Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1236 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1414NOMINAL INDEXMEENAKSHI TYAGI v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1236ABID KHAN v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1237SELECT CITYWALK RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. VARDHMAN AMRANTE PRIVATE LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1238VIPIN AHUJA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1239AKHILESH AND...
Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1236 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1414
NOMINAL INDEX
MEENAKSHI TYAGI v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1236
ABID KHAN v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1237
SELECT CITYWALK RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. VARDHMAN AMRANTE PRIVATE LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1238
VIPIN AHUJA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1239
AKHILESH AND ORS v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1240
AKBAR ALI & ANR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1241
RAVI SHANKAR v. JOHN DOE(S) / ASHOK KUMAR(S) & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1242
X v. Y & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1243
JSW Ispat Special Products Limited v Bharat Petroresources Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1244
AAI v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1245
Transformative Learning Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax Delhi East & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1246
NAVEEN YADAV v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1247
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Brinton Pharmaceuticals Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1248
Ms. Puja Jayant & Ors. v. Commissioner Of Customs, IGI Airport 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1249
Quentin Decon v. Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1250
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Biodiscovery Lifesciences Private Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1251
LALIT @ LUCKY v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1296
Popular Front of India v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1297
PRAVEEN SINGH v. HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1298
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI V/s MOHD. TAHIR HUSSAIN & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1299
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 v CASIO INDIA COMPANY PVT. LTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1300
X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1301
Delhi Ki Galiyan NGO v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors. LiveLaw (Del) 1302
Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v. Alchem International Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1303
MANGAL SINGH v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1304
DELHI TRANSCO LIMITED versus M/S HINDUSTAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1305
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V v. M. BATHLA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1306
NASEEM AHMED v. DEEPAK SINGH 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1307
Himanshu Yadav & Anr. v. AIIMS & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1308
HRITHIK ROSHAN v. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1309
KUMAR SANU BHATTACHARJEE v. JAMMABLE LIMITED & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1310
Karti P Chidambaram v. CBI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1311
Sohn Singh v. Dildar Singh 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1312
KHAJA HUSSAIN v. DIRECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1313
UNION OF INDIA & ORS v. SATYVIR SINGH & ORS & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1314
JUGLAL RAM CHANDER v. SURINDER PAL JAIN 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1315
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATION RESEARCH & TRAINING versus M/S MURLI INDUSTRIES LTD. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1316
M/S TEFCIL BREWERIES LTD. versus M/S ALFA LAVAL INDIA PVT. LTD. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1317
Amit Kumar v. Union of India & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1318
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS v. SAMEER DNYANDEV WANKHEDE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1319
ED v. M/S. HI-TECH MERCANTILE INDIA PVT LTD & ORS. & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1320
USHA DRAGER PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. DRAEGERWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1321
KHUSHWANT KAUR v. SMT GAGANDEEP SIDHU & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1322
Union Bank of India v. M/S Shabd Enterprises And Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1323
SAVAN GODIAWALA V. INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1324
MS FARHEEN ISRAIL & ANR v. GHULAM RASOOL WANI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1325
KANTA PRASAD v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1326
Earthz Urban Spaces Pvt. Ltd. v. Ravinder Munshi & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1327
RAHUL @ BHUPINDER VERMA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1328
X v. STATE OF NCT & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1329
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA. versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1330
M/S H P SPINNING MILLS PVT. LTD. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1331
MAHESH SHRIVASTVA @ JEEVA v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1332
WOW MOMO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WOW BURGER & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1333
NATIONAL HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (NHIDCL) versus NSPR VKJ JV & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1334
GAURAV AGGARWAL versus RICHA GUPTA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1335
MARS INCORPORATED v. CADBURY (INDIA) LTD & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1336
MANORAMA SAKKERWAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1337
VARUN ARYA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1338
DEEPAK NANDA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1339
Mudit Gupta v. AAI & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1340
SUMIT SINGH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1341
SHAHID NASIR v. NIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1342
ABUZAR @ ANTA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1343
NAVEEN KUMAR v. BABITA JAIN 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1344
MRS. ANSHIKA KUMARI v. BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1345
MAHINDRA HZPC PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS v. SHRI RAM FARMS & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1346
X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1347
Shubham Agarwal v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1348
Bed Ram v. UoI & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1349
Rajia @ Sabbo v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1350
Sunair Hotels Ltd. v. State & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1351
PC Jhalani & Ors v. Jhalani Tools (India) Ltd & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1352
Writer Business Services Pvt. Ltd v. UIDAI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1353
The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. John Doe & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1354
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Remfry And Sagar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1355
Save India Foundation v. GNCTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1356
M/S B S Enviro N Infracon Private Limited v. Vij Contracts Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1357
Sh. Samarendra Das v. M/S Win Medicare Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1358
Union of India Through Secretary & Ors. vs. S K Jasra 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1359
The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. Vivanta Stays 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1360
Arjun Patil v. UOI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1361
Future Consumer Limited v. UOI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1362
M/S Moms Cradle Private Limited v. UOI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1363
Alkali Manufacturers Association of India v. UOI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1364
M/S Balaji Enterprises v. The Principal Commissioner, DGGI, Meerut Zonal Unit & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1365
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. HARESH SINGH, ADVOCATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1366
THOPPANI SANJEEV RAO v. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1367
Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone) Zone 12 Delhi & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1368
BHUPENDER SINGH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1369
Nitco Logistics Pvt Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Customs Airport And General 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1370
STANLEY CHIMEIZI ALASONYE @UKA CHUKWU v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1371
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED versus BRITISH MARINE PLC 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1372
Punita Khatter v. Explorers Travel & Tour Pvt Ltd 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1374
SRI SAI SAPTHAGIRI SPONGE PVT. LTD v. THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1375
JAI MANGAL MEHTO v. STATE (GOVT. N.C.T. OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1376
ABDUL HAMEED REHMANI v. SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1377
GURBACHAN SINGH MATTA v. CENTRAL BAUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1378
UDAI PAL v. STATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1379
RENU ARORA AND OTHERS v. ST. MARGARET SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ANR & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1380
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1 v. M/S Agroha Fincap Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1381
VIVEK DEEP v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1382
P S JAYAKUMAR & ANR v. STATE (NCT of Delhi) & ANR and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1383
Mr. Gurdev Raj Kumar v. Collector Of Stamps (Government Of Nct Of Delhi) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1384
HARBANS SINGH v. ANAND TYAGI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1385
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SH ABHISHEK VERMA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1386
VIRENDER SINGH BIDHURI v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1387
Prof. Madhu Kishwar v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1388
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS v. AMIT KUMAR & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1389
ANI Media Pvt Ltd v. Dynamite News Network Private Limited & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1390
Nora Beniwal v. Union of India & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1391
Mrs Shumita Sandhu v. Mrs Tani Sandhu Bhargava 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1392
Mecwel Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. GE Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1393
Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences (IHBAS) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1394
RUSHANT MALHOTRA & ORS v. THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1395
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. NITIN BANSAL 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1396
X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1397
Devyani Kundra v. State Of NCT Of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1398
Mr Krishan Lal Gulati & Anr. v. State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1399
Jamia Teachers Association v. Jamia Millia Islamia 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1400
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI v. TAUHID KHAN @ SHAHID @ LAMBA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1401
Subhash Pahwa @ Subhash Chander v. State NCT of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1402
Archana Chaudhary v. Harsh Dawar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1403
Chetna Gautam v. The Union of India & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1404
X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1405
Union of India v. Smt. Guddi Bisht W/O Late Hav Puran Chandra Singh Bisht 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1406
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR v. SAHIL LOHCHAB & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1407
ARVIND BHATNAGAR v. STATE & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1408
Patil Shivaji Madhukar v. UoI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1409
Prabhat Singh Charak v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1410
MAHARASHTRA CARROM ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1411
M/s Connoisseur Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. through Mr. Anil Sharma (Ex-Director) v. Official Liquidator of M/s Connoisseur Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1412
Union of India v. Ajay Kumar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1413
Air India Limited v. Airport Employees Union (Regd.) & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1414
Title: MEENAKSHI TYAGI v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1236
The Delhi High Court has deprecated the practice of filing petitions without jurisdiction, adding that it may be necessary to impose costs, even at the stage of withdrawal of the matters.
Title: ABID KHAN v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1237
The Delhi High Court has rejected a plea filed by a candidate seeking to recalculate his OMR evaluation and to revise his result and rank in relation to the National Eligibility Entrance Test (UG) 2025.
Title: SELECT CITYWALK RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. VARDHMAN AMRANTE PRIVATE LIMITED
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1238
The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to Select Citywalk Retail Private Limited and restrained a real estate developer from using “Vardhman Citywalk” mark.
Title: VIPIN AHUJA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1239
The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR against a man accused of assaulting a doctor on duty, asking him to do one month community service at the same hospital.
Title: AKHILESH AND ORS v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1240
The Delhi High Court has said that quashing a case of child marriage and sexual offences over settlement between the parties would grant “judicial imprimatur” to the unlawful conduct which the Parliament seeks to deter.
Title: AKBAR ALI & ANR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1241
The Delhi High Court has quashed a sexual harassment case following settlement and an undertaking by the two accused to do two months of community service at city's Jama Masjid.
Title: RAVI SHANKAR v. JOHN DOE(S) / ASHOK KUMAR(S) & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1242
The Delhi High Court has passed a john doe order protecting the personality rights of “The Art of Living” foundation founder, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar.
Title: X v. Y & other connected matters
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1243
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a husband cannot claim exclusive ownership of a property jointly held by both the spouses, merely on the ground that he alone paid the EMIs.
Case Title – JSW Ispat Special Products Limited v Bharat Petroresources Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1244
The Delhi High Court Bench of Justice Jyoti Singh has observed that claims which are not a part of the Resolution Plan on the date of approval, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to arbitrate such claims. Put differently, post-insolvency commencement date claims which are not made a part of the Resolution Plan are not arbitrable.
Case title: AAI v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1245
The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere with an order of the GST authority rejecting CENVAT Credit to the tune of Rs.9.34 crores claimed by the Airport Authority of India.
Case title: Transformative Learning Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax Delhi East & Anr
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1246
The Delhi High Court has held that a Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate (FIRC) need not correspond to each individual transaction and it may reflect a period as a whole, provided that the overall benefit being claimed is fully substantiated by the total foreign exchange remittance.
Title: NAVEEN YADAV v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1247
The Delhi High Court has observed that calling off a marriage after the courtship period, after reasoned choice, cannot be termed as breach of promise to marry.
Case title: Mankind Pharma Limited v. Brinton Pharmaceuticals Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1248
The Delhi High Court has restrained Maharashtra-based Brinton Pharmaceuticals from using the mark ACNESCAR, or any other mark which is confusing or deceptively similar to Mankind Pharma's ACNESTAR.
Case title: Ms. Puja Jayant & Ors. v. Commissioner Of Customs, IGI Airport
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1249
The Delhi High Court has asked the Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi Police to conduct an enquiry into alleged forgery of Customs stamps at the Delhi International Airport.
Case title: Quentin Decon v. Customs
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1250
The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a foreign national, incarcerated for over 4 years in connection with a drug trafficking case.
In doing so, Justice Arun Monga noted that the Investigating Officer had himself admitted during cross-examination that the seized substance had been mixed before sampling, making it impossible to identify which packet the samples sent for testing came from or their individual weights.
Case title: Mankind Pharma Limited v. Biodiscovery Lifesciences Private Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1251
The Delhi High Court has granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of Mankind Pharma, in relation to its 'Kind' family of marks.
Title: LALIT @ LUCKY v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1296
The Delhi High Court has slammed the State authorities for defying the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, observing that they do not have any sensitivity towards the prisoners who are suffering long incarceration.
Case Title: Popular Front of India v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1297
The Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Central government on Popular Front of India's (PFI) plea challenging an order of an Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) tribunal confirming the five-year ban imposed on it.
In doing so the court said that PFI's plea challenging order confirming ban is maintainable before the high court.
Title: PRAVEEN SINGH v. HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1298
The Delhi High Court has directed the authorities to take appropriate decision for providing relaxation of 5 years age and qualifying marks to the extent of 5% to transgender persons in public employment concerning recruitment to various posts in the Court establishment.
Case title: STATE OF NCT OF DELHI V/s MOHD. TAHIR HUSSAIN & ORS.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1299
The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea moved by the Delhi Police against a trial court order rejecting its application seeking recall of a prosecution witness in the trial pertaining to an arson case in connection with 2020 North-East Delhi Riots, wherein one of accused is former AAP leader Tahir Hussain.
Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue's Demand Against Casio India In Transfer Pricing Case
Case Name: PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 v CASIO INDIA COMPANY PVT. LTD
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1300
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a transfer pricing demand against Casio India, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Japanese watchmaker, related to advertising, marketing and promotion expenses for the assessment year 2017-18
Title: X v. Y
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1301
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a marriage between two individuals cannot be declared as invalid on the ground that it was never solemnized as per Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Case title: Delhi Ki Galiyan NGO v. Deputy Commissioner & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1302
The Delhi High Court has come down heavily on a man for unauthorisedly filing a writ petition on behalf of a NGO, against an alleged illegal construction in the city's Jamia Nagar area.
Case title: Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v. Alchem International Pvt. Ltd.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1303
The Delhi High Court has restrained Alchem International Pvt. Ltd., incorporated in the year 1982, from infringing the trademark of Alkem Laboratories Ltd., a company engaged in manufacture and sale of pharmaceutical and nutraceutical products.
Title: MANGAL SINGH v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1304
The Delhi High Court has observed that there is no bar on producing the call data records (CDRs) of raiding team and police informers in NDPS Act cases provided their safety and privacy is protected.
Case Title: DELHI TRANSCO LIMITED versus M/S HINDUSTAN URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1305
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) filed by Delhi Transco Limited (DTL) upholding an arbitral award in favour of M/s Hindustan Urban Infrastructure Limited. The Court further held that once an issue of limitation has already been decided by the High Court and the delay in filing the petition under section 34 of the Arbitration Act was condoned, the same issue cannot be revisited by the District Court.
Title: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V v. M. BATHLA & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1306
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a suit filed by Koninklijke Philips N.V., simply branded Philips, against a company manufacturing and selling VCDs alleging that the same violated its “Digital Transmission System” patent.
Title: NASEEM AHMED v. DEEPAK SINGH
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1307
The Delhi High Court has observed that a tenant cannot deny the title of a landlord during the tenancy, even where allegations of forgery are raised.
Case title: Himanshu Yadav & Anr. v. AIIMS & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1308
The Delhi High Court has held that caste certificates issued before or after the timeframe stipulated in a recruitment advertisement are not relevant for the purpose of granting reservation to a candidate.
Title: HRITHIK ROSHAN v. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1309
The Delhi High Court directed the removal of certain links and listings on various internet and e-commerce websites, which allegedly infringed the personality rights of Actor Hrithik Roshan.
Will Protect Personality Rights Of Singer Kumar Sanu: Delhi High Court
Title: KUMAR SANU BHATTACHARJEE v. JAMMABLE LIMITED & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1310
The Delhi High Court has passed an interim injunction order in a plea by Indian playback singer Kumar Sanu Bhattacharjee, seeking protection of his personality rights.
Title: Karti P Chidambaram v. CBI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1311
The Delhi High Court has relaxed the bail condition imposed on Karti Chidambaram in relation to the INX media corruption case, requiring him to obtain trial court's permission for foreign travel.
Case title: Sohn Singh v. Dildar Singh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1312
“It is high time that paradigm be changed by courts and an impression across the society be dispelled that civil suits can be allowed to run for decades,” the Delhi High Court said.
Title: KHAJA HUSSAIN v. DIRECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1313
The Delhi High Court has observed that the act of a married officer of a uniformed service sending vulgar messages to another woman is unacceptable.
Title: UNION OF INDIA & ORS v. SATYVIR SINGH & ORS & other connected matter
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1314
The Delhi High Court has observed that the benefits under the MACP (Modified Assured Career Progression) schemes is not meant for the Central Government employees who have already received a higher grade pay.
Title: JUGLAL RAM CHANDER v. SURINDER PAL JAIN
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1315
The Delhi High Court has observed that a tenant cannot be allowed to shift stands from one forum to another by raising new or contrary pleas in eviction proceedings.
Case Title: NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATION RESEARCH & TRAINING versus M/S MURLI INDUSTRIES LTD.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1316
The Delhi High Court partly set aside an arbitral award which directed the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) to refund of Rs. 2 crore to M/s Murli Industries Ltd. holding that the finding of the arbitrator that breakdown of a machinery constituted a force majeure event cannot be sustained. The court however upheld the arbitrator's finding that the time was not the essence of the contract and therefore the NCERT was not justified to forfeit the performance security unless actual loss was established.
Case Title: M/S TEFCIL BREWERIES LTD. versus M/S ALFA LAVAL INDIA PVT. LTD.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1317
The Delhi High Court held that mere correction of typographical error does not extend the period limitation for filing a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act). The court further held that the limitation period begins from the date of disposal of an application under section 33 of the Arbitration Act and not from the date when a signed corrected copy of the award is received by the party.
Case title: Amit Kumar v. Union of India & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1318
Stating that no role is trivial in security forces, the Delhi High Court has upheld the dismissal of a Water Carrier from CRPF over submission of a fake matriculation certificate.
Title: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS v. SAMEER DNYANDEV WANKHEDE
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1319
The Delhi High Court has fined the Central Government for concealing facts in its plea seeking review of the ruling concerning grant of promotion to IRS officer Sameer Wankhede.
Title: ED v. M/S. HI-TECH MERCANTILE INDIA PVT LTD & ORS. & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1320
The Delhi High Court has held that coal block allocation obtained through misrepresentation or fraud leading to proceeds of crime amounts to an offence of money laundering under the PMLA.
Title: USHA DRAGER PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. DRAEGERWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1321
The Delhi High Court has observed that merely because a party alleges that the other side deliberately enhanced the valuation of the suit to ensure that the mattwrs comes out of jurisdiction of the concerned court is not sufficient ground to allege bias and seek transfer.
Title: KHUSHWANT KAUR v. SMT GAGANDEEP SIDHU & other connected matter
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1322
The Delhi High Court has observed that the wife residing in the house immediately after her marriage constitutes “shared household” under the Domestic Violence Act and is entitled to reside in the same despite the husband being disowned by his parents later.
Case title: Union Bank of India v. M/S Shabd Enterprises And Anr
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1323
The Delhi High Court has expressed dismay at the Union Bank of India over its “lethargic” approach in pursuing a loan recovery suit, leading to multiple adjournments and dismissal in default.
Case Title : SAVAN GODIAWALA V. INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1324
The Delhi High Court slammed the conduct of a senior insolvency professional, warning that such individuals must not become “predators” of companies already in financial distress.
Title: MS FARHEEN ISRAIL & ANR v. GHULAM RASOOL WANI & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1325
The Delhi High Court has observed that a landlord is the best judge of his needs, and cannot be thrusted with the opinion of the tenant or the Court.
Title: KANTA PRASAD v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1326
The Delhi High Court has passed a slew of directions to ensure that convicts' applications for parole and furlough are decided in a fair and reasoned manner, avoiding the “recurring” pattern of their rejection without proper reasoning.
Case title: Earthz Urban Spaces Pvt. Ltd. v. Ravinder Munshi & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1327
The Delhi High Court has held that courts can exempt a property from the doctrine of lis pendens, to shield genuine owners from vexatious suits.
The doctrine stems from Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882. It stipulates that any transfer of property during a pending lawsuit affecting that property is subject to the outcome of the lawsuit.
Title: RAHUL @ BHUPINDER VERMA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1328
While acquitting a man in a POCSO case, the Delhi High Court has ruled that mere use of the term “physical relations” without supporting evidence is insufficient to establish rape or aggravated penetrative sexual assault.
Title: X v. STATE OF NCT & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1329
The Delhi High Court has ruled that an order passed by a Magistrate issuing process or summoning an accused, despite a cancellation report filed by the police, can be challenged in revisional jurisdiction before the sessions court or the High Court.
Case Title: NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA. versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1330
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) filed by National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) against an arbitral award passed in favor of Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. (HCC). The court further held that the arbitrator's award of compensation for expenses incurred during extended time period was reasoned, plausible and did not suffer from perversity or patent illegality.
Case Title: M/S H P SPINNING MILLS PVT. LTD. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1331
The Delhi High Court restored an arbitral award in favor of M/s H.P. Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd.(Appellant) which was set aside 16 years ago holding that clause of the insurance policy which required claims to be made within 12 months from the date of loss was void and unforceable under section 28 of the Indian Contract Act. The court held that the Single Judge erred in relying on section 28 pre-amendment precedents which allowed limitation clauses that extinguished rights.
Externment Order Can't Curtail Liberty Or Livelihood On Unsubstantiated Grounds: Delhi High Court
Title: MAHESH SHRIVASTVA @ JEEVA v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1332
The Delhi High Court has observed that an externment order cannot be used to deprive an individual of his or her liberty and right to livelihood, on the grounds which are totally unsubstantiated.
Title: WOW MOMO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WOW BURGER & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1333
The Delhi High Court has granted interim injunction in favour of “WOW MOMO”, an Indian quick-service restaurant chain, in its trademark infringement suit filed against a Hong Kong-based company “WOW BURGER.”
Case Title: NATIONAL HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (NHIDCL) versus NSPR VKJ JV & ORS.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1334
The Delhi High Court held that mere allegations of corruption or pendency of an unverified complaint against an arbitrator cannot justify termination of arbitrator's mandate under section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act).
Case Title: GAURAV AGGARWAL versus RICHA GUPTA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1335
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award terminating proceedings under section 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) on the ground that an agreement to sell (ATS) between the parties was unforceable for being unregistered and unstamped under Uttar Pradesh law.
Title: MARS INCORPORATED v. CADBURY (INDIA) LTD & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1336
The Delhi High Court has ended the 25 year long battle between Mars and Cadbury over infringement of “Celebrations” trademark, followed by mutual settlement between the two confectionery companies.
Title: MANORAMA SAKKERWAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1337
The Delhi High Court has imposed a costs of Rs. 1 lakh on a woman for misusing the judicial process and suppression of material facts in her petition alleging unauthorized construction at a property located in city's Karol Bagh area.
Title: VARUN ARYA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1338
The Delhi High Court has refused to order special investigation or inquiry into the death of IFS Mukul Arya, India's representative to Palestine, who was found dead in his residence in Ramallah on March 06, 2022.
Title: DEEPAK NANDA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1339
The Delhi High Court has observed that the administrative delay by the authorities in deciding the parole application cannot be allowed to prejudice the rights of the convict.
Case title: Mudit Gupta v. AAI & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1340
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a blind candidate can't be ousted from recruitment for a job post if he is able to perceive and discharge required duties.
Title: SUMIT SINGH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1341
The Delhi High Court has observed that friendship is not a license to an accused to rape the victim repeatedly and beat her mercilessly.
Title: SHAHID NASIR v. NIA & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1342
The Delhi High Court has observed that the right to life under Article 21 of Constitution of India includes observing an individual's religious duties and personal obligations.
Title: ABUZAR @ ANTA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1343
The Delhi High Court has observed that a judicial officer cannot be forced to pronounce a verdict without adequate clarity or assistance on the issue, whenever required.
Title: NAVEEN KUMAR v. BABITA JAIN
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1344
The Delhi High Court has observed that a landlord being the “housewife landlady” can require the tenanted premises from the tenant for husband's welfare and family duties, which would qualified as “bona fide requirement.”
Title: MRS. ANSHIKA KUMARI v. BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND OTHERS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1345
The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to take steps to reconstitute the Committee of the Advocates' Welfare Fund Trust expeditiously.
Title: MAHINDRA HZPC PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS v. SHRI RAM FARMS & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1346
The Delhi High Court has barred a woman lawyer from appearing before it through video conferencing, noting that she switched off her camera and muted herself citing parallel ongoing hearing which is against the VC Rules.
Case title: X v. Y
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1347
The Delhi High Court has held that questioning husband's legitimacy by calling him bastard and making reprehensible allegations against his mother constitute matrimonial cruelty, a ground for divorce.
Case title: Shubham Agarwal v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1348
The Delhi High Court has paved the way for a third medical examination of a UPSC aspirant, claiming to have more than 40% hearing disability, after a material difference emerged in the reports prepared by AIIMS and Army Hospital.
Case title: Bed Ram v. UoI & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1349
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation for land acquisition payable with respect to flood-prone Kilokari, Nangli Razapur, Khizrabad and Garhi Mendu areas of the national capital.
Case title: Rajia @ Sabbo v. State
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1350
The Delhi High Court has suspended the life sentence of a woman, convicted for murder of her alleged paramour, citing concerns about the well being of her three children.
Case title: Sunair Hotels Ltd. v. State & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1351
The Delhi High Court has held that a private individual who is falsely accused in a police complaint can himself initiate proceedings against the accused under Section 211 IPC, without having to get the action initiated by the court.
Case title: PC Jhalani & Ors v. Jhalani Tools (India) Ltd & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1352
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that once a final winding up order has been passed against a Company and the Official Liquidator has taken charge, the Company Court is not required to come to the aid of guarantors so as to shield them from recovery proceedings initiated by creditors.
Case title: Writer Business Services Pvt. Ltd v. UIDAI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1353
The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere with UIDAI's decision to reject the lowest financial bid submitted by Writer Business Services Pvt. Ltd for audit and quality check of Aadhar applications.
Case title: The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. John Doe & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1354
The Delhi High Court ordered take down of an alleged AI generated deepfake video, alleging poisoning of guests by employees of the renowned hotel Taj Lake Palace in Udaipur.
Case title: Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Remfry And Sagar
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1355
The Delhi High Court has upheld an order of the ITAT allowing IPR law firm Remfry & Sagar to treat the license fees paid by it to acquire its founder's goodwill, as a business expense deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.
Case title: Save India Foundation v. GNCTD
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1356
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to make Delhi's CCTV footage public.The plea filed by Save India Foundation sought directions to the Delhi Police to upload and share the CCTV feed from the cameras installed by the Delhi Government on a public domain, in a time bound manner.
Case title: M/S B S Enviro N Infracon Private Limited v. Vij Contracts Pvt. Ltd.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1357
The Delhi High Court has held that it is inequitable of a creditor to demand balance payment after accepting a lesser sum towards satisfaction of a claim.
Case title: Sh. Samarendra Das v. M/S Win Medicare Pvt. Ltd.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1358
The Delhi High Court has held that a medical sales representative, who has received specialized training for his field of work, cannot be categorised as a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Case Name : Union of India Through Secretary & Ors. vs. S K Jasra
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1359
A Division bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Madhu Jain held that a chargesheet issued without the prior approval of the competent disciplinary authority under Rule 14(3) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 is void ab initio, non-existent in law. Further it cannot be validated by subsequent ratification.
Case title: The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. Vivanta Stays
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1360
The Delhi High Court has restrained an entity from infringing the trademark of Tata Group's Indian Hotels Company Limited which runs and operates hotel brand 'Vivanta'.
Case title: Arjun Patil v. UOI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1361
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that Indian currency can be seized by the Enforcement Directorate under provisions of the erstwhile Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, if the same is intended to be used for illegal purchase of foreign exchange.
Case title: Future Consumer Limited v. UOI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1362
The Delhi High Court has held that an unsigned GST demand order is valid, if the same is accompanied by DRC-07 which contains the details of the official who passed the order.
Case title: M/S Moms Cradle Private Limited v. UOI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1363
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a taxpayer cannot ignore an order passed against it and uploaded on the GST portal, merely because copy of the order was allegedly illegible.
Delhi High Court Directs Customs To Ensure Strict Implementation Of Minimum Import Price On Soda Ash
Case title: Alkali Manufacturers Association of India v. UOI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1364
The Delhi High Court has directed the Customs authorities to ensure strict implementation of the Minimum Import Price (MIP) imposed by DGFT on Soda Ash, warning of stringent action in case of any violations.
Case title: M/S Balaji Enterprises v. The Principal Commissioner, DGGI, Meerut Zonal Unit & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1365
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that an assessee is entitled to copies of the data stored on its electronic devices which are seized by the GST Department, unless the same is prejudicial to the probe.
Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. HARESH SINGH, ADVOCATE
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1366
The Delhi High Court has discharged a lawyer in a criminal contempt case for misbehaving with a woman judge and intimidating her by using derogatory and threatening language.
Title: THOPPANI SANJEEV RAO v. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1367
The Delhi High Court has said that Police officials must treat women with dignity and avoid using inappropriate language with them.
Case title: Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone) Zone 12 Delhi & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1368
The Delhi High Court has held that Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act, 1932 is not an embargo to suits filed by unregistered firms, if any statutory or common law right is being sought to be enforced.
Title: BHUPENDER SINGH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1369
The Delhi High Court has observed that the practice of sex determination undermines value of female life and strikes at the hope of a discrimination free society.
Case title: Nitco Logistics Pvt Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Customs Airport And General
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1370
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a Customs Housing Agent is responsible for the actions of its employees and it must exercise due diligence in supervising their activities.
Title: STANLEY CHIMEIZI ALASONYE @UKA CHUKWU v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & other connected matter
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1371
The Delhi High Court ruled that the version of the police cannot be disbelieved merely because the search and seizure of narcotics under the NDPS Act is not videographed or photographed.
Case Title: STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED versus BRITISH MARINE PLC
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1372
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) against an arbitral award passed in favor of British Marine PLC.(Respondent).
Case title: Punita Khatter v. Explorers Travel & Tour Pvt Ltd
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1374
The Delhi High Court has held that an employee is strictly liable under Section 452 of the Companies Act 2013 to return company property, at the end of his/ her employment.
Title: SRI SAI SAPTHAGIRI SPONGE PVT. LTD v. THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1375
The Delhi High Court has observed that the cheques issued only for security purpose and not for depositing to the bank are not encashable for any existing debt or liability.
Title: JAI MANGAL MEHTO v. STATE (GOVT. N.C.T. OF DELHI)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1376
The Delhi High Court has observed that change of the clothes of a minor rape victim under the POCSO Act before her medical examination cannot weaken the prosecution evidence.
Title: ABDUL HAMEED REHMANI v. SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1377
The Delhi High Court has observed that legal heirs have right to seek Impleadment after the appellant's death in pending appeals under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.
Title: GURBACHAN SINGH MATTA v. CENTRAL BAUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & other connected matter
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1378
The Delhi High Court has held that criminal prosecution cannot continue when the departmental proceedings as well as the Vigilance inquiry have found no merit in the allegations against an individual.
Title: UDAI PAL v. STATE
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1379
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the prosecution must prove that the minor rape victim was below the age of 16 years, for securing conviction of the accused in cases commencing prior to Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.
Title: RENU ARORA AND OTHERS v. ST. MARGARET SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ANR & other connected matters
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1380
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Committees appointed by the Court on zonal and central level to decide on fee hike and payment of teachers of unaided private schools in the national capital cannot perform judicial functions.
Case title: Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1 v. M/S Agroha Fincap Ltd.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1381
The Delhi High Court has held that the Income Tax Commissioner's order granting sanction under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for reopening assessment after four years of the relevant Assessment Year (AY) can be in the words— “Yes, I am convinced”.
Title: VIVEK DEEP v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1382
The Delhi High Court has observed that an accused can be denied anticipatory bail if he has been posting complainant's photographs on social media using inappropriate language as well as making posts against the judge or investigating agency.
Title: P S JAYAKUMAR & ANR v. STATE (NCT of Delhi) & ANR and other connected matters
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1383
The Delhi High Court has held that banks cannot be summoned as an accused for defamation as they lack the state of mind or mens rea necessary to constitute the offence.
Case title: Mr. Gurdev Raj Kumar v. Collector Of Stamps (Government Of Nct Of Delhi)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1384
The Delhi High Court has held that GST cannot be levied on renting/ leasing of residential premises for use as residence.
Title: HARBANS SINGH v. ANAND TYAGI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1385
The Delhi High Court has observed that mere omission by a landlord to disclose other properties owned by him will not disentitle him from obtaining eviction of a tenant for bonafide use of the tenanted premises.
Title: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SH ABHISHEK VERMA & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1386
The Delhi High Court has allowed recording of evidence of a US based prosecution witness via video conferencing in an Official Secrets Act case concerning businessman Abhishek Verma.
Title: VIRENDER SINGH BIDHURI v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1387
The Delhi High Court has observed that assaulting a woman and using caste based remarks against her on a flyover falls within the meaning of “public view” to satisfy the offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Case title: Prof. Madhu Kishwar v. State
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1388
The Delhi High Court has quashed an attempt to murder case lodged against commentator Prof. Madhu Kishwar back in 2008, over an alleged altercation with the Basoya family while she was clicking pictures of alleged unauthorised constructions in the city for her organization, Manushi.
Title: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS v. AMIT KUMAR & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1389
The Delhi High Court has ruled that rejecting a physically disabled individual's candidature citing no vacancy for such individuals defeats the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
Title: ANI Media Pvt Ltd v. Dynamite News Network Private Limited & Anr
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1390
The Delhi High Court rejected an appeal filed by news agency Asian News International (ANI), challenging a single judge order passed in its copyright infringement suit against news platform Dynamite News.
Title: Nora Beniwal v. Union of India & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1391
The Delhi High Court asked the authorities to take steps to provide better digital access to the students in higher education in various disciples and to also minimise the “digital divide.”
Case title: Mrs Shumita Sandhu v. Mrs Tani Sandhu Bhargava
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1392
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that mere failure of a party, alleging that a document is fraud, to provide particulars of such fraud doesn't lead to a conclusion that the party has admitted the genuineness of such document.
Case Title: Mecwel Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. GE Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1393
The Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under section 25 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) on account of non-filing of statement of claim does not amount to an arbitral award and therefore cannot be challenged under section 34.
Case Title: Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences (IHBAS)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1394
The Delhi High Court held that an award passed after expiry of the arbitrator's mandate is non-est and unforceable holding that the court has no power to extend the mandate post award if no application seeking extension of the mandate was pending before the award was passed.
Title: RUSHANT MALHOTRA & ORS v. THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1395
The Delhi High Court ordered retrospective payment of enhanced remuneration of Rs. 80,000 per month to its law researchers with effect from October 01, 2022.
Delhi High Court Sentences Man To One Month Jail For Threatening Local Commissioner With Gun
Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. NITIN BANSAL
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1396
The Delhi High Court sentenced a man to one month of simple imprisonment, along with Rs. 2,000 fine for threatening a Court appointment Local Commissioner with a pistol during execution of the commission.
Title: X v. Y
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1397
The Delhi High Court set out the key principles to be followed while determining maintenance to the wife and child, while also calling for reasoned orders by Family and Mahila Courts in the national capital.
Case title: Devyani Kundra v. State Of NCT Of Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1398
The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a young law graduate booked for the murder of her mother, citing the welfare of her minor child.
Case title: Mr Krishan Lal Gulati & Anr. v. State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1399
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a party cannot be sued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonor of cheques issued by it, if presented by a dissolved company.
Case title: Jamia Teachers Association v. Jamia Millia Islamia
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1400
The Delhi High Court has quashed two office orders and an advisory issued by Jamia Millia Islamia, dissolving the Jamia Teachers Association (JTA), an autonomous body of varsity teachers constituted in the year 1967 and administered through an Executive Committee elected by its members.
Title: STATE OF NCT OF DELHI v. TAUHID KHAN @ SHAHID @ LAMBA & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1401
The Delhi High Court has ruled that recovery of a contraband cannot be attributed to an accused under the NDPS Act without any proof of possession or independent witnesses.
Case title: Subhash Pahwa @ Subhash Chander v. State NCT of Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1402
The Delhi High Court has held that a plea of guilt made by an accused does not efface the rule against double jeopardy and a Court cannot conduct second prosecution for the same offence, based on such a plea.
Case title: Archana Chaudhary v. Harsh Dawar
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1403
The Delhi High Court has held that the provision to recall any person as a witness under Section 311 CrPC is meant to ensure justice, and is not a tool to delay proceedings in a criminal trial.
Title: Chetna Gautam v. The Union of India & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1404
The Delhi High Court refused to entertain two petitions filed challenging the certification given to “The Taj Story” film which is slated to be released on October 31.
Title: X v. Y
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1405
The Delhi High Court has observed that when the residential rights of a daughter in law have been protected under the Domestic Violence Act, the right of senior citizens, being the in-laws, to live in their house without distress cannot be suspended indefinitely.
Case title: Union of India v. Smt. Guddi Bisht W/O Late Hav Puran Chandra Singh Bisht
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1406
The Delhi High Court has upheld an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, directing the Central government to pay arrears of special family pension to the widow of an army personnel, who died back in 1978.
Title: DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR v. SAHIL LOHCHAB & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1407
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the waitlist panel cannot operate in a segregated manner, especially when the selection process of recruitment involves provisional result.
Title: ARVIND BHATNAGAR v. STATE & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1408
The Delhi High Court has observed that a matrimonial FIR cannot be quashed if the settlement agreement between the estranged couple is not executed.
Case title: Patil Shivaji Madhukar v. UoI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1409
The Delhi High Court has upheld the dismissal of a Border Security Force Sub-Inspector for developing illicit relations with a colleague's wife.
Case title: Prabhat Singh Charak v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1410
A CRPF personnel serving the nation deserved better treatment, remarked the Delhi High Court while lamenting the 20 years long battle fought by a sub-inspector to get clearance in disciplinary proceedings.
Title: MAHARASHTRA CARROM ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR & other connected matters
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1411
The Delhi High Court has restrained the All India Carrom Federation (AICF) from using the expression “India” or “Indian” in its name or logo or in the further competitions conducted by it.
Case Name: M/s Connoisseur Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. through Mr. Anil Sharma (Ex-Director) v. Official Liquidator of M/s Connoisseur Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1412
A division bench of the Delhi High Court, comprising Justice Anil Kshetrapal and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, has upheld the liability of a company to reimburse the official liquidator's security expenses for safeguarding corporate assets.
Case title: Union of India v. Ajay Kumar
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1413
The Delhi High Court has slammed the Railway authorities for forcing into litigation a medal-winning boxer, working under the sportspersons quota, for increments due to him.
Case title: Air India Limited v. Airport Employees Union (Regd.) & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1414
The Delhi High Court has ordered the Labour Court to reconsider the maintainability of an application filed by the Airport Employees Union against Air India Limited, seeking parity of pay for sub-contract workers.