Jaising cites sec 124 of the Delhi Police Act which clarifies that there's no impunity provided to the police for using disproportionate force or causing unreasonable violence
Jaising: These sections impose duty of proportionality and reasonableness on police force
Jaising: When no student was arrested, what was the purpose of entering the campus.
'The intention was sheer vindictiveness, teaching a lesson to the students with a danda', she argues
Jaising: Where is the demand from the police to enter the University campus? z they had the loudspeakers, phones, walkie-talkie, but they didn't make a demand for entering the campus
Jaising cites sections 46 and 47 of the CrPC to argue that the police should've taken the prior permission of the University before the entering the campus
'Law has to take its own course against the police as well. Just because you wear an uniform, it doesn't give you a right to blind a student. Police must be ready to face the trial', Jaising argues
Jaising argues that it's an act of sheer vindictiveness and madness on the part of the police
Stones and bottles are not firearms', Jaising argues
Jaising argues that institutions are given independence for a reason and the same shall be respected
'It's a check on arbitrary use of police power', she argues
Jaising: Universities across the world have arisen from the context from autonomy; they're free to make even their laws