Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 188 to Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 197
Nominal Index
Shailendra Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 188
R v H 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 189
Maan Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 190
Meenal Budholia v Kalyan Singh Budholia 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 191
Shanti Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 192
Kamru v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 193
Smt Manju Chawla v Indore Municipal Corporation 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 194
Pragatisheel Radiographers Sangh MP v Union of India 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 195
State of Madhya Pradesh v Suresh Chandra Ojha 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 196
SS Thakur v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 197
The Madhya Pradesh High Court imposed Rs. 50,000 cost on a man who had filed a habeas corpus plea claiming that his sister was illegally detained, observing that it seemed that the entire story was developed by the siblings in order to stop the police from looking for the sister's husband who is wanted in a murder case.
Case Title: Shailendra Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-17776-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 188
The Madhya Pradesh High Court enhanced maintenace amount ordered by a family court to a woman, remarking that it was a sad picture of the rights of girls wherein the woman who was allegedly a victim of child marriage, was again being victimized by being provided "meagre amount of maintainance".
Case Title: R v H, CRR-2566-2023
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 189
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has declined to grant further protection against eviction of a group of residents occupying the government land in Bhopal's Shyamla Hills area, observing that the occupants failed to establish any legal, tenancy, ownership or forest rights over the disputed property.
Case Title: Maan Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh, WA-1442-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 190
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed a petition seeking transfer of a civil suit from a Narsinghpur court to Jabalpur court, observing that the application was not maintainable due to non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of issuing prior notice to the opposite parties under Section 22 CPC.
Case Title: Meenal Budholia v Kalyan Singh Budholia, MCC-2556-2025
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 191
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has allowed the petition, where land was acquired for the construction of the National Highway, but the compensation amount was not released, observing that depriving landowners of their property without timely compensation violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
Case Title: Shanti Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-15538-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 192
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed the Superintendent of Police, Alirajpur, to initiate an inquiry against the investigating officer who arrested an accused in an illicit liquor transportation case, allegedly based on a truck sale agreement that was never examined by the notary or the witnesses.
Case Title: Kamru v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-23492-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 193
While quashing the revocation of building permission and demolition order issued by Indore Municipal Corporation, Madhya Pradesh High Court observed that once the body had granted valid building permission upon which parties undertook construction, it cannot subsequently revoke the permission in the absence of any proof of fraud.
Case Title: Smt Manju Chawla v Indore Municipal Corporation, W.P. No. 3547/2020
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 194
The Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld the 'Installation and Operational Guidance on Ultraportable Handheld X-Ray Device (HHXray) for Tuberculosis Screening in the Community' guidelines, holding that a radiographers' association's apprehension over radiation hazards, informal experiments cannot substitute formal administrative findings.
Case Title: Pragatisheel Radiographers Sangh MP v Union of India, W.P. No. 17859/2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 195
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the power of review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is narrow in scope and cannot be exercised as a substitute for an appeal.
For context, the provision enables the court to review its own judgment only in limited circumstances, such as discovery of new and important evidence, a patent error apparent on the face of the record or other analogous grounds warranting reconsideration.
Case Title: State of Madhya Pradesh v Suresh Chandra Ojha, R.P. No.1015/2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 196
The Madhya Pradesh High Court denied bail to a Doctor, booked in a case involving the deaths of several children allegedly linked to adulterated cough syrup.
Case Title: Dr SS Thakur v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-17066-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 197