LiveLaw Madhya Pradesh High Court Weekly Roundup: September 21 - September 27, 2026
Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 378 to 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 387Nominal Index:Himmat Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 378Praveen Bhargava v Piyush Bhargava 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 379Rajendra Thakur v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 380M/s Geeta Infotech Sales and Service v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 381Bajaj Insurance v Varsha Sirwani 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 382Vaibhav Singh v State of...
Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 378 to 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 387
Nominal Index:
- Himmat Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 378
- Praveen Bhargava v Piyush Bhargava 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 379
- Rajendra Thakur v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 380
- M/s Geeta Infotech Sales and Service v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 381
- Bajaj Insurance v Varsha Sirwani 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 382
- Vaibhav Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 383
- SK Finance Ltd v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 384
- S v SKO 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 385
- Raju Sonker v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 386
- D v G 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 387
The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore has clarified that a Civil Court in appropriate cases involving allegations of serious forgery has the inherent power to direct a party, witness to forward their complaint to the police for registration of FIR invoking its inherent jurisdiction provided under Section 151 CPC.
Case Title: Himmat Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 378
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that civil suits may be consolidated only when the issues involved in the suits are similar, and the common evidence is sufficient to decide those issues.
Case Title: Praveen Bhargava v Piyush Bhargava, CR-1059-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 379
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has quashed a preventive detention order issued under the National Security Act, citing complete non-application of mind by authorities who processed and approved the detention order within a single day.
Case Title: Rajendra Thakur v State of MP, WP-2986-2026, Rajesh Thakur v State of MP, WP 2986 of 2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 380
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a court, while considering a closure report, cannot compel the investigating agency to file a chargesheet as per its own opinion merely because it disagrees with the agency's opinion on the outcome of the investigation.
Case Title: M/s Geeta Infotech Sales and Service v State of MP, CRR-1685-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 381
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has set aside orders dismissing an appeal filed by an insurance company before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC), holding that its application seeking extension of time to furnish the pre-deposit receipt ought to have been placed before the State Commission for consideration.
Case Title: Bajaj Insurance v Varsha Sirwani, MP-4227-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 382
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday, September 22, disposed of a public interest litigation seeking a probe into spurious liquor deaths in Sagar district.
Case Title: Vaibhav Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh, WRIT PETITION (WP) 37587/2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 383
Vehicle Seized In NDPS Case Can't Be Released To Financier Over Owner's Loan Default: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a vehicle seized in connection with an offence under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) cannot be released to a financier merely because the registered owner defaulted on repayment of the loan.
Case Title: SK Finance Ltd v State of Madhya Pradesh, Cr.R. No. 3437/2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 384
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has set aside the order directing a woman to undergo medical examination at the instance of her husband in divorce proceedings, holding that such power cannot be exercised to permit a roving or fishing inquiry, particularly at the stage of final arguments.
Case Title: S v SKO, WP-4819-2012
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 385
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that not communicating grounds of arrest in writing to an accused amounts to a violation of Article 22(1) of the Constitution, but such non-compliance, by itself, does not automatically entitle the accused to bail.
Case Title: Raju Sonker v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-32331-2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 386
Article 227 Plea To Quash Wife's Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Case Not Maintainable: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to quash proceedings for restoration of conjugal rights is not maintainable.
Case Title: D v G, MP-2816-2024
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 387