LiveLaw Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: August 3 - August 9, 2026
Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 307 to 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 318Nominal Index Tanmay v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 307Phool Chand Kosta v Central MP Gramin Bank 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 308Ashok Kumar Saxena v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 309Prahalad Sahu v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 310Dr Aarti Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 311AKP v State of...
Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 307 to 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 318
Nominal Index
- Tanmay v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 307
- Phool Chand Kosta v Central MP Gramin Bank 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 308
- Ashok Kumar Saxena v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 309
- Prahalad Sahu v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 310
- Dr Aarti Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 311
- AKP v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 312
- Vivek v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 313
- Dinesh Kumar v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 314
- SN v SSA 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 315
- Mahant Bhagwandas Sadik Shishya v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 316
- RKJ v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 317
- Shashikant Jatav v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 318
While granting bail to an accused, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that mere criminal antecedents are insufficient to invoke the offence of organised crime under Section 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), unless the statutory ingredients of the provision are prima facie established.
Case Title: Tanmay v State of Madhya Pradesh, M.Cr.C.No.32864/2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 307
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a penalty of dismissal from service can be imposed on the delinquent employee even after retirement, provided that a departmental enquiry was initiated before the employee attained the age of superannuation.
Case Title: Phool Chand Kosta v Central MP Gramin Bank, WP-3601-2016
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 308
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a retired employee cannot claim monetary arrears beyond the preceding three years, and in the case of a retired employee, the doctrine of recurring cause of action cannot be invoked to claim past salary benefits indefinitely.
Case Title: Ashok Kumar Saxena v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-14178-2019
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 309
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a law officer does not commit professional misconduct by bringing relevant facts to the notice of the Court, even if those facts incidentally favour a party whom the Law Officer does not represent, provided the assistance is rendered in the bona fide discharge of official duties.
Case Title: Prahalad Sahu v State of Madhya Pradesh, WA-2454-2025
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 310
Guest Lecturers Can't Claim Parity With Regular Employees For Additional Casual Leave: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has upheld an order of the Commissioner of the Higher Education Department rejecting Guest Lecturers' representation seeking an additional 7 days' casual leave, which is extended to regular employees, observing that guest lecturers are engaged on a contingent basis and therefore are disentitled to benefits meant for regular employees.
Case Title: Dr Aarti Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh, WP-39861-2024
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 311
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has upheld the dismissal of a Civil Judge Class-I from service, holding that while bona fide judicial errors are protected and are liable to be corrected in appellate proceedings, such protection does not extend to reckless exercise of judicial power or conduct unbecoming of a judicial officer.
Case Title: AKP v State of Madhya Pradesh WP-6329-2015
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 312
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has refused to quash an FIR arising out of the death of a bystander who was allegedly hit by a bullet during an unauthorised target shooting practice, holding that a compromise with the deceased's legal heirs cannot be a ground to quash proceedings for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and allied offences, which are crimes against society.
Case Title: Vivek v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-8946-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 313
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the pendency of a civil dispute over ownership or tenancy of a property cannot prevent authorities from taking preventive action under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) to vacate a dangerous building and safeguard human life.
Case Title: Dinesh Kumar v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-14795-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 314
Muslim Husband Can't Seek Declaration Of Divorce Solely On Basis Of 'Fatwa': MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a fatwa cannot form the basis for a decree declaring divorce of a Muslim couple.
Justice Vivek Jain added that no seminary can grant divorce to a Muslim male. The bench thus rejected a Muslim man's suit seeking declaration of divorce solely on the basis of a fatwa issued by the Darul-Dafa Masajid Committee, Bhopal.
Case Title: SN v SSA, CR-503-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 315
'Mahant Cannot Seek Declaration of Temple Lands in His Personal Name': MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has upheld the Trial Court's order dismissing the appeal of the Mahant of Janrai Toriya Temple seeking a declaration of proprietary rights in his personal name, observing that the Mahant cannot seek declaration of temple lands in his personal name.
Case Title: Mahant Bhagwandas Sadik Shishya v State of MP, FIRST APPEAL No. 249 of 1998
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 316
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has set aside the rejection of a Higher Judicial Service aspirant's candidature and directed the competent authority to reconsider his case, observing that the criminal cases registered against him during his student days did not involve offences of moral turpitude.
Case Title: RKJ v State of MP, WP-9838-2019
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 317
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has refused to quash an FIR registered against a journalist accused of extortion and criminal intimidation, observing that the respondents had placed material on record pointing towards a "broader pattern of alleged systematic extortion by certain local media elements" and that the allegations in the FIR prima facie disclosed commission of a cognizable offence.
Case Title: Shashikant Jatav v State of Madhya Pradesh WP-3937-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 318