Orissa High Court Orders ₹30,000 Compensation For Man's Prima Facie Illegal Arrest Through Forged NBW

Update: 2026-07-31 07:58 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
story

The Orissa High Court has ordered payment of ₹30,000 as compensation to a 63-year-old man after finding that he was prima facie illegally arrested and detained on the basis of a counterfeit non-bailable warrant (NBW). [2026 LiveLaw (Ori) 88]The Court also directed separate enquiries by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (SDJM), Bhubaneswar and the Deputy Commissioner of Police...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Orissa High Court has ordered payment of ₹30,000 as compensation to a 63-year-old man after finding that he was prima facie illegally arrested and detained on the basis of a counterfeit non-bailable warrant (NBW). [2026 LiveLaw (Ori) 88]

The Court also directed separate enquiries by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (SDJM), Bhubaneswar and the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Cuttack into the circumstances leading to the illegal arrest.

Expressing serious concern over such misuse resulting in curtailment of liberty of a senior citizen, the Bench of Justice Radha Krishna Pattanaik observed–

“When the report of the learned court below and such an affidavit as at Flag-15 reveal that someone played mischief in the issuance of NBW/A which ultimately led to the arrest of the petitioner and admittedly, resulted in his illegal detention, this Court is inclined to direct the learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar to hold an enquiry in to the same and to take necessary action in that regard.”

The petitioner alleged that he was arrested from his furniture shop near Cuttack Chandi Mandir Chhak on May 12, 2026, by police personnel from Lalbag Police Station on the strength of a fabricated non-bailable warrant purportedly issued in C.T. Case No. 1209 of 2001 under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code.

According to the petitioner, he was produced before the SDJM, Bhubaneswar and released later the same day. He further claimed that he was made to sign several blank sheets during the process. The petitioner asserted that he was neither an accused nor the informant in the case in which the warrant was purportedly issued.

Aggrieved by his alleged illegal arrest and detention, he approached the High Court seeking action on his complaint against the police officials concerned and compensation for the violation of his liberty.

Pursuant to an earlier order, the SDJM, Bhubaneswar submitted a report stating that no such non-bailable warrant dated November 20, 2024 had been issued against the petitioner. The report further revealed that the petitioner was neither an accused nor the informant in the case. It also noted that the case was registered as a G.R. case, whereas the forged warrant referred to a C.T. case, indicating that the warrant was fabricated.

The police, in a compliance affidavit, stated that the warrant bearing a counterfeit court seal had been received through Speed Post and was executed on that basis, denying any wrongdoing at the police station level.

Taking note of the SDJM's report and the police affidavit, the High Court held that a detailed enquiry was necessary into the issuance of the counterfeit warrant as well as the petitioner's arrest. It directed the SDJM, Bhubaneswar to inquire into the circumstances surrounding the forged warrant and the DCP, Cuttack to conduct a threadbare enquiry into the arrest made on the basis of the counterfeit warrant.

The Court further awarded ₹30,000 as compensation to the petitioner, observing that his illegal arrest and detention stood prima facie proved. It clarified that the amount would be recoverable from the police officials, court staff, or any other persons ultimately found responsible, depending on the outcome of the enquiries.

Case Title: Bikram Mohapatra v. State of Odisha & Ors.

Case No: CRLMP No. 790 of 2026

Date of Order: July 23, 2026

Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. R.K. Routray, Advocate

Counsel for the State: Ms. Babita Sahu, Additional Government Advocate

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Ori) 88

Click Here To Read/Download Order

Tags:    

Similar News