Bombay High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal's Decision To Impose Interest On Keyana Estate For Delayed Possession Case – Keyana Estate LLP (Earlier Known as Kiyana Ventures LLP) Versus Paresh Parihar & Anr Citation - Second Appeal No. 537 of 2025 With Interim Application No. 11757 Of 2025 The Bombay High Court bench,...
Bombay High Court
Case – Keyana Estate LLP (Earlier Known as Kiyana Ventures LLP) Versus Paresh Parihar & Anr
Citation - Second Appeal No. 537 of 2025 With Interim Application No. 11757 Of 2025
The Bombay High Court bench, comprising Justice N. J. Jamadar, upheld the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal's (“Tribunal”) decision holding Keyana Estate liable for the delay in handing over possession.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: Ajay Chaturvedi & Ors. vs. Ajanta Hospital & IVF Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Case No.: FIRST APPEAL NO. 831 of 2022
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, bench comprising Justice A.P. Sahi, President, and Mr. Bharatkumar Pandya, Member, set aside the order of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission that had held the appellants liable for medical negligence leading to the death of Shyam Sunder Chaturvedi, and partly allowed the appeal
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)
Case Title: Sumit Sharma & Ors. Vs. Mantra Lifestyle Homes Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
CC No. 54 of 2024
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) bench comprising Justice Sudip Ahluwalia (President) and Dr. Sadhna Shanker (Member) allowed a complaint filed against Mantra Lifestyle Homes Pvt. Ltd., holding that the builder's failure to deliver possession and obtain occupancy certificates despite receiving payments amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench Amravati
Case Title: Dr. Sau Majushree Murli Boob Vs. Aryan Vijay Ambore
Case No.: SC/CB3/27/A/86/2020
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench Amravati, comprising Smt. K. S. Kapse, Presiding Member and Smt. S. D. Wandhare, Member, has held doctor not liable for the death of the complainant's mother and set aside the order of the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Amravati, finding no medical negligence on doctor's part.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai
Case Title: Mahesh Dashrath Gaikwad vs Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd
Case Number: Consumer Complaint No. 18/2019
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai bench comprising Mukesh Sharma, Presiding member and Poonam Maharshi, Member has held Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. liable for wrongfully repudiating the claim of the complainant in respect of his vehicle.
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: ASHOK MARWAH VS. M/S PARSVNATH DEV. LTD
Case No: CC23/2025
The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided over by Hon'ble Ms. Bimla Kumari, allowed the complaint against Parsvnath Developers Ltd., holding that the builder's failure to deliver possession of the flat within the stipulated period, despite receiving full payment, amounts to deficiency of service and unfair trade practice. The Commission further directed the builder to refund the entire amount paid along with interest and awarded compensation for mental agony and litigation costs.
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: NAUSHAD AHMED VS. CORPORATION BANK & ORS
Case No: FA-545/2019
The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Bimla Kumari, Presiding Member, has allowed the appeal against Corporation Bank (now Union Bank of India) concerning fraudulent withdrawal of ₹4,80,000/- from appelant's account, set aside the District Forum's order dated 13.09.2019, and remanded the matter back to the District Forum for adjudication on merits at the earliest.
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: Rajeev Menon vs E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Case Number: Complaint No. 1450/2018
The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission bench comprising Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President and Pinki, Judicial Member has held E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. liable for charging an extra amount for the flat booked by the complainants at a belated stage under the guise of GST and Service Tax. The bench also held the builder liable for arbitrarily cancelling the allotment of the flat.
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: SHEKHAR SHARMA VS ARN INFRASTRUCTURES INDIA
Case No.: 277/2013
The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission bench comprising Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President, Ms. Pinki, Member (Judicial), and Mr. J.P. Agrawal, Member (General) has held ARN Infrastructures India Pvt. Ltd. liable for deficiency in service, unfair trade practices, and breach of agreement for failing to provide valid possession and completion certificate of the booked unit, and directed the builder to refund ₹10 lakh to the complainant along with monthly assured returns, interest, and additional compensation for mental agony and litigation costs.
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: MAX BALAJI HOSPITAL & ANR. VS SMT. N.R. MISHRA
Case No.: FIRST APPEAL NO.-110/2015
The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal (President) and Mr. Anil Srivastava (Member), dismissed the appeal filed by Max Balaji Hospital and Dr. L. Tomar, thereby affirming the District Commission's finding of medical negligence and the award of ₹5,00,000 as compensation to the complainant, Smt. N.R. Mishra.
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title : Brijesh Kumar Sharma vs Instant Healthcare Private Ltd
FIRST APPEAL NO.- FA/491/2017
The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Ms. Pinki (Judicial Member) and Ms. Bimla Kumari (Member), has held Instant Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (insurance agent) and Bharti AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. jointly and severally liable for deficiency in service for failing to inform the insured about the cancellation of a Mediclaim policy and for not returning the premium. The Commission while allowing the appeal filed by the complainant directed that the opposite parties to reimburse the medical expenses with interest.
Mumbai State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: Emirates Airlines vs Dr. Keshab Nandy
Case Number: Appeal No. A/2021/15
The Mumbai State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission bench comprising S.P Tavade, President and Vijay C. Premchandani, Member has held Emirates Airlines liable for forcing the complainants to pay a premium amount to pre-book their flight seats and not providing correct information regarding availability of free seats.
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case title: CHAYYA SHARMA VS. SBI & ANR.
Case No.: First Appeal 106/2011
The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Ms. Bimla Kumari, Presiding Member, found SBI guilty of deficiency in service for dishonoring 11 EMIs via ECS and wrongly charging bounce fees, despite sufficient balance in the customer's account. The Commission set aside the District Forum's order and directed SBI to pay ₹1,50,000 for mental agony and ₹20,000 in litigation costs, with 7% interest on delayed payment.
Barmer District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan
Case Title: Mohammad Shadab Alam v. South Eastern Railway & Ors.
Case No.: 203/2021
The Barmer District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, comprising Shri Chandanaram Chaudhary (President) and Smt. Sarita Parik (Member), held the authorities of South Eastern Railway liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice for failing to provide a paid bedroll to a passenger.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kupwara
Case Title: Madina Electricals vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd.
Case No.: CC 08/2017
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kupwara, comprising Peerzada Qousar Hussain, President, and Ms. Nyla Yaseen, Member, held Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice for underpaying the fire insurance claim of the complainant's shop. The Commission directed the Insurance Company to pay ₹4,76,190/- with 6% interest towards the claim and ₹50,000/- as compensation for mental agony and inconvenience.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Baramulla
Baramulla District Consumer Commission Holds Himalayan Motors Liable For Supplying Defective Vehicle
Case Title: Mohammed Altaf Puju v. Himalayan Motors & J&K Bank
Case Num: Consumer Complaint No. 39/2025
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Baramulla, comprising Peerzada Qousar Hussain, President, and Ms. Nyla Yaseen, Member, held Himalayan Motors (Seller) jointly and severally liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice for delivering a defective Supro Profit Truck Maxi VX WD vehicle.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam
Case Title: Joy Paulose vs. M/s Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Ltd.
Case No.: CC.No. 300 of 2024
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ernakulam, bench comprising Shri D.B. Binu, President, Shri V. Ramachandran, Member, and Smt. Sreevidhia T.N, Member, held M/s Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Ltd. liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice for unjustly repudiating the complainant's cashless and reimbursement claims arising from an accidental injury, and directed the opposite party to pay medical expenses, compensation for mental agony, and litigation costs.
Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: Abraham Paul vs. HP India Sales Pvt. Ltd. & Sysmantech
Case No.: CC.No. 1128 of 2024
The Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Shri D.B. Binu, President, Shri V. Ramachandran, Member, and Smt. Sreevidhia T.N., Member, held HP India Sales Pvt. Ltd. and Sysmantech jointly and severally liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice for supplying a defective HP OMEN 16.1” gaming laptop. The Commission directed them to refund ₹1,14,000 against return of the laptop, pay ₹20,000 as compensation, and ₹5,000 towards litigation costs, with 9% interest in case of default.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bangalore (Urban)
Case Number: Complaint No. 301/2024
Date of Decision: 26.09.2025
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bangalore (Urban) bench comprising H. Channegowda, President, K Anita Shivakumar, Member and Suma Anil Kumar, Member has held a Real estate developer- Merusri Developers Pvt. Ltd. and its officials liable for failing to furnish all documents to the buyer for legal verification of the property on which his villa was to be constructed by the developer.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jodhpur
Title: Jyoti Bhati v Amazon India & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Raj) 336
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jodhpur , has directed Amazon India, Apple India, and the seller to jointly refund ₹61,999 to a consumer for a defective iPhone, holding them liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.
Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: Deepanjali PB vs. Pradeep Kumar S
CC No.56 of 2024
The Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, comprising Shri D.B. Binu, President, Shri V. Ramachandran, Member, and Smt. Sreevidhia T.N., Member, held Pradeep Kumar S. (owner of M/s Prima Everlast Roof Makers) liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices for failing to complete the truss roofing properly, causing leakage and structural defects.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (East Delhi)
Amazon & Its Seller Penalized By Consumer Court Over Wrong Delivery, Refund Denial
Case Title: MR. HARJAS SINGH SODHI Vs. AMAZON RETAIL INDIA PVT. LTD And Ors.
Case No.: Consumer Complaint No. DC/78/CC/74/2024
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (East Delhi), comprising Sh. S.S. Malhotra, President and Sh. Ravi Kumar, Member, held Amazon Retail India Pvt. Ltd. and Appario Retail India Pvt. Ltd. jointly and severally liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices for delivering a wrong and obsolete product instead of the HP Pavilion Laptop ordered by the complainant.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T. Chandigarh
Case Title: Gurmeet Kaur vs. Healing Hospital and Institute of Paramedical Sciences & Ors.
Consumer Complaint No. DC/AB1/44/CC/433/2022
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, U.T. Chandigarh bench comprising of Amrinder Singh Sidhu, President and Brij Mohan Sharma, Member has held Healing Hospital and Institute of Paramedical Sciences and three doctors liable for medical negligence for referring patient in a critical and unstable condition. The Commission also awarded a compensation of Rs.50 Lakhs to the complainant.