Top Stories

AG KK Venugopal Refuses Permission For Contempt Action Against Kapil Sibal

Apoorva Mandhani
25 July 2018 8:17 AM GMT
AG KK Venugopal Refuses Permission For Contempt Action Against Kapil Sibal
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Attorney General KK Venugopal has reportedly refused to give his consent for contempt action against Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal for his alleged “professional misconduct” while representing two MPs in their petitions challenging the dismissal of impeachment motion against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra by the Rajya Sabha Chairman.

According to a PTI report, the contempt plea, filed by Advocate Ashok Pande, also alleged that Mr. Sibal committed "wilful and deliberate contempt of court" by threatening to boycott court proceedings after his plea for adjourning the Ayodhya case hearing till July 2019 was declined.

Mr. Pande’s plea was however turned down by the AG, with the observation, “The issues mentioned in our request for consent for filing a criminal contempt against Kapil Sibal have been in public domain for a considerable period of time and had finally resulted in impeachment proceedings being rejected by the Chairman of Rajya Sabha…

…What is more, the filing of a motion for impeachment was pursuant to a constitutional provision that reached its logical conclusion in a manner known to law. I do not believe that these facts can be a subject matter of contempt.”

Mr. Venugopal further added, “I may also add that I do not think it would be in the interest of this institution that is the Supreme Court of India to file a criminal contempt on the facts stated by you. For all the above reason, I decline to give my consent to the filing of the contempt petition.”

He also denied Mr. Pande’s request for an oral hearing, assuring him that he had considered all aspects of the matter and the public interest involved before taking the decision.

The AG’s consent was mandatory in view of Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, which requires initiation of criminal contempt proceedings either at the instance of the Attorney-General or with his consent if some other litigant wants to initiate such proceedings.

Next Story