Supreme Court To Examine Private Universities' Functioning Across Country, Seeks Details From Govts & UGC

Update: 2025-11-25 15:25 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
story

Expressing its intention to examine the functioning of private universities across the country, the Supreme Court recently sought details from the Union Government, the State/UT Governments to furnish comprehensive details on the creation, functioning and regulatory oversight of all private and deemed-to-be universities.The Bench of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice N.V. Anjaria passed...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

Expressing its intention to examine the functioning of private universities across the country, the Supreme Court recently sought details from the Union Government, the State/UT Governments to furnish comprehensive details on the creation, functioning and regulatory oversight of all private and deemed-to-be universities.

The Bench of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice N.V. Anjaria passed the order while hearing a peculiar case, which started with a student filing a writ petition seeking a direction for the Amity University to accept her official name change. The Court has now converted it to a public interest litigation seeking information on how private universities are being regulated. 

"This Court would like to have details from the Government(s) as to the background/circumstances and under which provisions of law all private/non-government/deemed-to-be Universities came into being and further, what benefits the Government has granted to them, including the stipulations and conditions under which such benefits, both in terms of allotment of land, preferential treatment of any kind and/or other ancillary benefits conferred upon them. The Government(s) shall also furnish details of the memorandum of articles and aims and objectives of the societies/organizations and persons who are actually running/managing/in-control of the said bodies/Universities, whether through an apex body/Managing Committee/Board of Governors, i.e., by whatever nomenclature the top decision-making body is known as also their composition and mode of selection to such bodies which run the institutions."

In addition to the abovementioned information,  it has asked the University Grants Commission to disclose its role vis-à-vis such institutions on oath. 

"It is made clear that the affidavit by the UGC shall cover what the statute/policy mandates as also the actual mechanism to monitor/oversee compliance by the institutions. The details shall cover the policy of admission of students, the process of recruitment of academic staff adopted by such Universities, and the regulatory checks that the Government(s) have put in place to ensure that the terms and conditions enjoined upon such institutions, either by way of statute or policy or otherwise, are duly adhered to and the relaxations granted by the concerned Government(s) to the institutions in such matters."

The affidavit should contain the following:

 (a) Whether such institutions, or at least those of them that claim to, are functioning on the stated/advertised 'no profit, no loss' basis? How and under what authority have the Government(s) enforced this and ensured no diversion of monies towards anything unconnected with the educational institution, including salaries/expenses towards founders/family members and assets acquired by them?

(b) Grievance redressal mechanisms in place, both for students as also faculty/staff?

(c) Whether such institutions are paying the minimum salaries to faculty and staff, as mandated by law

The information shall be collated by the Cabinet Secretary to the Government of India and all Chief Secretaries to the State Governments/UTs from the concerned ministries/departments. It has been warned that there should not be any suppression or misrepresentation of the information.

"The Cabinet Secretary to the Government of India and all Chief Secretaries to the State Governments/Union Territory Administrations shall obtain and collate the information described supra from all concerned Ministries/Departments functioning under their jurisdiction and file affidavits personally affirmed by them. The Chairman, UGC, will act likewise. There shall not be any delegation of such filings. Further, responsibility for every disclosure and its correctness shall rest with the deponent(s) concerned.

If there is any attempt to withhold/suppress/misrepresent/misstate facts in the affidavits called for, this Court will be compelled to adopt a strict view."

As per the brief facts, the petitioner changed her name from Khushi Jain to Ayesha Jain in 2021. In September 2023, she enrolled for a one-year certification programme in 2034 as Ayesha Jain from Amity University.

In 2024, when she applied to pursue an MBA at the same university and submitted all legal documents to the University to change her name in the university rolls. However, she alleged that she was subjected to harassment for changing to a "Muslim name" and the university officials refused to change her name, because of which she could not fulfil the minimum attendance criteria to appear for exams and lost her academic year.

As per the petition, she approached the Ministry of Education as well as the University Grand Commission. However, the officials of the university did not pay heed to any of the emails sent to them in this regard.

When the matter came before the Supreme Court, the Court sought the presence of Dr. Atul Chauhan, President, Ritnand Balved Education Foundation, as well, the Vice-Chancellor of the Amity University to fix the responsibility as the student lost her academic year due to this. In the meantime, it was informed by the petitioner that she has taken admission in some other university, and the fees paid at Amity University were refunded to her.

The Court ordered the University to pay her compensation, which the University did by paying her Rs. 1 lakh. However, Court noted that the compensation amounts to making "mockery" of the Court's sentiments.

On October 14, it expressed its dissatisfaction with the conduct displayed by the university: "After deliberating on the issue at length, the Court is not satisfied with either what has been brought on record or the conduct of the respondents. What is worse is that a mockery has been made of the Court's sentiments by producing a cheque of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh), which has been offered before this Court as compensation. However, we refrain from saying much on the issue, for the present."

On November 20, it extended the issue to a larger public interest.

Case Details: AYESHA JAIN v. AMITY UNIVERSITY, NOIDA & ORS.|WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.531/2025

Click Here To Read Order

Advocate on Record Mohd. Fuzail Khan




Tags:    

Similar News