Madras High Court
Assessing Officers Are Not Governed By Strict Rules Of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 In Case Of Assessment Proceedings: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court has held that assessing officers are not governed by the strict rules of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.The bench of Justice C. Saravanan has observed that the assessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, before an assessee officer are not judicial proceedings. It is a quasi-judicial proceeding before a quasi-judicial officer. The provisions of the Evidence Act, 1872, particularly the special provisions relating to evidence relating to Sections 65A, 65B, and 66,...
Availment Of Lower ITC Than Amount Reflected In Auto-Populated GSTR 2A Return Is Clear Non-Application Of Mind, Madras High Court Quashes Assessment Order
The Madras High Court has quashed the assessment order and held that the petitioner availed of a lower amount as ITC than the amount reflected in the auto-populated GSTR 2A return. The petitioner wrongly availed of ITC, which indicates non-application of mind. The bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy has observed that, as regards the interest liability for belated filing of returns, the evidence on record reflects that the petitioner remitted sums of Rs. 3,97,353 each towards CGST and SGST...
Wilful Failure To Furnish Return As Per Sec 139(1) Is Only Criterion For Initiation Of Prosecution U/s 276CC: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court recently highlighted that provision of Section 278E of the Income tax Act brings in a statutory presumption regarding the existence of a culpable mental state. Accordingly, the High Court refused to interfere in the criminal proceedings and relegated the petitioner/ taxpayer to the trial, while stating that the onus is upon the petitioner to prove the contrary and that can be done only at the time of the trial. A Single Judge Bench of Justice N. Anand Venkatesh...
Rash Driving | Criminal Jurisprudence Must Move Towards Reforming Teenagers Than Branding Them As Criminals: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court recently observed that while dealing with rash and negligent driving among youngsters, the aim of criminal jurisprudence must be towards reforming them and not branding the teenagers as criminals. Justice Anand Venkatesh observed that instead of dumping the teenagers as criminals, they must be made to understand the consequences of reckless driving. The court thus suggested a conveyor belt-like system where the teenager indulging in reckless driving would get into...
Madras High Court Directs YouTube To Deposit Revenue Made By Savukku Shankar Through Allegedly Defamatory Video Against Lyca Productions
The Madras High Court on Tuesday directed Youtube LLC to deposit the revenue made by Youtuber and public commentator A Shankar alias Savukku Shankar through a video allegedly making defamatory statements against Lyca Productions. Noting that YouTubers did not have a license to tarnish the reputation of others, Justice N Satish Kumar also restrained Shankar from making further allegations against the media house. Lyca Productions had moved the court seeking damages to the tune of Rs....
Tax Recovery Officer Cannot Declare Sale Made By Assessee In Favour Of 3rd Party As Void: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court has held that a tax recovery officer cannot declare a sale made by the assessee in favour of a third party void if he finds that the property of the assessee was transferred by the assessee to a third party with an intention to defraud the revenue. The bench of Justice C. Saravanan has observed that the Income Tax Department will have to file a suit in terms of Rule 11...
No One Can Alienate Or Create Encumbrance On Land Belonging To Deity; Laws Of Limitation & Adverse Possession Not Applicable: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court has recently observed that no person can alienate or create encumbrance for land belonging to an idol or deity without following the due process of law. The court thus highlighted that the law of limitation or adverse possession does not apply to a land belonging to a deity, idol or temple. Justice P Velmurugan made the observations in a plea filed by the Fit...
Madras High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 11 to March 17, 2024
A weekly round-up of important cases from the Madras High Court Citations: 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 101 To 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 114 NOMINAL INDEX M/s.Saravana Selvarathnam Retails Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 101 The State v Muneeswaran and Others, 2024 Livelaw (Mad) 102 R Manibhyarathi v Union of India and Others, 2024 LiveLaw...
Madras High Court Denies Bail To Arrested ED Officer Ankit Tiwari, Cites Apex Court's Stay On Investigation
The Madras High Court has dismissed the second bail petition filed by arrested Enforcement Directorate officer Ankit Tiwari. Ankit was arrested in December 2023 by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption. The DVAC had alleged that Ankit had demanded money from one Dr. Suresh Babu as a bribe to close the pending case against him. In February this year, a...
"Leaders Shouldn't Be Stopped From Meeting People Who Elected Them": Madras HC Directs Coimbatore Police To Allow PM Modi's Road Show, Imposes Restrictions
The Madras High Court has directed the Coimbatore police to grant permission for conducting a 4 km road show in Coimbatore in connection with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the city on March 18, 2024. The court has however imposed some restrictions on the conduct of the roadshow. The district police authorities had denied permission for the road show earlier today. Justice...
Law Does Not Give Absolute License To Youtubers And Social Media To Spoil Reputation Of Others: Madras High Court Awards Rs 50 Lakhs Damages
The Madras High Court has recently observed that the court cannot shut its eyes to false statements circulated on social media to target and blackmail innocent persons. The court observed that the law did not give any license to YouTubers and people on social media to spoil the reputation of others. The court thus directed a Youtuber to pay Rs. 50 Lakh as damages to Seva Bharathi...
Presidential Order Of Scheduled Tribes List Can't Be Tinkered With By Court: Madras HC Dismisses Plea To Include Gudugudupukarar Caste In ST List
The Madras High Court has dismissed a plea to include the Gudugudupukarar Caste in the Scheduled Tribe list under Article 342 of the Constitution. Observing that the presidential order of the Scheduled Tribes list cannot be tinkered with by the court, the bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice Bharatha Chakravarthy added that granting such relief will be beyond the purview...