Majority Of SCBA Executive Members Express Disagreement With SCBA President's Letter To CJI Against Farmers Protest

Update: 2024-02-13 16:35 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article

In a dramatic development, the majority of members of the Executive Committee of the Supreme Court Bar Association have disagreed with an earlier letter sent by SCBA President Senior Advocate Adish C Aggarwala to the Chief Justice of India seeking suo motu action against "erring farmers" in the context of the farmers protest.The 13 members of the Executive Committee of the SCBA, have in...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

In a dramatic development, the majority of members of the Executive Committee of the Supreme Court Bar Association have disagreed with an earlier letter sent by SCBA President Senior Advocate Adish C Aggarwala to the Chief Justice of India seeking suo motu action against "erring farmers" in the context of the farmers protest.

The 13 members of the Executive Committee of the SCBA, have in a resolution, clarified that the SCBA President  wrote the letter “unilaterally without any consultation with the members of the Executive Committee.”

Expressing that the controversial letter written on the letterhead of the SCBA gives a wrong impression that it reflects the opinion of the SCBA, the respective executive members have disagreed and dissociated with the contents of the said letter.

“This letter has been issued by the President unilaterally without any consultation with the members of the Executive Committee. The letter written on the Supreme Court Bar Association letterhead gives the incorrect impression that the letter is written on behalf of the Supreme Court Bar Association. We do not agree with the contents of the letter and disassociate ourselves with this letter.”

The resolution of the executive committee is signed and supported by the following persons :

  1. Mr Meenesh Kumar Dubey, Joint Secretary
  2. Mr Arjit Prasad
  3. Mr Jayant Bhushan
  4. Mr Ranji Thomas
  5. Mr Narendra Hooda
  6. Mr S Wasim Ahemed Qadri
  7. Mr Vibhu Shanker Mishra
  8. Mr. Shashank Shekhar
  9. Mr Pratap Venugopal
  10. Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli
  11. Mr. Manish Goswami
  12. Mr Anil C Nishani
  13. Mr Uprendra Mishra

 

 

The SCBA President, in his letter to the CJI, stated that "inspite of the best efforts of the Government of India to protect the interest of the farmers, some farmers are en route to Delhi from Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, and Punjab and are gearing up for a large-scale protest in the national capital on February 13."

"Even if the farmers have genuine demands, they don't have the right to put the general public to hardship. This is the right time when the Hon'ble Supreme Court should act suo motu and ensure that these farmers don't create any nuisance and cause huge inconvenience to the general public," he said.

Suspecting the the farmers' protest to be "politically motivated", SCBA President urged the CJI to take suo motu action against "the erring farmers for forcibly trying to enter Delhi in a bid to create nuisance and disturb the daily life of citizens."

Tags:    

Similar News