Click the Play button to listen to article

Citations 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 959 to 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 990

NOMINAL INDEX

ZUBER ALI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 959

SHAIKH MUJTABA FAROOQ & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS and other connected matters 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 960

MS. PRIYA SAHANI @ POOJA & ORS v. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 961

ABHAY GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 962

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION REGARDING COMPLAINCE WITH THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE SUPREME COURT & other connected matters 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 963

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION REGARDING COMPLAINCE WITH THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE SUPREME COURT & other connected matters 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 963

RAM DEVI v. THE STATE & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 965

FEDERATION OF NEHRU PLACE ASSOCIATIONS v. GYANESH BHARTI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 966

ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL v. SUSHIL DEWAN & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 967

LUV BHARDWAJ v. CBI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 968

M/S SUJATA HOTELS PVT LTD v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 969

Chahat Raghav v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 970

HARINDER DAHIYA v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 971

VICKY @ VIKKY v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 972

JYOTI SINGH & ANR v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 973

SUNIL RAJAN JAAT v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 974

MINOR P THR HER GUARDIAN K v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 975

DIPINDER KAUR v. BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 976

Mrs. Shakti Sagar v. The Delhi Law House & Ors. 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 977

Vishal Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 978

SACHIN KUMAR DAKSH v. DIRECTOR-ADMIN AND FINANCE & ANR 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 979

JAIVEER SINGH v. STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 980

CENTRAL SECRETARIAT CLUB v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 981

SAURABH DIKSHIT v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 982

DELHI PROSECUTORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 983

TAJINDER MOHAN SINGH v. THE STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 984

Shishir Chand v. Jai Anant Dehadrai & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 985

CBI v. Kuldeep Singh & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 986

AMITABH BACHCHAN v. RAJAT NAGI & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 987

Janta Live Press Network Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Google LLC & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 988

VIJAY SAI DEVERAKONDA v. ASHOK KUMAR JOHN DOE & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 989

X v. Y 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 990

Consider Proposal For Dedicated POCSO Investigation Teams In Police Stations: Delhi High Court Directs Police Commissioner

Case Title : ZUBER ALI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 959

The Delhi High Court has directed the Commissioner of Delhi Police to take appropriate steps to decide a plea seeking the setting up of dedicated POCSO investigation teams in every police district of the national capital.

Delhi Riots, Jamia Violence: High Court Dismisses Pleas Seeking Independent Probe, FIRs Against Politicians

Case Title : SHAIKH MUJTABA FAROOQ & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS and other connected matters

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 960

The Delhi High Court dismissed a batch of petitions seeking SIT or independent investigation into the 2020 North East Delhi riots and 2019 violence which broke out in Jamia Milia Islamia University.

Delhi High Court Quashes Arms Act FIR After Settlement, Directs Accused To Pay ₹1 Lakh To Environmental Action Group

Case Title : MS. PRIYA SAHANI @ POOJA & ORS v. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 961

The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered for attempt to murder as well as under provisions of Arms Act after the parties amicably settled their dispute, while directing four accused to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 each to an environmental organisation.

No Time Limit For Deciding Dual PAN Cancellation Applications May Cause Hardship To Taxpayers: Delhi High Court To CBDT

Case Title : ABHAY GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 962

The Delhi High Court has asked the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to consider and decide a plea seeking prescription of a timeframe for deciding applications for cancellation or surrender of duplicate Permanent Account Numbers (PANs).

Stray Dogs: Delhi High Court Directs MCD, NDMC To Hold Training Camp For Veterinary Staff, Dog Catchers

Case Title : Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION REGARDING COMPLAINCE WITH THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE SUPREME COURT & other connected matters

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 963

The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and New Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) to hold a camp for training of its officials for veterinary, para-veterinary and catching stray dogs in the national capital.

Wholesale Reproduction Of News Videos Not Fair Dealing: Delhi High Court Grants Relief To ANI In Copyright Suit Against RSY News

Case Title : ANI MEDIA PVT LTD v. RSY NEWS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 964

Observing that wholesale reproduction of copyrighted news videos cannot be treated as “fair dealing” for reporting current events, the Delhi High Court has ruled in favour of news agency Asian News International (ANI) in its copyright infringement suit against RSY News.

Matrimonial Discord Without Positive Incitement Can't Amount To Abetment Of Suicide: Delhi High Court

Case Title : RAM DEVI v. THE STATE & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 965

The Delhi High Court has held that mere matrimonial discord, emotional outbursts or disappointment in a marriage cannot by themselves constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), unless there is a positive act of encouragement or incitement by the accused.

Delhi High Court Declares Nehru Place No-Hawking, No-Vending Zone; MCD Free To Remove Unauthorized Vendors After October 12

Case Title : FEDERATION OF NEHRU PLACE ASSOCIATIONS v. GYANESH BHARTI & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 966

The Delhi High Court has declared the Nehru Place District Centre area as a “No-hawking zone” and “No-vending zone”.

Delhi High Court Orders Criminal Complaint Against 6 CBI Officers For Making False Statement In Court

Case Title : ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL v. SUSHIL DEWAN & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 967

The Delhi High Court has directed registration of a criminal complaint against six CBI officers for making a false statement before the court regarding correspondence with the administrative Ministry.

Past Compliance With Travel Conditions Doesn't Give Accused Indefeasible Right To Repeated Foreign Travel: Delhi High Court

Case Title : LUV BHARDWAJ v. CBI

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 968

The Delhi High Court has observed that an accused's compliance with conditions imposed during previous foreign travel cannot, by itself, confer an “indefeasible entitlement” to seek permission for foreign travel at successive intervals.

IRCTC Scam: Delhi High Court Stays Trial Court Order Framing Money Laundering Charges Against Hotel

Case Title : M/S SUJATA HOTELS PVT LTD v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 969

The Delhi High Court has stayed a trial court order directing framing of charges against Sujata Hotels in a money laundering case connected to the alleged IRCTC scam case.

Delhi High Court Directs Centre To Decide Within 6 Months Plea Seeking Mandatory Body-Worn Cameras For Police During Protest-Control Duties

Case Title : Chahat Raghav v. Union of India & Ors

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 970

The Delhi High Court directed the Centre to treat a PIL seeking directions for framing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) making body-worn cameras (BWCs) compulsory and “always-on” for personnel deployed on crowd-control and protest-management duties, as a representation and decide it within 6 months.

Money Laundering Case: Delhi High Court Permits Vivo India Finance Director To Travel Abroad, Suspends LOC For Four Days

Case Title : HARINDER DAHIYA v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 971

The Delhi High Court has permitted Vivo Mobile India Private Limited's Senior Director (Finance and Accounts) to travel to Bangkok, Thailand, for four days.

POCSO Act | Young Age Of Accused, Romantic Relationship Are 'Mitigating' Factors For Bail: Delhi High Court

Case Title : VICKY @ VIKKY v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 972

The Delhi High Court has observed that the young age of an accused and a minor victim, coupled with their intimate and romantic relationship, can constitute mitigating factors while considering a bail plea in a case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act).

Maintenance Can't Be Frustrated Merely Because Husband Is Absconding, Courts Must Take Steps To Trace Him: Delhi High Court

Case Title : JYOTI SINGH & ANR v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 973

The Delhi High Court has held that an absconding husband, being the judgment debtor, cannot be permitted to frustrate a maintenance order by evading the process of the Court.

Delhi High Court Allows Murder Convict To Lead Additional Evidence Based On PTI News Report On Victim's Identity

Case Title : SUNIL RAJAN JAAT v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 974

The Delhi High Court allowed a murder convict sentenced to life imprisonment to lead additional evidence based on a PTI news report concerning the identity of the deceased, observing that the report may have a bearing on the outcome of his appeal.

Delhi High Court Permits 16-Yr-Old Abandoned By Parents To Undergo Medical Termination Of 26-Week Pregnancy After Sexual Assault

Case Title : MINOR P THR HER GUARDIAN K v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 975

The Delhi High Court has permitted a 16-year-old girl, who has been abandoned by her parents, to undergo medical termination of her pregnancy at around 26 weeks following a sexual assault.

Mere Fabricated Caste Certificate Not Enough To Remove Advocate From State Rolls: Delhi High Court

Case Title : DIPINDER KAUR v. BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 976

The Delhi High Court has held that merely furnishing a fabricated caste certificate cannot justify removal of an advocate from the State Bar rolls unless the alleged fraud or misrepresentation is shown to have a nexus with obtaining enrolment.

Delhi High Court Refuses To Restrain Delhi Law House From Selling 47 Law Books Over Copyright Title Claim

Case Title : Mrs. Shakti Sagar v. The Delhi Law House & Ors.

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 977

The Delhi High Court has refused to restrain Delhi Law House and its associated entities or persons from publishing and selling 47 law books, holding that Shakti Sagar, who filed the suit, failed to establish a prima facie copyright right in the works.

Delhi High Court Slams Cop Over 'Sham Paperwork' In Cyber-fraud Probe, Grants Bail To Man After 10 Months In Jail

Case Title : Vishal Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 978

The Delhi High Court has pulled up the Delhi Police's investigating officer for conducting a cyber-fraud investigation through what it termed “sham paperwork”, while granting bail to a 27-year-old man who had remained in custody for nearly 10 months.

Public Funds Used For Employee's LTC, CGHS Reimbursement Don't Justify Disclosure Of Personal Details Under RTI: Delhi High Court

Case Title : SACHIN KUMAR DAKSH v. DIRECTOR-ADMIN AND FINANCE & ANR

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 979

The Delhi High Court has held that merely because certain benefits availed by a government employee involve expenditure from public funds, it does not make the underlying personal information liable to disclosure under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

Inordinate Delay In Filing Chargesheet Violates Accused's Right To Speedy Investigation And Trial: Delhi High Court

Case Title : JAIVEER SINGH v. STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 980

The Delhi High Court has held that an inordinate delay in filing a chargesheet can violate an accused's fundamental right to a speedy investigation and trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Following Eviction, Delhi High Court Allows Central Secretariat Club Officers To Access Premises And Collect Belongings

Case Title : CENTRAL SECRETARIAT CLUB v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 981

The Delhi High Court has directed the Central Government to allow two officers of the Central Secretariat Club to access its premises and collect their belongings, after its office bearers were evicted from the property.

Appoint State Commissioner For Persons With Disabilities Within Four Weeks: High Court To Delhi Govt

Case Title : SAURABH DIKSHIT v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 982

The Delhi High Court has asked the Delhi Government to take steps to appoint the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities for the National Capital Territory within four weeks.

Delhi High Court Stays Order Making Aadhaar-Based Biometric Attendance Mandatory For Public Prosecutors

Case Title : DELHI PROSECUTORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 983

The Delhi High Court has stayed an order issued by the Delhi Government's Directorate of Prosecution making Aadhaar-enabled biometric attendance compulsory for public prosecutors, additional public prosecutors and assistant public prosecutors.

Delhi High Court Directs Trial Courts To Verify Accused's Address Before Declaring Them Absconders

Case Title : TAJINDER MOHAN SINGH v. THE STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI)

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 984

The Delhi High Court has directed all trial courts in the national capital to verify whether an accused is deliberately evading summons or arrest before declaring them an absconder or a proclaimed offender, cautioning that the pendency of criminal cases cannot justify such orders without cogent grounds.

Bench Change Can't Be Sought As A Matter Of Right After Roster Change: Delhi High Court

Case Title : Shishir Chand v. Jai Anant Dehadrai & Anr

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 985

The Delhi High Court has observed that a litigant cannot claim a change of Bench as a matter of right merely because of a change in the roster, noting that the decision to release a part-heard matter depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.

Excise Policy: Delhi High Court Rejects Plea For Preliminary Hearing Over Maintainability Of CBI Plea Against Discharge

Case Title : CBI v. Kuldeep Singh & Ors

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 986

The Delhi High Court rejected a plea seeking a preliminary hearing on the objection to the maintainability of the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) revision petition challenging the discharge of 23 accused persons in the alleged liquor policy scam case.

Delhi High Court Directs Amitabh Bachchan To Appear Personally If Settlement In Personality Rights Suit Fails

Case Title : AMITABH BACHCHAN v. RAJAT NAGI & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 987

The Delhi High Court has granted time to actor Amitabh Bachchan to complete the formalities of an amicable settlement reached with some defendants in his personality rights suit.

Google Does Not Perform Public Functions Merely By Providing Email Services: Delhi High Court

Case Title : Janta Live Press Network Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Google LLC & Ors

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 988

The Delhi High Court has held that Google LLC does not perform a public function merely by providing email services. It further held that the provision of email accounts and their suspension or disabling on security grounds does not, by itself, constitute the discharge of a public duty.

Delhi High Court Protects Actor Vijay Deverakonda's Personality Rights Against AI Deepfakes, Obscene Content

Case Title : VIJAY SAI DEVERAKONDA v. ASHOK KUMAR JOHN DOE & ORS

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 989

The Delhi High Court has passed an interim injunction order protecting actor Vijay Deverakonda's personality rights.

Retirement Corpus Can't Be Treated As Monthly Income While Deciding Maintenance: Delhi High Court

Case Title : X v. Y

CITATION : 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 990

The Delhi High Court has observed that a spouse's retirement corpus cannot be treated as recurring monthly income while deciding a claim for interim maintenance.

Tags: