Court Decree Not Needed To Change Spouse Name In Passport After Muslim Personal Law Divorce : Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that passport authorities cannot insist on a court-issued divorce decree for deleting a spouse's name from a passport when the marriage has already been dissolved through a legally recognised form of extra-judicial divorce under Muslim personal law.Justice Murali Purushothaman was delivering the judgment in a writ petition filed by a divorced Muslim woman...
The Kerala High Court has held that passport authorities cannot insist on a court-issued divorce decree for deleting a spouse's name from a passport when the marriage has already been dissolved through a legally recognised form of extra-judicial divorce under Muslim personal law.
Justice Murali Purushothaman was delivering the judgment in a writ petition filed by a divorced Muslim woman seeking reissue of her passport after dissolution of marriage through Mubaraat.
'Mubaraat Naama' is a written deed of divorce by mutual consent under Muslim Personal Law, where both spouses voluntarily decide to dissolve their marriage.
The petitioner's marriage had been dissolved through a Mubaraat Naama, a mutual divorce recognised under Islamic law. When she applied for the reissue of her passport, seeking deletion of her former husband's name as spouse and change in surname, the Regional Passport Officer refused to process the request without a divorce decree from a competent court.
The Passport Authority relied on an Office Memorandum issued by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in September, 2024, prescribing “Divorce order/decree” as mandatory documentary proof for deletion of a spouse's name from a passport. The petitioner challenged the requirement as arbitrary and illegal.
The Court thus examined whether MEA, through an executive office memorandum, could mandate production of a formal divorce decree from a competent court for deletion of a spouse's name in a passport, even in cases where the marriage stood dissolved through a valid extra-judicial divorce recognised under Muslim personal law.
The Court relied on Asbi K.N. v. Hashim M.U. [2021 (6) KHC 159] and X and others v. Y and Others [2021 (2) KHC 709], and reiterated that Mubaraat becomes complete upon mutual agreement between spouses and does not require judicial confirmation for its validity.
The Court observed that the declaration by the Family Court is intended only to have a public record of the extra-judicial divorce.
“When it is settled law that Mubaraat is a recognised mode of divorce, the authorities under the Passports Act cannot refuse to accept a Mubaraat Naama as proof of dissolution of marriage and insist on production of a decree of divorce, though a public record such as a decree of divorce may be desirable.” the Court said.
The Court further noted that the documentary proof of divorce need not necessarily be a decree of divorce recognised in accordance with Muslim Personal Law.
The Court noted that the Passport Information Booklet under Schedule III expressly states that divorcees applying for deletion of spouse's name are not required to furnish proof of dissolution of marriage, including a court decree.
“It is pertinent to note that nowhere in the 'Instructions for Filling of Passport Application Form and Supplementary Form', or in the Tables appended thereto, is a divorcee applying for change of name or deletion of the spouse's name in an existing passport required to submit a decree of divorce issued by a competent court. Since a decree of divorce issued by a Qazi is not a form of dissolution of marriage recognised under Islamic law, the applicant is required to submit a court certified copy of the divorce decree under Table 3. However, the same is not required in the case of Mubaraat.” Court noted.
After examining the relevant tables and documentary requirements under Schedule III, the Court held that the statutory framework does not mandate production of a court-issued divorce decree for such passport corrections.
The Court thus held that divorcees applying for change of name or for deletion of spouse's name in existing passports are not required to produce the court's order for judicial separation/ decree of divorce.
“The statute dispenses with the requirement of producing documentary proof of marriage or dissolution of marriage, including a decree of divorce, for change of name or deletion of the spouse's name in the passport. It is well settled that executive instructions or office memorandums cannot override, amend, or supersede statutory rules. When the statute does not mandate the production of proof of dissolution of marriage for deletion of the spouse's name from the passport, such proof cannot be insisted upon through an office memorandum in the nature of Annexure R2(a).” the Court held.
The Court therefore held that the 2024 Office Memorandum issued by the MEA could not override the statutory rules framed under the Passports Act.
The High Court thus directed the Regional Passport Officer to process the petitioner's application for reissue of passport by deleting the former spouse's name without insisting on a court decree and to complete the process within one month.
However, the Court clarified that the ruling was confined to cases involving divorcees seeking change of name or deletion of spouse's name in existing passports and should not be treated as a general proposition applicable to all passport applicants.
Case Title: Ayshath Bunayath and Anr. v The Union of India and Ors.
Case No: WP(C) 7780/ 2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 296
Counsel for Petitioners: T. Madhu, C.R. Aradamani, Avanthika R, Arunima A. R, T.S. Davis, Karthika B. Vinod
Counsel for Respondents: O. M. Shalina (DSGI)