Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 162 CrPC"

Prosecution Cannot Contradict A Court Witness With Previous Statements Made To Police; But Court Can : Supreme Court
Contradiction” Under Section 145 Of The Evidence Act (Section 148 Of BSA) And Under The Proviso To Section 162 (1) Cr.P.C. (Section 181 (1) Of BNSS)
Panchnama Inadmissible In Court Where Witnesses Merely Acted As Attestors And Did Not Disclose How Objects Were Discovered: Supreme Court
Trial Courts Must Shed Their Inertia & Ask Questions To Witnesses In Appropriate Cases To Sift Grain From Chaff: Allahabad HC
Section 162 CrPC Does Not Prevent A Trial Court From Putting Questions To Witnesses Suo Motu To Contradict Them : Supreme Court
Prima Facie Tenancy Not Forged: Bombay High Court Refuses To Appoint Court Receiver For Prime Mumbai Property In Dispute With Kuwaiti Royalty
'Arnab Goswami & Amish Devgan' Judgments Won't Apply When Separate FIRs Filed In Separate Incidents Under Same Offence: Allahabad HC
Bar U/s 162(1) CrPC Applies To A Letter Given Or Sent To Police Officer By A Person After The Commencement Of Investigation: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]
Who Is a “Police Officer” To Whom A Confession By An Accused Is Tabooed ?