Advocates With Ten Years Experience Can Be Appointed As Judicial Members Of Various Tribunals: Centre Amends Tribunal Rules

Update: 2021-07-01 14:11 GMT

The Central Government has amended the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 enabling appointment of Advocates with ten years experience as Judicial Members of various Tribunals.The Amendment was notified yesterday (30th June) and has come into force. In November, last year, the Supreme Court...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Central Government has amended the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 enabling appointment of Advocates with ten years experience as Judicial Members of various Tribunals.

The Amendment was notified yesterday (30th June) and has come into force.  

In November, last year, the Supreme Court had observed that the exclusion of Advocates in 10 out of 19 tribunals, for consideration as judicial members is contrary to the judgments in Union of India v. Madras Bar Association (2010) and Madras Bar Association v. Union of India. The court had opined that, since the qualification for an advocate of a High Court for appointment as a Judge of a High Court is only 10 years, the experience at the bar should be on the same lines for being considered for appointment as a judicial member of a Tribunal.

The amendment makes the following changes to schedule of the Rules which specifies the qualification for appointment of the Chairman, Chairperson, President, Vice-Chairman, Vice- Chairperson, Vice-President, Presiding Officer, Accountant Member, Administrative Member, Judicial Member, Expert Member, Law Member, Revenue Member, Technical Member or Member of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal or, as the case may be, Authority.

[Only changed portions reproduced, changes are highlighted] 

Income-tax Appellate Tribunal under the Income tax Act, 1961 

A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judicial Member, unless,–– (a) he has, for a combined period of ten years, been a District Judge and Additional District Judge; or (b) he has been a member of the Indian Legal Service with ten years of experience in litigation and has held a post of Additional Secretary or any equivalent or higher post for two years; or (c) he has been an advocate for ten years with substantial experience in litigation under Income-tax laws in Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court.

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under the Customs Act, 1962

A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judicial Member, unless, — (a) he has, for a combined period of ten years, been a District Judge and Additional District Judge; or (b) he has been a member of the Indian Legal Service with ten years of experience in litigation and has held a post of Additional Secretary or any equivalent or higher post for two years; or (c) he has been an advocate for ten years with substantial experience in litigation under indirect tax laws in Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court

Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunal Act,

A person shall not be qualified for appointment,– (a) as a Judicial Member, unless he,– (i) is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court; or (ii) has, for one year, held the post of Secretary to the Government of India in the Department of Legal Affairs or the Legislative Department including Member –Secretary, Law Commission of India; or (iii) has, for two years, held a post of Additional Secretary to the Government of India in the Department of Legal Affairs or Legislative Department; or (iv) has, for a combined period of ten years, been a District Judge and Additional District Judge; or (v) has, for ten years, been an advocate with substantial experience in litigation in service matters in Central Administrative Tribunal, Armed Forces Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court.

Railway Claims Tribunal

Judicial member qualification:(a) is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court; or (b) has, for a combined period of ten years, been a District Judge and Additional District Judge; or (c) has been an advocate for ten years with substantial experience in litigation in claim settlements pertaining to damage to life and property.

Securities Appellate Tribunal

Judicial member qualification: (i) is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court; or (ii) has been an advocate for ten years with substantial experience in litigation in matters relating to financial sector before Securities Exchange Board of India, Securities Appellate Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Judicial member qualification: (a) is or has been a Judge of a High Court; or (b) is a Judicial Member of the National Company Law Tribunal for five years; or (c) has been an advocate for ten years with substantial experience in litigation in matters relating to company affairs before National Company Law Tribunal, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court.

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity 

Judicial member qualification: (a) is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court; or (b) has, for a combined period of ten years, been a District Judge and Additional District Judge; or (c) has been an advocate for ten years with substantial experience in litigation in matters relating to power sector before Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, High Court or Supreme Court.

Armed Forces Tribunal

Judicial member qualification: (a) is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court; or (b) has, for ten years, been an advocate with substantial experience in litigation in service matters in Central Administrative Tribunal , Armed Forces Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court.

National Green Tribunal 

(a) is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court; or (b) has, for a combined period of ten years, been a District Judge and Additional District Judge; or (c)has, for ten years, been an advocate with substantial experience in litigation in matters relating to environment and forest in National Green Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court.

House Rent Allowance Rule Amended

With effect from the 1st January, 2021, the Chairman, Chairperson, President, Vice Chairman, Vice Chairperson or Vice President shall have option to avail of accommodation to be provided by the Central Government as per the rules for the time being in force or entitled to house rent allowance subject to a limit of Rs. one lakh fifty thousand rupees per month and the Presiding Offices and Members shall have option to avail of accommodation to be provided by the Central Government as per the rules for the time being in force or entitled to house rent allowance subject to a limit of Rs.one lakh twenty-five thousand rupees per month.

Search-cum-Selection Committee

As per the amended Rules, Search-cum-Selection Committee  means the Search-cum-Selection Committee referred to in sub-section (3) of section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017

Click here to Read/Download Notification 




Tags:    

Similar News