Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: November 17 - November 23, 2025
Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 248 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 260Nominal IndexTushar v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 248Devisingh v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 249Rafiq Khan v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 250 Raju Dhurvey v Union 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 251Sitarani v Dal Singh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 252 Shyama Verma v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 253Sonu v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 254Vaishali Chaturvedi v State of Madhya Pradesh...
Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 248 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 260
Nominal Index
- Tushar v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 248
- Devisingh v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 249
- Rafiq Khan v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 250
- Raju Dhurvey v Union 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 251
- Sitarani v Dal Singh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 252
- Shyama Verma v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 253
- Sonu v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 254
- Vaishali Chaturvedi v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 255
- Sawan Bohra v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 256
- SC v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 257
- Abdul Majid v Union 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 258
- AD v PS 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 259
- Ojas Construction through its Partner Rachna Pathak vs. The State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 260
Externment Without Material Evidence Violates Personal Liberty: MP High Court Sets Aside DM's Order
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed that an externment order under MP Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990, cannot be passed mechanically as it casts serious restrictions on the fundamental rights and personal liberty of any person.
In doing so, the division bench of Chief Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Vinay Saraf set aside the externment order, noting lack of material showing any immediate engagement of the offender in the commission of the offence.
Case Title: Tushar v State [Writ Appeal 1035 of 2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 248
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Friday (November 14), dismissed the bail application of a man accused of illegal hunting in Son Chidiya Sanctuary, Ghatigaon, observing that offences involving wildlife poaching have grave implications for wildlife preservation and ecological balance and must, therefore, be addressed sternly.
Case Title: Devisingh v State [MCRC-50970-2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 249
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Monday (17 November), granted anticipatory bail to News Reporter Rafiq Khan, who is accused of editing and manipulating a video that went viral on Tej India YouTube channel, purportedly showing a Head Constable of Ratlam receiving a bribe from an autorikshaw driver.
Case Title: Rafiq Khan v State [MCRC-46585-2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 250
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has emphasized that every passenger, irrespective of the class in which they are travelling, is entitled to equal standards of safety, care and vigilance from the Railway Administration.
In doing so, the bench of Justice Himanshu Joshi held the Railway liable for failing to ensure safe travelling conditions after a passenger lost both his legs due to falling from an overcrowded train.
Case Title: Raju Dhurvey v Union [MA-648-2017]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 251
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has reiterated that an order dismissing an application for want of prosecution is not directly appealable and that the correct remedy would be to seek restoration of the application under Order IX Rule 4 read with Section 151 of CPC.
Case Title: Sitarani v Dal Singh [MA-2469-2014]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 252
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has quashed an administrative order that denied seniority and regularization to a daily rated employee, observing that the authorities acted in an unreasonable and discriminatory manner, contrary to the constitutional mandates of equality (Article 14) and equal opportunity in public employment (Article 16).
Case Title: Shyama Verma v State [WP-5855-2018]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 253
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Tuesday (November 18), held that jewellery seized from a man accused of theft, with prima facie verified bills, cannot be kept in the custody of the police indefinitely in anticipation that the unidentified complainant would come forward to claim rightful possession.
Case Title: Sonu v State [MCRC-48689-2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 254
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has clarified that vacancies reserved for persons with disabilities, which had been identified as far back as 2019 but were advertised only in 2023, would be treated as backlog vacancies.
Case Title: Vaishali Chaturvedi v State of Madhya Pradesh [WP 19248 of 2024]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 255
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Wednesday (November 19), held that the amendment introduced in the MP Medical Education Admission Rules, 2018, which barred students who have completed their MBBS from institutions outside Madhya Pradesh from seeking admission to post-graduate medical courses in the private colleges in the State, was unconstitutional.
Case Title: Sawan Bohra v State [WP no 38169 of 2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 256
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Tuesday (November 18), dismissed a habeas corpus petition by maternal uncle of a Hindu woman, observing that she was a major, was not in wrongful confinement and was living with respondent no 4 (a muslim man) out of her own free will.
Case Title: SC v State [WP-43434-2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 257
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Thursday (November 20), granted an opportunity of hearing to Abdul Majid in his petition challenging the notice issued by the Cantonment Board Office for the removal of illegal encroachment over certain parts of his residential house.
For context, the disputed property is the ancestral home of Hammad Ahmed, father of Jawad Ahmed Siddiqui, founder of Al-Falah University & chairman of Al-Falah Group.
Case Title: Abdul Majid v Union [WP-45707-2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 258
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in an appeal filed by a husband challenging the Family Court's dismissal of his divorce petition on grounds of cruelty and desertion, has observed that for the ground of desertion to apply, the intention to permanently abandon the marital relationship must be established.
Case Title: AD v PS [FA-1360-2024]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 259
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed writ petition by a builder seeking reimbursement or refund of differential 6% GST on account of increase in rate (from 12% to 18%) on government works contract w.e.f. July 18, 2022.
Case Name: Ojas Construction through its Partner Rachna Pathak vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [Writ Petition No. 39844 of 2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 260