title: Varian Medical Systems International India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1512
The Delhi High Court has quashed the Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued to a company before conducting audit, holding that the authorities violated principles of natural justice by issuing the SCN before expiry of time granted to respond to the pre-SCN.