Mr Gonsalves rests his arguments.
Senior Counsel Salman Khurshid begins his arguments, requests the court to refer to the list of issues submitted before the court
Gonsalves criticises the NHRC report on Jamia violence
'It is such a diluted report, no wonder SC called it toothless tiger', he argues
Gonsalves cites the SC judgement in Manipur Fake Encounters case to argue that local police can't be trusted with investigation in these matters
Mr Gonsalves produces the NHRC report before the court
'This report is also quite poor due to the same reason as to why the investigation has been poor', he argues
'Slogans and songs were loud in decibels but were completely legal. They've not become illegal as of yet', Gonsalves argues
'Investigation is completely one sided, all the video footage in the custody of police should be produced without editing', Gonsalves argues
Gonsalves: police must be directed to hand over all the video footage with an affidavit filed by the Commissioner
Gonsalves: Magistrate under section 156(3) of CrPC can't provide us with Special Investigation Team to conduct an independent probe
'Trial courts can't give you compensation or constitute SIT', he argues
Gonsalves: Magistrate under section 156(3) of CrPC can't provide us with Special Investigation Team to conduct independent probe
'Trial courts can't give you compensation or constitute SIT', he argues
Gonsalves cites judgements to argue that a separate FIR can be lodged for rival versions of the same incident
'Despite the separate FIRs, these matters can be taken up together', he argues