Top Stories

Allahabad HC scraps CLAT age limit on Petition filed by 21 aspiring candidates [Read the Order]

Apoorva Mandhani
10 March 2015 1:53 AM GMT
Allahabad HC scraps CLAT age limit on Petition filed by 21 aspiring candidates [Read the Order]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Scrapping the upper age limit of 20 years for CLAT 2015, an Allahabad High Court Bench comprising of Justice Shashi Kant Gupta has observed, “I am constrained to say that the Respondent No. 3 has completely shut its eyes and has not considered that when the Bar Council of India itself has withdrawn the notification prescribing upper age limit as 20 years for admission in the stream of Integrated Bachelor of Law Degree Program by means of notification dated 28.9.2013, Respondent No. 3 had no authority in law to prescribe the upper age limit for appearing in CLAT-15 which is merely an examination conducting university.”

“The aforesaid discussion clearly indicates that the age limit indicated in the notice/advertisement for CLAT–2015, as well as the information Brochure is without any authority of Law, as there is no provision of Law which clothes Respondent No. 3 with the power to fix the upper age limit,” the Court concluded.

The respondents had not filed a counter affidavit. However, keeping in view the nature of the case and the urgency involved in the matter, it was heard and decided.

This year CLAT-2015 is being organized by Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow, inviting applications for CLAT- 2015 for admission to 16 National Law Schools in different parts of the country. The last date for submission of Online Application Form is 31.03.2015 (11:59 p.m.), and the exam is scheduled on 10.05.2015.

The Petition was filed by 21 students whose online applications for CLAT-2015 were not accepted by the computer database as they were shown to be overage.

Earlier the Bar Council of India had prescribed the maximum age limit of 20 years for admission in the stream of Integrated Bachelor of Law Degree Program by means of Clause 28, Schedule III Rule 11 of the Legal Education Rule, 2008. However, later on the BCI withdrew the said condition by issuing a notification in the gazette.

The Petitioners hence submitted that the respondents have not power to fix the upper age limit for being eligible for appearing in CLAT-2015.

The Court failed to find any provision either under the State Universities or under the National Law School of India Act, 1986 or any other law whereby examination conducting universities have been empowered to fix upper age limit in the Common Law Entrance Examination.

Quashing the upper age limit, the Court observed, “From the Information Brochure of CLAT it is apparent on the(18) face of record that the Colleges/Universities which are included in CLAT -2015 are in fact recognized by the BCI and follow the syllabus pattern fixed by the BCI. Hence, the rules framed by the BCI are mandatory in nature and must be followed by all the concerned Colleges and Universities recognized by it.”

It hence directed RMNLU to abstain from rejecting applications for CLAT 2015 solely on the basis of age stipulated in the notice. The University was also directed to upgrade its website accordingly within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

Last week, Rajasthan High Court issued an interim stay on the age limit prescribed for the Common Law Admission Test, on a Petition filed by two 1st year students of NLSIU, Bangalore. The Organizing Universities have been prescribed by the Court to collectively consider and take an informed decision, in advising the Organizing University in respect of the maximum age to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Further, the Director of RMNLU, Lucknow was directed to display the interim order on their website. Read the Petition and High Court order here.

Read the Order here.

Next Story