Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1069 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1116NOMINAL INDEXNASIR MOHD SODOZEY @ AFTAAB AHMED @ ABDULLAH v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1069 Uday Jain & Anr. v. Additional Commissioner Customs Air Cargo And Import & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1070 Commissioner Of Customs (Airport And General) v. M/S Jaiswal Import Cargo Services Ltd 2025 LiveLaw...
Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1069 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1116
NOMINAL INDEX
NASIR MOHD SODOZEY @ AFTAAB AHMED @ ABDULLAH v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1069
Uday Jain & Anr. v. Additional Commissioner Customs Air Cargo And Import & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1070
Commissioner Of Customs (Airport And General) v. M/S Jaiswal Import Cargo Services Ltd 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1071
ANKIT RAJ v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1072
ASHISH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1073
ASIF HAMID KHAN v. STATE & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1074
M/S Tecmax Electronics v. The Principal Commissioner Of Customs (Import) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1075
Court On Its Own Motion v. Union Of India & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1076
SG v. DG 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1077
X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1078
NITA PURI v. UNION OF INDIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1079
Ritesh v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1080
Aakash Goel v. Election Commission of India & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1081
Hamzah Muneer & Anr v. Mohd Aqil & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1082
Arjan Dugal v. Shubham Gandhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1083
SNS ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. versus M/S HARIOM PROJECTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1084
SB v. HB 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1085
Woodland (Aero Club) Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 49(1), New Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1086
AMAN SATYA KACHROO TRUST v. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND ORS and other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1087
ICAR National Research Center Of Plant Biotechnology v. Azad Singh Dagar Prop M/S Servitor Intelligence 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1088
AISHWARYA RAI BACHCHAN v/s AISHWARYAWORLD.COM & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1089
Intec Capital Limited v Shekhar Chand Jain 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1090
Puneet Batra v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1091
SHYAM BHARTEEY v. CENTRAL BOARD OF FILM CERTIFICATION REGIONAL OFFICER DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1092
AMITA SACHDEVA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1093
ABHISHEK BACHCHAN v. THE BOLLYWOOD TEE SHOP & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1094
HARVEY MANN v. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1095
X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1096
Crest Digitel Private Limited v. DMRC & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1097
NAVIN M. RAHEJA & ANR v. DINESH GOYAL & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1098
Vishan Singh v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1099
Mamtaz Foundation Through Its Director v. Dental Council of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1100
Cembond Constructions Pvt Ltd v. NTPC 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1101
Sonaram Bagadaram Mali v. The Commissioner Of Custom & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1102
XX v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1103
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DELHI v. RAJESH KUMAR AGARWAL 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1104
GAUTAM SHARMA v. GOVT.OF NCT,DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1105
MV v. DS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1106
WOW MOMO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WOW BURGER & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1107
G v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1108
RAKESH BABU v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1109
SMT USHA SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. SWATI SHARMA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1110
Imran v. Commissioner Of Customs, IGI Airport 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1111
RAJ KAMAL YADAV & ANR v. SMT. MANJU YADAV & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1112
Vivek Kumar Singh v. Commissioner Of Customs A G & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1113
Raj Krishan Gupta And Ors v. Principal Director Of Income Tax (Investigation) -1 New Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1114
M/S Azure Hospitality Private Limited v. Amit Bhasin, Proprietor Of Retail India Solutions 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1115
Dinesh Kumar Verma v. Ramesh Ghai 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1116
Title: NASIR MOHD SODOZEY @ AFTAAB AHMED @ ABDULLAH v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1069
The Delhi High Court has denied relief to a man convicted for life in 2002 for being part of a “terrorist conspiracy” of abducting four foreign nationals with the objective of pressuring the Indian Government to release jailed militants.
Case title: Uday Jain & Anr. v. Additional Commissioner Customs Air Cargo And Import & Anr
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1070
The Delhi High Court has ordered the Customs Department to release the artwork of Padma Bhushan awardee Late BC Sanyal, seized amid a dispute surrounding its valuation.
Case title: Commissioner Of Customs (Airport And General) v. M/S Jaiswal Import Cargo Services Ltd
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1071
The Delhi High Court has held that a Customs Broker must diligently perform its responsibilities under the 2018 Licensing Regulations however, any failure thereof must be met with a proportionate punishment.
Title: ANKIT RAJ v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1072
The Delhi High Court has observed that when an independent and educated woman willingly continues to engage in a romantic relationship even with knowledge of her partner's marital status, it cannot be said that she was misled or exploited in law.
Title: ASHISH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1073
The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) to appoint a support person and provide counselling to a POCSO victim and her family in a case where she was repeatedly raped by her biological elder brother when she was a 15 year old minor, leading to her pregnancy which was later aborted.
Title: ASIF HAMID KHAN v. STATE & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1074
Citing Shakespeare, the Delhi High Court recently observed that despite stringent law and repeated lamentation about gender neutrality and equality, the psychology and mindset of men in workplace where sexual harassment continues to haunt women has remained unchanged, especially when it involves “Power-Dynamics.”
Case title: M/S Tecmax Electronics v. The Principal Commissioner Of Customs (Import)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1075
The Delhi High Court has held that the provision of pre-deposit for preferring an appeal before the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal is mandatory and the forum has no power to admit any appeal without the same.
Case title: Court On Its Own Motion v. Union Of India & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1076
The Delhi High Court has asked the Delhi Government to consider how the citizens here will know about the availability of beds and doctors in emergency situations through Health Management Information System (HMIS) software.
Title: SG v. DG
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1077
The Delhi High Court has said that a wife cannot be denied maintenance merely because she files an application for such a relief only after the husband files a divorce petition.
Title: X v. Y
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1078
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the presumption of a valid marriage is not diminished simply because there is no direct or positive proof of the ceremony of Saptapadi having taken place between the parties.
Title: NITA PURI v. UNION OF INDIA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1079
The Delhi High Court has observed that Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) investigation against a company citing public interest is an extremely serious statutory action and an order to that effect must reflect due application of mind.
Case title: Ritesh v. State
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1080
The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR lodged against an Agniveer— attached with a unit of the Indian Army, over discovery of live ammunition from his baggage while travelling from Delhi to Kolkata.
Title: Aakash Goel v. Election Commission of India & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1081
The Delhi High Court refused to entertain a PIL highlighting the issue of unchecked and excessive political expenditure, misuse of government machinery during elections, lack of voter awareness and need for electoral reforms.
Case title: Hamzah Muneer & Anr v. Mohd Aqil & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1082
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that the grandchildren of a Muslim man are excluded from his estate only if, upon his demise, he is survived by a son or daughter.
Case title: Arjan Dugal v. Shubham Gandhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1083
The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to a city-based clothing label run by designer Arjan Dugal, in his suit filed against a former employee over alleged infringement of his trade dress, original artistic work.
Case Title: SNS ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. versus M/S HARIOM PROJECTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1084
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh has held that absence of the word 'seat' does not strip the court of its exclusive jurisdiction to decide disputes arising out of an arbitration agreement.
Case title: SB v. HB
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1085
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a wife cannot be denied maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 merely because she is highly qualified and employed.
Case title: Woodland (Aero Club) Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 49(1), New Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1086
The Delhi High Court has held that an employer can claim deduction of employees' contributions towards Provident Fund or Employer's State Insurance Fund, held by it in trust, only if it deposits these amounts on or before the statutory due date prescribed under the relevant labour law.
Title: AMAN SATYA KACHROO TRUST v. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND ORS and other connected matter
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1087
Observing that students suicide are becoming more frequent, the Delhi High Court has emphasised that a proper, functional and effective Anti-Ragging Helpline is an immediate and utmost necessity.
Case title: ICAR National Research Center Of Plant Biotechnology v. Azad Singh Dagar Prop M/S Servitor Intelligence
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1088
The Delhi High Court observed that while procedure is handmaiden of justice and technicalities must not be allowed to infringe upon substantive rights of parties however, the procedural requirements cannot be “trashed” in the name of substantive rights.
Case title: AISHWARYA RAI BACHCHAN v/s AISHWARYAWORLD.COM & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1089
The Delhi High Court has protected the personality rights of bollywood actress Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, observing that unauthorized exploitation of personal attributes of an individual violates right to privacy and undermines the right to live with dignity.
Case Title – Intec Capital Limited v Shekhar Chand Jain
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1090
The Delhi High Court Bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh has observed that contemporaneously executed Loan Agreement and Deeds of Guarantee, where the intent of the parties to incorporate the Loan Agreement into the Deeds of Guarantee is clear, the Guarantor although a non-signatory to the Loan Agreement, becomes bound by the arbitration clause in the Loan Agreement.
Case title: Puneet Batra v. Union of India & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1091
The Delhi High Court has cautioned the GST Department against accessing the computer device of any advocate, in his absence or without his consent.
Title: SHYAM BHARTEEY v. CENTRAL BOARD OF FILM CERTIFICATION REGIONAL OFFICER DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1092
The Delhi High Court has ruled that in a diverse and secular society, certification cannot be granted to a film that ridicules religions, incites hatred or threatens social harmony.
Title: AMITA SACHDEVA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1093
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition challenging a trial court order refusing to register an FIR against the Delhi Art Gallery and its Directors over exhibition of two allegedly offensive paintings of Indian painter MF Husain on Hindu deities.
Title: ABHISHEK BACHCHAN v. THE BOLLYWOOD TEE SHOP & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1094
The Delhi High Court has passed an interim order protecting the personality rights of Bollywood actor Abhishek Bachchan by restraining various entities from misusing his image, name, voice or other elements of his persona for monetary gains without his consent or authorization.
Title: HARVEY MANN v. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1095
The Delhi High Court has asked the trial court here to pass fresh order on charge against a man accused of displaying aggressive and abusive behaviour in an Air India flight.
Title: X v. Y
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1096
The Delhi High Court has observed that there is no statutory basis at present recognising the contributions of homemakers in taking care of the household, family and children, “which remain hidden and downplayed,” for making any determination on their ownership rights, or even to quantify the value of such contributions.
Case title: Crest Digitel Private Limited v. DMRC & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1097
The Delhi High Court has emphasized that upgradation of telecom infrastructure is of paramount importance and is an integral part of the Delhi Airport Metro Express Line, a lifeline for Delhi travellers connecting IGI Airport to New Delhi Railway Station.
Not Mandatory For Two-Member Bench Of NCDRC To Be Comprised Of A Judicial Member: Delhi High Court
Title: NAVIN M. RAHEJA & ANR v. DINESH GOYAL & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1098
The Delhi High Court has ruled that it is not mandatory for a two member bench of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) to necessarily comprise of a judicial member.
Case title: Vishan Singh v. State
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1099
The Delhi High Court has held that the right to speedy trial of an accused, though sacrosanct, cannot be stretched in cases where there is overwhelming evidence of guilt against the accused.
Case title: Mamtaz Foundation Through Its Director v. Dental Council of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1100
The Delhi High Court has upheld the vires of Clause 6(2)(e) of the Dental Council of India (Establishment of New Dental Colleges, Opening of New or Higher Course of Study or Training and increase of Admission Capacity in Dental Colleges) Regulations, 2006— which relates to permission for establishment of new dental college, new courses of study, etc.
Case title: Cembond Constructions Pvt Ltd v. NTPC
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1101
The Delhi High Court has held that a debarment order issued by one entity cannot be extended to other group companies without any independent opportunity of hearing through a separate show cause notice.
Case title: Sonaram Bagadaram Mali v. The Commissioner Of Custom & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1102
The Delhi High Court has held that misleading consumers about locally manufactured goods by labelling them as 'Made in China' or in some other foreign country is contrary to public interest.
Title: XX v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1103
The law must clearly delineate the balance between maternal autonomy and foetal rights at the stage of viability, the Delhi High Court observed.
Title: DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DELHI v. RAJESH KUMAR AGARWAL
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1104
The Delhi High Court ruled that allowing retention of seized property without strict adherence to PMLA provisions would amount to a violation of the legislative mandate of the enactment and would undermine the very purpose of incorporating procedural safeguards therein.
Title: GAUTAM SHARMA v. GOVT.OF NCT,DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1105
The Delhi High Court has observed that the relationship between two consenting adults, even when one is married, cannot be approached by Courts with an outdated lens, adding that judges cannot impose their personal morality upon such individuals.
Case title: MV v. DS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1106
The Delhi High Court upheld a family court order taking into account two years old Income Tax Returns of a husband, an advocate by profession, to determine his financial capacity to pay maintenance to his wife.
Title: WOW MOMO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WOW BURGER & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1107
The Delhi High Court has refused to grant interim injunction in favour of “WOW MOMO”, an Indian quick-service restaurant chain, in its trademark infringement suit filed against a Hong Kong-based company “WOW BURGER.”
Wife Can Be Denied Maintenance Upon Failure To Produce Latest Salary Slips: Delhi High Court
Case title: G v. State
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1108
The Delhi High Court has held that Courts can draw adverse inference of a wife's failure to produce her latest salary slips, in order to show insufficiency of income or financial hardship, to claim maintenance from husband.
BSF Act Empowers General Security Force Court To Try POCSO Offences: Delhi High Court
Title: RAKESH BABU v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1109
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the BSF Act empowers the General Security Force Court (GSFC) to try an offence under the POCSO Act.
Title: SMT USHA SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. SWATI SHARMA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1110
The Delhi High Court has fined a woman for dragging aged in-laws in Court through endless litigation even after the death of their son, all the while remarrying another man.
Delhi High Court Directs Customs Department To Set Up Passenger Grievance Counters At Delhi Airport
Case title: Imran v. Commissioner Of Customs, IGI Airport
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1111
The Delhi High Court has asked the Commissioner of Customs at the IGI Airport to create some counters of the Department outside the airport's security zone, for easy access of aggrieved passengers.
Title: RAJ KAMAL YADAV & ANR v. SMT. MANJU YADAV & other connected matter
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1112
The Delhi High Court has quashed a summoning order passed against a husband's distant relatives while rapping the wife for roping them in the matrimonial dispute, without any cogent evidence.
Delhi High Court Grants Relief To National-Level Taekwondo Player In Alleged Gold Smuggling Case
Case title: Vivek Kumar Singh v. Commissioner Of Customs A G & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1113
The Delhi High Court has granted relief to a 19 year old, national-level taekwondo player, allegedly involved in gold smuggling at the instance of his coach, while returning to the country from a Championship in Thailand in 2022.
Case title: Raj Krishan Gupta And Ors v. Principal Director Of Income Tax (Investigation) -1 New Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1114
The Delhi High Court has upheld the surprise search and seizure conducted by the Income Tax Department at the private lockers maintained by a family at South Delhi Vaults, without issuance of prior notice or summons to them.
Case Name: M/S Azure Hospitality Private Limited v. Amit Bhasin, Proprietor Of Retail India Solutions
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1115
The Delhi High Court division bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain, while hearing a Section 37(1)(b) appeal under the Arbitration Act, observed that using the subject brand names after a dispute between the parties can cause enormous confusion to the public. People may associate the Respondent's outlets with the Appellants.
Plaintiff Has No Vested Right To File Replication Under CPC: Delhi High Court
Case title: Dinesh Kumar Verma v. Ramesh Ghai
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1116
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that filing of replication by a Plaintiff is only judicially sanctioned and is not a statutory right of the party.