NEET-SS 2021- 'What Is The Hurry In Changing Pattern?Have Some Concern For Students', Supreme Court To NBE [LIVE UPDATES FROM HEARING]

Update: 2021-10-05 08:42 GMT

The Supreme Court is hearing a plea filed by 41 PG Qualified Doctors challenging abrupt "last minute changes" in the exam pattern of NEET SS 2021.A bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna is hearing the petition.Senior Advocate Shyam Divan is appearing for the petitioners. Yesterday, the National Board of Examination filed an affidavit stating that the...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Supreme Court is hearing a plea filed by 41 PG Qualified Doctors challenging abrupt "last minute changes" in the exam pattern of NEET SS 2021.

A bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud, Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna is hearing the petition.

Senior Advocate Shyam Divan is appearing for the petitioners. Yesterday, the National Board of Examination filed an affidavit stating that the pattern was revised to bring in more flexibility in the admission process and to ensure that the students are tested only on the basis of the courses which they know.

The NBE also proposed to defer the exams- originally scheduled on November 13/14 - by two months to January 10/11, 2022 to give more time to students to prepare as per the revised pattern.

Stay on this page for live-updates from the hearing.



Live Updates
2021-10-05 10:29 GMT
Hearing ends for today. The hearing will continue tomorrow morning.
2021-10-05 10:28 GMT

Sr Adv Maninder Singh for the NBE : If the court is under the impression that all this has been done to fill up vacant seats, I request the Govt to dispel the impression and to have this implemented from this year. The Board does not want to give the impression.

Justice Chandrachud : I read your counter affidavit yesterday and this comes in the forefront.

2021-10-05 10:25 GMT

Justice Chandrachud : We will still give you time to put your house in order. We will hear it tomorrow. But if you are showing obduracy, the arms of the law are strong.

2021-10-05 10:25 GMT

Justice Chandrachud : The impression we get is, the medical education has become a business, medical regulation has also become a business.

2021-10-05 10:24 GMT

Justice Chandrachud : Don't do like this. That you announce the changes in August for the exam in November. And when the students come to the court, you change the exams to January. This does not augur well for the medical education in the country.

2021-10-05 10:23 GMT

Justice Chandrachud : We don't have a vision. We don't have a plan for the future. Just because you have the authority, you do it? What was the hurry in doing this year? Would heavens have fallen if 500 seats remain vacant this year? Give students time to prepare. You do it next year, with adequate notice.

2021-10-05 10:22 GMT

Justice Chandrachud : For 12 super specialties, 100% questions are from general medicines. The entire examination is going to be only be on general medicine. The logic seems to be, general medicine is the largest pool, and tap them to fill the seats. That seems to be idea. And see the prejudice caused to the studies.Previously they got 40% questions from the feeder courses but now they would get 100% questions from General Medicine.


2021-10-05 10:19 GMT

Justice Chandrachud now explaining to ASG Bhati the impact of changes.

'Now, the entire 100% questions will be from general medicine", Justice Chandrachud says after explaining the chart.

2021-10-05 10:13 GMT

ASG Bhati : There is no prejudice cause to the students. On the contrary, there is a comparative ease, a comparative flexibility given to the students. Earlier, 60% questions were from the super specialty which they have to study.  I bow down that we could have given more time. That is why we have agreed to defer for two months. The price for not implementing this year will be very high.

2021-10-05 10:11 GMT

Justice Chandrachud :It appears that your clients only want to fill the vacant seats.

ASG Bhati : It is not just about the seats. There is a larger public interest behind our decision. If something is not working in larger interest then some amendments have to be made. Grouping and subjects remains the same as in 2020 exam.



Similar News