LiveLaw is introducing a new feature —'Breaking News Alerts' — designed to keep our readers instantly updated on the most important judicial developments. With real-time coverage of urgent pronouncements and orders from the Supreme Court and High Courts, this feature ensures that critical updates reach you the moment they happen. Whether it's a landmark ruling or an urgent interim...
LiveLaw is introducing a new feature —'Breaking News Alerts' — designed to keep our readers instantly updated on the most important judicial developments. With real-time coverage of urgent pronouncements and orders from the Supreme Court and High Courts, this feature ensures that critical updates reach you the moment they happen. Whether it's a landmark ruling or an urgent interim order, LiveLaw's Breaking News Alerts will deliver concise, authoritative updates right on the website, making sure you never miss a moment in India's fast-moving legal landscape.
Follow Today's Breaking News Alerts Here
#MadrasHighCourt has directed its registry not to number a defamation suit filed by #DMK against Ministers #AadhavArjuna and #CTRNirmalKumar till it hears an appeal filed by Minister Nirmal Kumar
On October 5th, a single judge had permitted the party to file a defamation suit with damages of Rs 1 crore against the Ministers for their alleged defamatory statements linking the party to Veeramani Pocso case
On October 6th, Minister CTR Nirmal Kumar preferred an appeal against single judge's order.
During the hearing, DMK's counsel had informed the court that the appeal could be heard on merits and that they would not number the suit till then
The bench recorded the submission and directed the registry not to number the suit till next hearing.
The appeal will be taken up for hearing on 13th October (tomorrow).
Rajya Sabha MP AA Rahim Moves Supreme Court Alleging Illegal Detention & Assault Of DYFI Members During Delhi CEC Protests
'What Does Religion Have To Do With Firecrackers?' Asks Justice Joymalya Bagchi
Delhi police de-notifies “Jantar Mantar” as designated protests site.
Lawyers read Preamble of Indian Constitution in the Delhi High Court.
Senior Advocates Rajshekhar Rao, Warisha Farasat, Anu Malhotra, Advocates Bharat Chugh, Shah Alam and various others present.
AA Rahim, MP from the Rajya Sabha and National President of the Democratic Youth Federation of India, has approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution, alleging brutal custodial torture and illegal detention of DYFI office bearers and activists during the protest yesterday.
"Beating is not a cognizable offense?" Adv Prashant Bhushan argues plea seeking CBI/SIT probe into alleged assault of lawyers when they went to protest against BCI Chairman #MananKumarMishra
J Bagchi: In the factual background, it is not inadequate or unrealistice if you proceed under provisions of BNSS before a Magistrate. Magistrate has power of investigation
If you say Magistrate will be empowered to empower an investigation ...we don't know who these lawyers were. Mr Mishra claims
CJI: There's power with Magistrate to find out who are the lawyers, even before taking cognizance
Bhushan: Court says your remedy is to go to Delhi police. We lodged complaint with police. It's been 2 months. Not even an FIR registered so far. In CBI, selection of CBI chief is not made by govt alone. Committee includes Chief Justice
J Bagchi: Isn't it better to go for a private complaint?
Bhushan: I don't have CCTV footage. All of Delhi police is employed in central Delhi
J Bagchi: Court will give you access. Your clients have a right to fair [...] and we are here to ensure that. Only question is of methodology.
New Form 6 Wasn't There When Bihar SIR Judgment Was Delivered, We Haven't Adjudicated On It : Supreme Court
#SupremeCourt says it did not adjudicate on new Form 6 in #BiharSIR case; Justice Bagchi says CJI did not say whether new Form 6 was approved or not
Fresh PIL filed before SC on Form 6 controversy, impleading CEC Gyanesh Kumar
Adv: On 5 October, already declared by this court, Form 6 is not approved by Court. But ECI said it was approved by Supreme Court. With regard to this, I am seeking
J Bagchi: There is no adjudication on the new Form 6. What the Hon'ble Chief Justice said was that when the Bihar SIR judgment was delivered, new Form 6 was not there. That does not say it is either approved or disapproved by the Supreme Court
CJI: Please don't pick words for news item.
“How can you enter house of this man?Denying permission (for protest) is within your right bur where is your cause to confine him?”: Delhi High Court asks Delhi Police on activist Nadeem Khan’s plea against his detention on September 29 ahead of Jantar Mantar protest.