Palghar Mob Lynching: Bombay High Court Denies Bail To 4 Accused

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday refused to grant bail to four men booked in the infamous Palghar Sadhu Lynching case wherein two monks and their driver were killed by a mob which misunderstood them to be thieves. Single-judge Justice Dr Neela Gokhale denied bail to Rajesh Dhakal Rao, Sunil @ Satya Shantaram Dalvi, Sajanya Barkya Burkud and Vinod Ramu Rao.The judge while denying bail, considered the gravity of the offence and also the chances of tampering the evidence and winning over the...

'Insurance Company Cannot Claim Non-Receipt Of Premium When It Was Negligent In Handling Cheque': Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court held that an insurance company cannot avoid liability by pleading non-receipt of the insurance premium when the cheque towards the premium was received in time but was negligently handled by the insurer itself. The Court observed that where the insurer assumes risk after receiving the premium cheque and issues a renewed policy, it cannot subsequently repudiate the claim on the ground of dishonour of the cheque, especially when the dishonour was not due to insufficiency of...

Bombay High Court Declines To Temporarily Injunct Use Of 'Saat Samundar Paar' In Upcoming Dharma Film

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday declined to grant ad‑interim relief to Trimurti Films Pvt. Ltd. in a copyright infringement suit concerning the use of the song “Saat Samundar Paar” in the upcoming Hindi film 'Tu Meri Main Tera Main Tera Tu Meri'. The court has refused to injunct the use of the song in the upcoming Dharma Products movie slated for a Christmas Release.A single judge Bench of Justice Sharmila U Deshmukh passed the order while hearing an ad‑interim application by Trimurti Films,...

'Come Back To India For Challenging Vires Of Fugitive Economic Offenders Act': Bombay High Court To Vijay Mallya

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday asked former liquor baron Vijay Mallya to file an affidavit stating when he proposes to return to India, making it clear that his challenge to the constitutional validity of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 (FEO Act) will not be entertained unless he submits to the jurisdiction of the court.A Division Bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad was hearing two petitions filed by Mallya—one assailing the vires of the FEO Act, and...

“You Do Not Care About The Poor”: Bombay High Court Raps Civic Bodies Over Construction Workers' Safety Amid Air Pollution Crisis

While hearing a suo motu PIL concerning worsening air pollution in Mumbai, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday came down heavily on the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) and the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), questioning the lack of concrete measures to protect construction site workers who are exposed to hazardous air conditions.A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice...

BNS | Stopping Person From Feeding Stray Dogs At Society Gate, School Bus Stop Not 'Wrongful Restraint': Bombay High Court

A person feeding stray dogs in crucial spots of a housing society like the entry/exit points, places where school bus stops etc. which are not 'designated spots' if stopped from feeding by other society members, cannot then file a complaint under section 126 (wrongful restraint) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), held the Bombay High Court last week. A division bench of Justices...

Mumbai Air Pollution: Bullet Train, Metro Line 2B, New HC Site Among Polluters; Bombay High Court Calls For Issuance Of 'Stop-Work' Notices

After being informed that there were several major violations of the guidelines to prevent air pollution, by various construction sites in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai, the Bombay High Court on Monday, orally asked the civic authorities to issue 'stop work notices' to all such violators, which include the construction sites of Bullet Train project, Metro 2B Line, proposed new High Court Building...

Bombay High Court Rejects Mumbai Metro's Arbitration Request Application, Rules Settlement Agreement Supersedes Original Contract

The Bombay High Court recently rejected the Mumbai Metro One Private Limited's (MMOPL) request to have its dispute with Hindustan Construction Company (HCC) resolved by way of arbitration. The Court deciding that the arbitration clause in the original contract no longer applies to new issues emerging from the settlement, ruled that once a "full and final" settlement agreement is executed,...

Res Judicata Not Attracted Where Issue Was Not Framed In Earlier Proceedings: Bombay High Court Partially Modifies Arbitral Award

The Bombay High Court has held that res judicata does not apply where the issue in earlier proceedings was neither framed nor directly adjudicated and that the court exercising jurisdiction under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) can modify an award by reducing the rate of interest where bad part of an award is severable from the good...

Bombay High Court Quashes ₹173.72 Cr Arbitral Award Against Thermax, Holds Arbitrator's Findings To Be Based On Lack Of Evidence

The Bombay High Court has recently set aside an arbitral award that mandated engineering giant Thermax Limited to pay ₹173 crore in favor of Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (RCF). The award primarily directed payments towards the additional costs RCF incurred for power due to failure of gas turbine generators. Considering a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

Service Tax | Pairing & Testing Smart-Cards For Set-Top-Boxes Qualifies As Job Work: Bombay High Court Allows Credit

The Bombay High Court has upheld the Mumbai Tribunal's decision allowing Dish TV to retain CENVAT Credit on imported smart cards, which were used for testing and pairing with Set Top Boxes. A Division Bench comprising, Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar dismissed the appeal filed by the Service Tax Department against order by the Mumbai, Customs, Excise and...

Bombay High Court Denies Interim Relief To Chinese Restaurant House of Mandarin In 'HOM' Trademark Dispute

The Bombay High Court has refused interim relief to a Mumbai Chinese cuisine restaurant, House of Mandarin, in a trademark infringement and passing off suit over the use of the mark “HOM.” By an order dated December 19, 2025, Justice Sharmila U Deshmukh held that no prima facie case was made out. The court said House of Mandarin failed to show that the acronym “HOM” had...