'Jana Nayagan' Movie Case : Live Updates From Madras High Court Hearing

2026-01-20 10:43 GMT

Parasaran: In 22 countries, we have received approval. It's not a practice to wait for certificate to announce money. If you see bollywood, they have already announced Durandhar 2

2026-01-20 10:42 GMT

Parasaran argues that none of the documents were uploaded on the website.
Parasaran: If they were sitting with a complaint on 29th, I've sent them mails on 29th, 30th but this was not informed to me

2026-01-20 10:39 GMT

Parasaran says that a unanimous decision was taken and even if one member takes a different decision, there is still a majority decision (of 4 members)
Parasaran: Now the minority decision is governing

2026-01-20 10:36 GMT

CJ: It looks like a brief order. And communication regarding this was made to you on 5th. You received a letter on 6th regarding a decision that was taken on 29th.

2026-01-20 10:32 GMT

Parasaran says what's there in the website is only an intimation that the movie is being sent to revising committee. Says the remarks were uploaded after filing of petition

2026-01-20 10:31 GMT

Parasaran: I'm saying that this is only the communication. Not the order. I cannot challenge a communication. The decision is not uploaded

2026-01-20 10:31 GMT

Court seeks clarity on what order was uploaded in e-cinepraman on 6th.
ASG says the decision was taken on 29th. Communication about the decision was made to producer on 5th through email and the communication was uploaded on 6th.

2026-01-20 10:29 GMT

CJ: The decision of board, which was termed as bad in law, was taken by the board on 6th? The same day you filed you filed petition?
Parasaran: Yes. But the order was passed after institution. I'm not privy to the order. They have not given it to me. Only communication

2026-01-20 10:24 GMT

Parasaran: All dates that I have presented are from their website. All records are their records. There's nothing new. That's one
Parasaran: Two, the member is required to give his opinion after viewing the movie. Even his subsequent opinion, it has been taken care of already through incisions

2026-01-20 10:22 GMT

CJ: You cannot say that it is an exceptional case and natural justice principles don't have to be followed
Parasaran: I'm not saying that it is exceptional case. I'm just saying that the facts are not disputed so was there a necessity of counter.

'Jana Nayagan' Movie Case : Live Updates From Madras High Court Hearing | CBFC Appeal against Vijay's Film

Parasaran: In 22 countries, we have received approval. It's not a practice to wait for certificate to announce money. If you see bollywood, they have already announced Durandhar 2

Parasaran argues that none of the documents were uploaded on the website.
Parasaran: If they were sitting with a complaint on 29th, I've sent them mails on 29th, 30th but this was not informed to me

Parasaran says that a unanimous decision was taken and even if one member takes a different decision, there is still a majority decision (of 4 members)
Parasaran: Now the minority decision is governing

CJ: It looks like a brief order. And communication regarding this was made to you on 5th. You received a letter on 6th regarding a decision that was taken on 29th.

Parasaran says what's there in the website is only an intimation that the movie is being sent to revising committee. Says the remarks were uploaded after filing of petition

Parasaran: I'm saying that this is only the communication. Not the order. I cannot challenge a communication. The decision is not uploaded

Court seeks clarity on what order was uploaded in e-cinepraman on 6th.
ASG says the decision was taken on 29th. Communication about the decision was made to producer on 5th through email and the communication was uploaded on 6th.

CJ: The decision of board, which was termed as bad in law, was taken by the board on 6th? The same day you filed you filed petition?
Parasaran: Yes. But the order was passed after institution. I'm not privy to the order. They have not given it to me. Only communication

Parasaran: All dates that I have presented are from their website. All records are their records. There's nothing new. That's one
Parasaran: Two, the member is required to give his opinion after viewing the movie. Even his subsequent opinion, it has been taken care of already through incisions

CJ: You cannot say that it is an exceptional case and natural justice principles don't have to be followed
Parasaran: I'm not saying that it is exceptional case. I'm just saying that the facts are not disputed so was there a necessity of counter.

Similar News

Supreme Court Allows Tamil Nadu To Substitute Acting DGP In UPSC DGP Selection Committee

Supreme Court Asks Centre If Sonam Wangchuk Had Opportunity To Watch Videos Cited In Detention Order

Court's Permission Needed To Arrest Accused For Offence Added After Grant Of Bail : Supreme Court

Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Restricted Till Filing Of Chargesheet Ordinarily: Supreme Court

'Picked Out Of The Blue': Allahabad HCBA Objects To SC Collegium's Proposed Names For Ad-Hoc Appointments, Writes To President, CJI

Supreme Court Allows Shifting Of Himachal Pradesh RERA Office From Shimla To Dharamshala

Arrears Of Disability Pension Broad-Banding In Armed Forces Cannot Be Restricted To 3 Years Before Claim: Supreme Court

SCBA Seeks Relaxation Of Waiting Period For Re-Applying After Rejection Or Deferment Of Senior Designation

Not Answering Investigating Officer's Questions Doesn't Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation To Deny Bail : Supreme Court

'Why Denigrate A Section?' : Supreme Court Objects To 'Ghooskhor Pandat' Name For Netflix Series, Asks Makers To Inform New Title

Substitution Of Arbitrator Is Not Mandatory On Termination Of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate Under S. 29A : Supreme Court

IPL Betting Case: Madras High Court Asks Cricketer MS Dhoni To Pay ₹10 Lakh For Translating CDs Involved In His ₹100 Crore Defamation Case

'Jana Nayagan' Movie Case : Live Updates From Madras High Court Hearing | CBFC Appeal against Vijay's Film

Parasaran: In 22 countries, we have received approval. It's not a practice to wait for certificate to announce money. If you see bollywood, they have already announced Durandhar 2

Parasaran argues that none of the documents were uploaded on the website. Parasaran: If they were sitting with a complaint on 29th, I've sent them mails on 29th, 30th but this was not informed to me

Parasaran says that a unanimous decision was taken and even if one member takes a different decision, there is still a majority decision (of 4 members) Parasaran: Now the minority decision is governing

CJ: It looks like a brief order. And communication regarding this was made to you on 5th. You received a letter on 6th regarding a decision that was taken on 29th.

Parasaran says what's there in the website is only an intimation that the movie is being sent to revising committee. Says the remarks were uploaded after filing of petition

Parasaran: I'm saying that this is only the communication. Not the order. I cannot challenge a communication. The decision is not uploaded

Court seeks clarity on what order was uploaded in e-cinepraman on 6th. ASG says the decision was taken on 29th. Communication about the decision was made to producer on 5th through email and the communication was uploaded on 6th.

CJ: The decision of board, which was termed as bad in law, was taken by the board on 6th? The same day you filed you filed petition? Parasaran: Yes. But the order was passed after institution. I'm not privy to the order. They have not given it to me. Only communication

Parasaran: All dates that I have presented are from their website. All records are their records. There's nothing new. That's one Parasaran: Two, the member is required to give his opinion after viewing the movie. Even his subsequent opinion, it has been taken care of already through incisions

CJ: You cannot say that it is an exceptional case and natural justice principles don't have to be followed Parasaran: I'm not saying that it is exceptional case. I'm just saying that the facts are not disputed so was there a necessity of counter.

Similar News

Parasaran argues that none of the documents were uploaded on the website.
Parasaran: If they were sitting with a complaint on 29th, I've sent them mails on 29th, 30th but this was not informed to me

Parasaran says that a unanimous decision was taken and even if one member takes a different decision, there is still a majority decision (of 4 members)
Parasaran: Now the minority decision is governing

Court seeks clarity on what order was uploaded in e-cinepraman on 6th.
ASG says the decision was taken on 29th. Communication about the decision was made to producer on 5th through email and the communication was uploaded on 6th.

CJ: The decision of board, which was termed as bad in law, was taken by the board on 6th? The same day you filed you filed petition?
Parasaran: Yes. But the order was passed after institution. I'm not privy to the order. They have not given it to me. Only communication

Parasaran: All dates that I have presented are from their website. All records are their records. There's nothing new. That's one
Parasaran: Two, the member is required to give his opinion after viewing the movie. Even his subsequent opinion, it has been taken care of already through incisions

CJ: You cannot say that it is an exceptional case and natural justice principles don't have to be followed
Parasaran: I'm not saying that it is exceptional case. I'm just saying that the facts are not disputed so was there a necessity of counter.