Top Stories

Aircel-Maxis Scam: SC Directs Centre To Submit Status Report On Probe’s Progress By Jan. 23

Mehal Jain
4 Jan 2018 3:25 PM GMT
Aircel-Maxis Scam: SC Directs Centre To Submit Status Report On Probe’s Progress By Jan. 23
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Supreme Court bench of Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Mohan M Shantanagoudar on Thursday directed the Union of India to file by January 23 the status report on the progress of investigation by the agencies concerned in connection with the Aircel-Maxis matter.

 The Aircel-Maxis deal of 2006 relates to allegations levelled by C Sivasankaran, promoter of telecom company Aircel Tele Ventures Ltd that Dayanidhi Maran, the then Minister of Communications and Information Technology (MoC & IT), in abuse of his official position, deliberately delayed grant of Unified Access Service (UAS) licences in sevenservice areas and other approvals/ permissions on various issues pending before Department of Telecommunications (DoT) related to Aircel on frivolous grounds with an intent to force its exit from telecom business by constricting its business environment. By adopting coercive tactics, the sale of Aircel to Malaysia-based Maxis Communications was brought about. After the change of ownership, the applications for issuance of licences and other requests/ approvals pending since long before the DoT were smoothly acceded to and after transfer of telecom companies of Sivasankaran to Maxis, undue favour was given to these companies, for which alleged illegal gratification was paid through the companies of Kalanithi Maran, Dayanidhi Maran’s brother. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had registered cases for money laundering and corruption respectively. On February 2, 2017, a special CBI court had acquitted the Maran brothers in connection with the Aircel Maxis scam.

Further, then Finance Minister P Chidambaram granted the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) by Maxis in respect of the acquisition of Aircel over and above the permitted limit of Rs. 600 crores, encroaching on the authority of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs.

“At what stage is the investigation? What are the pending issues that we need to decide,” inquired the bench.

Explaining the Aircel-Maxis case, Special Public Prosecutor Anand Grover submitted, “A person was forced by the then telecom minister to sell his company to a foreign corporation. The Finance Minister was empowered to grant FIPB approval for FDI not exceeding Rs. 600 crores, beyond which Cabinet approval was required. The ED had found that in the execution of the transaction, money to the tune of Rs. 1,000 crores was received a company owned by Karthi Chidambaram. In February 2017, the special CBI court had discharged the accused. Since the accused have been discharged, can the CBI and ED not continue with the investigation? This remains to be decided.”

 The main petitioner and BJP leader Subramanian Swamy also submitted before the bench the issue of harassment of ED Officer Rajeshwar Singh after the ED’s attachment of the assets of Karthi Chidambaram in relation to the said foreign investment irregularities.

 The bench directed Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to submit status report on the progress of the probe in the Aircel-Maxis scam by January 23 when the matter is next scheduled for further hearing.

Next Story