LiveLaw Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: June 08 to June 14, 2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 198 to Citation 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 207Nominal Index: Shreyansh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 198Seemabai v Basantilal 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 199Smt Savita v Deepak 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 200Child In Conflict v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 201Mulam Singh Gond v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 202Haji Abdul Rajjak v State of Madhya Pradesh...
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 198 to Citation 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 207
Nominal Index:
- Shreyansh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 198
- Seemabai v Basantilal 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 199
- Smt Savita v Deepak 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 200
- Child In Conflict v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 201
- Mulam Singh Gond v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 202
- Haji Abdul Rajjak v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 203
- Shyam Sundar v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 204
- Smt Chanda Bai v Mayaram 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 205
- John v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 206
- Krashnanu Sharma v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 207
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has granted anticipatory bail to the film producer of a recent feature film, "Lucky", in a criminal case arising out of an alleged violation of the film financing agreement.
Case Title: Shreyansh v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-24332-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 198
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has awarded maintenance to a woman and her son after holding that an adverse interference could be drawn against a man who refused to undergo a DNA fingerprinting test sought to establish the child's paternity.
The court observed that proceedings under Section 125 CrPC are welfare-oriented in nature and do not require strict proof of marriage as is necessary in criminal prosecutions for bigamy.
Case Title: Seemabai v Basantilal, CRR-4517-2022
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 199
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has enhanced the maintenance of the two daughters, emphasising that a father is obligated to provide for the education expenses of his daughters.
Case Title: Smt Savita v Deepak, CRR-1560-2022
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 200
The Madhya Pradesh High Court granted bail to a child-in-conflict-with-the-law booked in a murder case, after taking note of the probation officer's report which indicated the possibility of improvement in the conduct of the child under proper carer and family supervision.
The court thus directed the applicant's release and directed handing over custody to the applicant's father on him furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 along with one one solvent surety to the JJB/court's satisfaction, subject to certain conditions.
Case Title: Child In Conflict v State of Madhya Pradesh, CRR-1704-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 201
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has granted anticipatory bail to a man who was accused of driving a car allegedly used in the kidnapping of a woman from the SC/ST Community.
The bench of Justice Ramkumar Choubey noted that despite the applicant's representation seeking examination of CCTV footage to support his claim that he was not driving the vehicle at the time of the incident, the State failed to place the report on record.
Case Title: Mulam Singh Gond v State of Madhya Pradesh, CRA-3818-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 202
The Madhya Pradesh High Court had said where a person is under statutory arrest pursuant to multiple FIRs disclosing cognizable offences the remedy of habeas corpus cannot be granted specially wherein previous detention orders had been revoked and the person is not under illegal detention.
Case Title: Haji Abdul Rajjak v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-27476-2025
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 203
Writ Court Can't Grant Interim Relief After Relegating Party To Alternative Forum: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has clarified that once a writ court has refused to entertain a petition and directed the petitioner to seek an alternative forum, it cannot exercise its jurisdiction to pass an interim order.
Case Title: Shyam Sundar v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-19938-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 204
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has substantially enhanced the compensation awarded to a woman and her daughter from ₹10,00 to ₹10 Lakh in a domestic violence case, noting that her husband's family filed a civil suit and obtained a decree, thereby depriving the woman benefit of maintenance which was already settled in her favour.
Case Title: Smt Chanda Bai v Mayaram, CRR. No. 3517 of 2019
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 205
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has denied anticipatory bail to a husband who is accused of causing injuries to his wife in order to raise the demand of Rs. 5 lakh and attempting to commit unnatural sexual acts with her, noting that the allegations were serious in nature.
Case Title: John v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-20592-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 206
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has granted bail to a man accused of videographing the women admitted in the Maternity/Labour Ward, observing that the State was not able to show any material from the case diary.
Case Title: Krashnanu Sharma v State of Madhya Pradesh, CRA-4480-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 207